|
11 years 3 weeks
# | SB*Nation Article: "Ranking the 5 best secondaries in college football for 2015" Recent Comments
|
11 years 3 weeks
# | SB*Nation Article: "Ranking the 5 best secondaries in college football for 2015" If anyone has not gone to see the linked photo in Roger's spot by Bitter, go view it. It's a treat.
In summer, we make the lagers we'll be consuming in the fall.
Sounds like a business opportunity.
Not sure how you view it, but as I played sports every year was essentially a "new" team. Because some people leave and other new people join. team chemistry, overall skill level all increase or decreases every year. I think this is what he means.
Let's change his number to 88. I know that's traditionally a WR number, but phuck it. It needs to be done.
It's been used before but no worries. Feel free.... not that I personally would use that particular gif after my post.

I forgot how ridiculous the 2001 Miami team was.
Dammit...no bourbon in Africa
All the more reason for him to take a knee in the endzone.
I was looking over the stats I have pulled of kickoff returns (the ones I mentioned in another thread), and actually, it looks like Newsome was the worse offender about running out of the end zone but not getting 25, or even 20. I gotta check some more, since I only have 7 games.
EDIT: I checked some more, and pulled the stats from all 13 games. I made a blog post about it, so I would bog down the forum here with the numbers.
But short version, we had 16 returns from out of the end zone. Only 3 gained more than 25 yards. We gained 305 yards on those 16 returns, vs. the 400 we could have gotten from touchbacks. If I take out Newsome's 58 yard return against Miami, it's 247 vs. 375 yards.
I foresee these in my future




There's speculation that Clarke will slide into the nickel spot with Frye as the FS in 4-2-5 looks. It's essentially what he did last year, except with Frye coming in as FS instead of Riley as the field corner. I think that's where this comes from...
Otherwise I agree... plus Reavis was a 4* by both Rivals and 247 anyway.
And at least one more power tool
I'm guessing this has been used a million times on TKP, but not since I've been here. I'm going to act like it hasn't happened.

They're wrong and they should feel bad...
First off Clark is the FS, not Frye.
Second who cares what the recruiting rankings were, those are meaningless for anyone but t-Fr
you have to ride the volume...commercials are so damn loud...but it is so great to hear Hokie chatter on the way home. Wish that Podcast was in place
Yes.


This might be the Millers talking, but I think I'm on to something.
Oh god
I'm going to summarize the forthcoming article right now:
a stunted Wang affects your sack (total)
It might come in handy.
How do we get ranked #2 with two lockdown corners? That is absurd.
Watching David Wang against stunts"
Well at least the adult movie with this title took home the "Best Picture". Talk about sacks...
Even without much returning experience I feel better about this year's line than last. I think it's just the fact that these guys have had two years of solid coaching and have been able to build some cohesiveness.


They are giving Brandon the benefit of the doubt by calling him a lockdown corner so not sure there is much to complain about. We still have a lot of question marks in the secondary, but the talent is there and if we stay healthy they can push for that top spot as long as our pass rush is as good as we think it will be.