Even though it's rather meaningless, I enjoy panning through how the coaches voted at the end of season: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/ballots/matrix/2015/.
If you're wondering, Frank Beamer's top four:
- Clemson Tigers
- Oklahoma Sooners
- Alabama Crimson Tide
- Michigan State Spartans
Forums:
DISCLAIMER: Forum topics may not have been written or edited by The Key Play staff.
Comments
Thanks Joe always good to see what coaches voted where especially for fellow conference teams.
I wish they did this every week. My favorite is Cutcliffe ranking UNC 7th. The guy is too nice.
Coaches and their reps will never let that happen.
I still think Bama should be the 4 seed and MSU the #2, I mean MSU has wins over Oregon OOC and over were the only losses of two one loss Top 5 teams. Bama beat an overrated FL team and looks entirely one dimensional.
But to hear the pundits tell it, Bama really stepped up and beat a great UF team, held them to a low scoring game.
Oh, brother. Yes. The same UF team that got embarrassed by FSU the week before.
I remember UF's first big downfield reception, an amazing catch in double coverage, and you could taste the disappointment in the announcers mouths. They literally said nothing in the moments following the play. Had that been a Bama reception, the slobbering over Bama's tremendous athleticism might have never stopped. It's called the halo effect and it has taken over modern college football coverage. I left ESPN coverage as my only means to protest but CBS is slamming the kool-aid too. Fox Sports, here I come.
Well your theory will be tested, as Alabama will have to go through Michigan State to get to the national championship.
An interesting question, I wonder if Fuente will now get a ballot since he didnt at Memphis?