
The release of the media guide is a major road mark on the long trip from the end of spring ball to the start of August camp. "Kids, wave bye to..." Preseason practice begins on August 4. In less than 3 weeks, pads will be popping in Blacksburg again.
Tech's media guide usually has a bunch of candid quotes from the coaches, and this year's edition is no different. It doesn't seem as if any punches are pulled. I scrolled through and here's what grabbed my attention. Note: everything written after this point should be taken with a grain of salt. The depth chart has an unlabeled disclaimer next to it, stating its current as of June 13, and is subject to change. In essence, it's the prologue to August camp.
The starting offensive line is comprised of exactly who I thought it would be, except for Mark Shuman beginning practice as the top left tackle. Shuman was a blue chip prospect coming out of Fork Union Military Academy, but hasn't been able to earn significant playing time in 4 years at Tech. Two springs ago, he admitted his effort level wasn't up to par early in his career.
"You know, my first two years here, I wasn't a big effort guy," he said. "But they're pushing me, and getting me to play at my highest level. That's all I'm trying to do. I want to go out there, show them I want to play and hopefully, that will be the conclusion, come [fall] camp."
However, a torn lateral meniscus in Shuman's right knee hampered his quest to start last fall. Both backup left tackle Jonathan McLaughlin (6-5, 314) and Shuman (6-7, 312) have size, but perhaps with the extra height, Shuman has a reach advantage. Or maybe Shuman turned heads during offseason conditioning. Either way, that's a position battle to keep a close eye on.
It's interesting to note that even though Tech has 72 returning career starts across the front-five, but only 23 are represented by the first group (Gibson and Farris).
Bucky Hodges is only listed a 6-6, which would contradict erroneous made up reports that he can dunk a basketball from his knees.
If I'm reading into things, it seems like Deon Newsome is poised to earn some playing time this fall. He's listed as a player to watch, and was described as, "A tough, talented player with a good work ethic," who, "Picked up a better understanding of the offense during the spring and showed flashes of big-time ability," that, "Needs to continue polishing his game over the summer to become an everyday player."
I wonder if Charley Meyer will be able to factor into the equation this fall. At ACC Kickoff last year, Logan Thomas stated he would be a major contributor at wide receiver. A preseason hamstring injury put Meyer behind the eight-ball.
I'm not telling you anything new when I say tailback and quarterback are the two positions on the offense with the most unknowns. Both Shane Beamer and Scot Loeffler noted how they each plan to settle their respective pecking orders.
"We've got a top three coming out of spring at tailback," Shane Beamer said, "And we want those top guys working with the first-group offensive line [in August], so they'll get the majority of the work. Then the rest of the guys will work with the next group."
Trey Edmunds, J.C. Coleman, and Marshawn Williams are listed as the first three guys on the depth chart. It seems like Joel Caleb, Shai McKenzie, and Chris Mangus will have to make the most of their minority of snaps and dazzle the coaches to supplant someone from the top group.
"We've got a lot of work to do to get where we need to be at the quarterback position," Scot Loeffer said. He continued, "You can't rep five guys. I'd like to get down to two guys who I think have a shot and rep them to death and see where this thing goes. We want a guy who can first throw the football, but not just throw the ball. We want a guy who can throw, extend the play, have some athleticism to run some spread runs and go from there."
As of right now, Brenden Motley and Mark Leal are top two QBs on the depth chart. If he continues to improve on his play from this spring, Motley figures to be in the quarterback competition until the end. Texas Tech transfer Michael Brewer and uniquely skilled freshman Chris Durkin will join the competition in August.
How much time will Loeffler allot the bunch before making the cut to two is the question.
The defensive two-deep is as about you'd expect it. The notable exceptions that I noticed were Desmond Frye and Der'Woun Greene as the second string free and rover, respectively. Frye's had experience at free, but Greene's played corner and free, but not rover. I wonder if this Coach Gray getting his backups used to different positions, or if this is where they'll stick moving forward. Between Frye, Greene, Anthony Shegog, Holland Fisher, and C.J. Reavis the battle for those two safety spots next season should be intense.
Vinny Mihota looks to be the fifth defensive tackle. He's listed at 6-5, 249, but it's noted that he needs to get bigger. Will he get some on the field seasoning at his size this year, or take a redshirt to learn the nuances of d-tackle and bulk up. Woody Baron is apparently healed up after post-season ankle surgery last year, so Tech seems pretty set with four solid DTs.
As Coach Wiles put it, "What weve got to get is more production out of our second unit. You see a lot of drop-off from the first group to the second group in terms of playmaking." I feel good about the tackles, but after quarterback, d-end is the position most in need of players to step up. Dadi's the only player with legit game experience, but he's listed at just 224 pounds. To mitigate the grind of his position, he'd benefit from someone being able to give him a breather. Ekanem, Alford, and Dooley are all promising players that I'll focus on watching during the open scrimmages in August. In a perfect world, all four become good enough to see significant playing time this fall.
Replacing Jack Tyler at Mike is a tall order, but Bud Foster is extremely bullish on Chase Williams' potential. According to Foster, having Williams focused exclusively on Mike, instead of both Mike and backer, correlated positively with improved play.
"Having him at one spot and having him get all those reps ... he played really, really well. He did a good job of getting us lined up and being fundamentally sound. Im pleased with where he is," Foster said.
Ronny Vandyke will open camp as the No. 1 Whip. That's encouraging. Of all the Whips, I believe Vandyke gives Foster the most flexibility in coverage. Given all the turnover in the ACC at QB, I'm giddy that Bud will be able to load the box with base personnel and dare a team to throw.
Torrian Gray summarized the status of the secondary well. "We were never healthy last year, but obviously the young guys played a huge role for us. You have a different caliber of players, but I think our depth would be able to sustain a couple of injuries if that were to happen like it did last year." His unit is loaded and he knows it.
The kicking competition is wide open. According to Frank Beamer, "None of the kickers have separated themselves." I bet my fake Internet Dollars are on Michael Santamaria.
It's a great accomplishment for the athletic department to produce such a comprehensive document with a relatively low number of typos. In fact, I only spotted one.

Two Deep: Offense
| First Team | Second Team | |
|---|---|---|
| Split End | Joshua Stanford | Carlis Parker |
| Tight End | Ryan Malleck | Kalvin Cline |
| Left Tackle | Mark Shuman | Jonathan McLaughlin |
| Left Guard | Wyatt Teller | Alston Smith |
| Center | Caleb Farris | David Wang |
| Right Guard | Augie Conte | Braxton Pfaff |
| Right Tackle | Laurence Gibson | Parker Osterloh |
| Tailback | Trey Edmunds OR J.C. Coleman | Marshawn Williams |
| Fullback | Sam Rogers | Greg Gadell |
| Quarterback | Brenden Motley | Mark Leal |
| Flanker | Demitri Knowles | Willie Byrn |
Two Deep: Defense
| First Team | Second Team | |
|---|---|---|
| Defensive End | Dadi Nicolas | Dewayne Alford |
| Defensive Tackle | Corey Marshall | Woody Baron |
| Defensive Tackle | Luther Maddy | Nigel Williams |
| Defensive End | Ken Ekanem | Seth Dooley |
| Linebacker | Chase Williams | Andrew Motuapuaka |
| Linebacker | Deon Clarke | Dahman McKinnon |
| Outside Linebacker | Ronny Vandyke | Josh Trimble |
| Rover | Kyshoen Jarrett | Der'Woun Greene |
| Cornerback | Brandon Facyson | Chuck Clark |
| Free Safety | Detrick Bonner | Desmond Frye |
| Cornerback | Kendall Fuller | Donovan Riley |

Comments
Goliath was listed only at 5'10" on the Gath Philistine's pre-season guide.
Sneaky, sneaky...
WHAT! I thought he could do that from a prone position!
I don't know if it's something to read into but on the "Tech Quick Facts" section on page 5 it's states the Defensive System as 4-2-5. Wondering if that's to point as the nickel defense now being considered the base defense.
Also noticed that in media guide it lists RVD as being 215 but on the hokiesports roster he's 204. I know roster weights will be updated for returners later on but just thought it was weird there was that difference only for RVD.
Good find on the 4-2-5. I would guess your are right in that it means the nickel is our base D. So that brings up an interesting position battle to watch... Clark v Riley for starting Nickel?
The 4-2-5 is our base defense, the whip is a hybrid position and depending on how it is used teams refer to the scheme as either a 4-3 or usually a 4-2-5. We haven't really ran a 4-3 since the early 00's. The nickel will still likely be run more this year though if the whip position isn't as strong or a 3rd corner elevates his play.
I feel a little bad for Joel Caleb. He has been moved around and stuck on the depth chart for a while now. I am not sure what I think about JC being listed as a co starter at RB, every time he has been given the role he hasn't been able to carry it.
Yea, I wish he had just stayed at wr. He is too skinny for his height to be a next level rb (6'2"/ 205) and only had a month or two with Moorehead before switching out. While he probably wouldn't be a starter this year, he'd be in a similar position as Parker, and I know how excited I am to have him as a future staple at wr. Just imagine the yards after catch potential if we had both Parker and Caleb out wide... too bad
I feel like they need to give him a Percy Harvin kind of role in the offense. Line him up at RB and WR and just get the guy in space.
Funny, every time I read about his development, this is exactly what I think. He's a hybrid playmaker, figure out how to get him the ball rather than how to pigeon hole him into a traditional position. This should be right in Leofler's wheelhouse.
This is what I worried about with him coming out of HS. Great athlete and important recruiting get, but what is his position? A little big and upright for a running back. Doesn't seem to be a natural WR and route runner. Probably too small to grow into an H-back while staying effective. Not nearly quick enough in space for a hybrid/slot role. Relied mostly on being a little bit bigger and faster than his HS competitors, which doesn't translate to the next level unless you are still bigger and/or faster, which he is not.
Kinda hope Bud's got him when August rolls around as he doesn't seem to be closing ground on his depth chart mates on offense. Still a chance to learn a new position and make an impact. Physically he seems to fit the mold of a backer or whip. I want him to make an impact, and it doesn't feel like it's going to happen on offense. We'll see though, lots left to be written in that story.
I think he should be doing what Carlis Parker was doing in the UCLA game. Putting the ball in the hands of an athlete and let him run.
I'd like to hear what Loeffler has to say about Caleb.
I heard he played some QB in high school...
6'2 205 is a little small for a TE don't you think?
yeah, LB/Whip would have been interesting.
Ronny Vandyke playing full speed this year could really tip the scales.
Beamer making a bitcoin reference. - Hilarious
Kicker game being in flux could be less funny as this team could be in a ton of close games.
Wait, didn't McLaughlin start at LT all last year? And now he's a backup to Shuman? Where did that come from?
I don't think this media guide has any credibility after seeing Bucky's height.
It's called 'disinformatzia'.
Those crafty Ruskies and the sciences that they have mastered...
"The depth chart has an unlabeled disclaimer next to it...and is subject to change."
yup. huge understatement.
and Charlie obviously doesn't coach the kickers. PK is way ahead of backup DE in terms of unknowns. Santamaria or Wise if I had to guess.
I have to wonder how JC is keeping that top spot with Trey...
Watching the spring game I was much more impressed with Caleb. I assume JC stays at the top of the depth chart for two reasons; his leadership role helps in the cohesion of the team, and Shane giving the nod to the upper class man.
Just for funsies, I ran a quick ANOVA analysis on the performances of JC and Caleb during the spring game. Of course, since it's just a spring game, and there are all kinds of factors in play that can affect a running back's numbers, please feel free to take all this with a grain of salt (assuming Joel doesn't rip my head off for doing the stats bit incorrectly).
The key part in all of this is the relationship between "F" and "F crit." Essentially, if F is greater than F crit, there is a statistically significant difference between the two groups (one back's production was significantly better than the other's). However, since in this case F is smaller than F crit, all we can say is that there is no statistically significant difference between the spring game performances of JC Coleman and Joel Caleb.
Also, not to toot my own horn, but this was really easy to do just looking at the playcharting data from the Spring Game and throwing it into Excel, so if this is the kind of thing that gets you excited, I'm pretty sure Joel and the rest of the writing staff are gonna blow your mind this season.
My comprehension of numbers ends at "This number is bigger than the other." So I'm glad you did this math because otherwise I would have said "The yards number is bigger, and the carries is smaller. MORE EFFECTIVE." Thanks math guy.
Is there beer involved in this formula?

Alas, no, just an Excel add-in.... wouldn't say no to a carbomb right now though...
I don't think Joel will rip your head off since you highlighted his 6.14 ypc in the Spring Game.
One comment (kind of a hybrid comment/question):
If I remember correctly, analysis of variance assumes your data is normally distributed. I'm not sure that's the case here because a) the sample sizes are very small and b) I think the data you're analyzing is inherently skewed. I don't actually know this but if you looked at a histogram of running plays even with an entire season's worth of data, I imagine most would be between between -1 and 4 yards or so, with relatively few outliers for the real long runs. The maximum run is also capped by the length of the field. I think this actually increases the chance of a false positive, and since the test failed to reject the hypothesis, it may be a moot point. Just something to think about.
Also, like you alluded to, there are a lot of factors influencing the data (were they playing with 1s or 2s against 1s or 2s, down and distance, play call, etc.). Still, if y'all compile granular data for the entire season like you did with the Spring Game, there will be a ton of nerdy things to look at, and I'm looking forward to it.
Your first point was a concern of mine, and a big reason this is mostly a "for funsies" analysis than anything we should be taking too seriously. With a big sample size, it'll probably be pretty close to normal, so that won't be a concern. I've taken a couple stats classes, but am by no means an expert, so if Joel is out there and wants to chime in, I'd actually really like to know if a normal distribution is a necessity for ANOVA.
*Edit* Also, lolz at the first line. I thought about differentiating between the statistician and the football player, but decided against it.
And yes, we'll be compiling data (what was/will be published in the Tech Specs articles is probably about 60% of the spreadsheet - we just couldn't fit everything on the site and make it look good) so we'll have plenty to analyze throughout and after the season.
I am also an ME guy, so I am by no means a statistician either. My comment should be read with a quizzical inflection that lacks anything resembling confidence. I just enjoy math and stuff, especially any sort of data analysis. I'm super excited about all the new stats stuff y'all will be bringing us this season.