Hokies' Offensive Woes Unable to Overcome Georgia Tech Trap

The Yellow Jackets curtailed Virginia Tech's Coastal coronation.

[Mark Umansky]

Given the absence of elusive quarterback Justin Thomas (injury, 35 consecutive starts), top B-Back Dedrick Mills (suspension, leading rusher), and two starting offensive linemen, Georgia Tech figured to be a historical footnote on Justin Fuente's first ACC Coastal Division championship. Few if anyone counted on the Yellow Jackets to deliver an emphatic, physical repudiation of the Hokies' championship aspirations. Instead, a fantastic performance by Georgia Tech's young offensive line, QB Matthew Jordan in his first start, and a defense that had been shredded like documents at Stratton Oakmont dropped the Hokies 30-20.

Most worrisome was the Hokies' lack of execution. Virginia Tech's defense has not been nearly as gap sound over its last three games, and tackling has regressed. Errors in execution seems to become more glaring the longer Bud Foster's group is on the field. Offensively, the blocking fundamentals, odd playcalling, and Jerod Evans' inconsistency in the dropback passing game has killed far too many drives to protect a defense that is struggling right now.

With Notre Dame far more talented than its record, and Virginia desperate to break a 12-year losing streak, Virginia Tech has a tall mountain to climb to earn nine wins and a Coastal Division title.

Jerod Evans Exposed?

Despite racking up 437 yards of total offense, Jerod Evans and his running mates had a nightmare performance. Defenses are learning if they can get the Hokies into third-and-medium or -long situations, and then take away the fade and quick slants which often constitute Evans' first read, his effectiveness becomes very limited. Brad Cornelsen and Fuente have protected Evans by using screens and QB draws in many of those situations. As of late, Evans is converting fewer and fewer of those plays. When he is asked to drop back, his reads are slow. If a running lane isn't there, coverage sacks come into play. Against Georgia Tech, Evans squandered several opportunities for big completions with errant throws to receivers off post routes behind the underneath coverage responsible for taking away the quick slant.

The most maddening moment of the game was the interception on an attempt to C.J. Carroll. The goal of this play was for Carroll to break open right on the first down line on a critical third-and-three.

Carroll runs to the middle and feels LB Brant Mitchell's (No. 51) inside leverage. He attempts to sit down in the soft spot to the outside of Mitchell, which is consistent with a stick route.

A stick route is an option route where the quarterback and the slot receiver both read the leverage of the defender. If the defender is playing inside leverage, the route and throw will be to the outside. If the defender is playing outside leverage, the receiver will break back to the inside. It's quick hitting route and it's important for the receiver to get his head around and find the ball.

If that was a stick route, Evans' throw should have been aimed at Carroll's left shoulder. Instead, Evans throws the ball well to the inside of Carroll as if he expected him to run a crossing route. Even if that was the call, it was a horrible decision because Mitchell and safety Lawrence Austin (No. 20) had inside leverage. Meanwhile, Hodges and Ford both had one-on-one coverage on slants. (Ford took a little longer to clear out from the underneath coverage.)

The route structure on many of the plays isn't helping matters. On this play-action, Evans fakes an inverted veer. Austin (No. 20, nickel field-side) bites hard on the run fake. If you pause at the moment Evans pulls the football from the mesh point, there is a huge vast space deep and in the middle of the field.

Most modern spread offenses have receivers make sight-reads on vertical route concepts. That is, if the coverage stays deep, the receiver breaks the route off underneath the coverage. Cam Phillips has a ton of empty space in front of the deep safety that is giving him a substantial cushion. Unfortunately, he isn't breaking off his route or looking back for the football. Evans pulls the ball down and ends up with a nice run, yet this is another missed opportunity for a big chunk gain.

What's unknown is how much leeway Evans is given to check at the line, and how much Evans and his receivers sight-adjust on plays. The lack of checking sometimes means the Hokies find themselves with a terrible play call on critical down and distance situations. However, if Evans has the power to change a play, he is sometimes really missing the mark. If he doesn't, Fuente and Cornelson need to improve Evans' recognition of tendencies and formations.

This quick pitch drove me absolutely nuts. Before the snap, Georgia Tech has four defenders on the field hash or wider. The Hokies only have two blockers (Ford and Sam Rogers) and Travon McMillian carrying the ball to that side.

The Hokies don't block the defensive end and can't cut off the linebacker, so ultimately McMillian finds himself facing three unblocked defenders. There is no chance of this play succeeding. With Georgia Tech's defenders aligned wide, this is a perfect opportunity to check to a quick hitting inside play, or perhaps the counter that I've been waiting for Cornelson to pop open all season long. However, either Evans doesn't recognize the alignment, or he hasn't been empowered to check out of the play. A minimal gain would set up a relatively easy third-and-short. Instead, the loss produces a much more challenging third down.

Unfortunately, the book is out on Evans. Duke and Georgia Tech's defense took away those preferred first reads on slants and fades knowing his second read is likely to run. Notre Dame plays man coverage, however, they prefer to play soft man coverage. Will Evans take what the defense gives him and accurately work underneath that coverage? With Notre Dame's talent on offense, the Hokies' O will have to be much more efficient to win in South Bend.

Virginia Tech's Maddeningly Inconsistent Offensive Line Play

Virginia Tech's offensive line is a problem. The veteran group gave up five sacks (although most were coverage sacks), and didn't get a consistent against a Georgia Tech defensive front that had not mounted much resistance in recent games. The film reinforced my initial impressions β€” inattention to detail, coupled with the lack of athleticism at right guard and center while continuing to use Augie Conte and Eric Gallo as blockers in space, chokes off any consistency and rhythm of the offense.

Perhaps most frustrating is this group is capable of lining up and pounding it down the throats of most ACC defenses. When the Hokies ran basic downhill running plays they were effective.

Note how Augie Conte (a focus of my critiques all season) gets inside position and drives his man off the ball. Marshawn Williams has a nice hole and gets a 4-yard gain on his only carry of the night.

Unfortunately, the leg drive, explosiveness, and aggression seems to disappear when the offense runs delay and counter-action. Misdirection plays are a mainstay of the ground game, and all season the offensive line has produced a laundry list of miscues on such plays.

  1. Engaging a second-level defender with a passive posture which allows the defender an angle to bypass the block.
  2. Poor angles and head placement. For example, on a sweep to the right, an offensive lineman sealing back ("blocking down" on a defensive tackle) should have his head and hands on the right side of the defender to cut off his pursuit angle. Fundamentals on back-side scoop blocks have been even worse.
  3. The offensive line plays with its pad level too high. Far too often Tech's o-line tries to bench press and turn defenders rather than keeping their feet active to run through them.

On this play, the Hokies are in a five wide set with McMillian in the boundary slot. At the snap, McMillian blocks outside on the corner who was aligned against Ford, and Ford cuts inside. McMillian essentially sets a basketball pick for Ford.

Augie Conte and Eric Gallo both get clean releases from the line of scrimmage. One has to get to linebacker P.J. Davis (No. 40). Conte misses Davis because his path is too shallow to intercept Davis' pursuit angle. Gallo isn't athletic enough to bend back to the inside and pick him off. Behind them, Wyatt Teller has to cut off the back-side linebacker Brant Mitchell (No. 51). Mitchell is going to pursue to Teller's right, yet inexplicably Teller swims to his left to release. The shortest distance between two points is a straight line. Teller's release to the left directs him towards where Mitchell started the play, not where he will be running to as the play develops. This is an example of the little things Virginia Tech fails to do. Teller ends up chasing air, and Mitchell combines with Davis to tackle Ford a yard short of the sticks. This easily could have been a touchdown, and there is no excuse that it wasn't a first down.

Johnson Wins the Chess Match

The chess match between Bud Foster and Paul Johnson has been fascinating to watch over the years. This time, Johnson's decision to rely less on the true triple option with a new quarterback paid huge dividends. It appeared as if he minimized the risk of fumbles on multiple reads and mesh points by calling plays where the runner was predetermined. Quarterback Matthew Jordan found success on double dives (isolation style plays where the QB fakes the dive to the fullback, and then follows him into the hole), counters, and QB draws.

The first Yellow Jackets' touchdown came on a double dive concept. The double dive has been the bread and butter short yardage play for Georgia Tech since Johnson became the head coach.

The blocking up front is almost identical to the triple option. The offensive line blocks down on the play-side. The only difference is the play-side A-Back's responsibility. Instead of veer releasing to kick out the corner or lead up on the safety, A-Back Isiah Willis (No. 3) cuts off whip Anthony Shegog and kicks him out. This should be a key for Andrew Motuapuaka and Mook Reynolds (rover) that the quarterback is keeping the ball.

Woody Baron has the A-gap responsibility. Ken Ekanem crashes and has the B-gap and dive. Ekanem attacks the outside shoulder of right tackle Eason Fromayan (No. 79), and is in perfect position to tackle the dive. However, he seems overly engaged with Fromayan and doesn't even see B-Back Marcus Marshall (No. 34) go by. If he could stick Marshall in the hole, it would jam up Matthew Jordan (No. 11).

Shegog plays a force technique and tries to turn Jordan inside by keeping his outside shoulder free. This is critical. As unblocked defenders, Reynolds and Motuapuaka have to account for the quarterback and the pitch. Whoever has quarterback, they need to fit inside of Shegog's force technique. Both guys run to pitch. Chuck Clark can't avoid a block. Tremaine Edmunds gets cut off back-side.

Ultimately, this tells the tale of the defensive struggles. On a vast majority of the plays, Woody Baron, Vinny Mihota, and others made strong plays to put Georgia Tech behind the sticks. However, at critical moments, those front four guys executed their assignments, but didn't defeat blocks, and then the defenders at the second-level were out of position or couldn't make the tackle.

Down 7-23, a touchdown run off a trap put the game out of reach for the Hokies. The design is for Marshall to get the ball, even though it looks like a counter option. Center Kenny Cooper (No. 55) has to seal Woody Baron away from the right A-gap. Right guard Shamire Devine (No. 71) has to turn Tim Settle to the outside. Left guard Parker Braun (No. 75) will pull to kick out Vinny Mihota.

Cooper throws a tremendous block on Baron and turns him outside. Devine gets on Settle's inside shoulder. Fromayan at RT gets squeezed inside by Mihota and doesn't get to the second level. Mihota then takes on Braun's trap block.

Freeze the play at Jordan and Marshall's mesh point, The B-gap is occupied by Settle. The C-gap is occupied by Mihota spilling. Tremaine Edmunds has Jordan on the spill, and Terrell Edmunds is coming over the top on the pitch man. The only unoccupied gap is the play-side A-gap (center-guard).

Motuapuaka followed Braun's pull, tracked Jordan, and ultimately got too far outside to cut back inside and make the play. As result, the A-gap was unoccupied. Motuapuaka wasn't able to recover despite being unblocked, and Chuck Clark got cut off by LT Jahaziel Lee (No. 53) (due in large to Ekanem not knocking Lee off his path to the safety when he squeezes inside). With the Edmunds brothers defending the edge, there is no help. It is an easy, ugly touchdown.

There were some consistencies among Georgia Tech's trap plays. They favored the trap when Tim Settle was in the game, and the defensive end to Settle's side was the likely target. Settle was responsible for the B-gap, while Baron took the back-side A-gap. The difference, as demonstrated on this play, was that Motuapuaka filled the play-side A-gap (even though he was very slow to get downhill).

This is what leads me to believe that Motuapuaka over-reacted to the counter-action on Marcus Marshall's 56-yard game-breaking touchdown run.

In the rare instance that Jordan did run a true triple option, and was forced to pitch, Reynolds (playing rover, a new position) found himself mesmerized by the backfield action. On this triple option, Mihota crashes on the dive effectively. Tremaine Edmunds is unblocked and takes the Jordan. This leaves Motuapuaka (who is tied up with blockers) and Reynolds on pitch.

Reynolds has to be wide here and stay with the pitch. Unfortunately, at the moment Jordan pulls the ball from Marshall on the dive, Reynolds plants his outside foot and it looks like he is going to push back to the inside. This gives Willis (play-side A-Back) an angle to cut him so he is sealed inside. If Reynolds runs straight to the pitch, Willis could only cut him where he is sealed on the outside. Reynolds has help inside. Outside, there is nothing but the sideline and space.

Notre Dame's offensive style is similar to Duke, with better athletes at every position. Foster will have to find more playmaking and better fundamental execution of assignments to slow down the Fighting Irish.

Comments

nobody knows the troubles I've seen.

Even when you get skunked; fishing never lets you down. 🎣

via GIPHY" target="_blank">

via GIPHY

β€œI hope that they’re not going to have big eyes and pee down their legs so to speak,” -- Bud Foster

EXCELLENT breakdown- as always. Paul Johnson's overall record against "good/athletic" defenses- Miami, VT, UGA, Clemson is well below .500. At the end of the day, athletes need to get off blocks and tackle someone when playing the option. Yeah, 30 dives a game can beat Wake Forest and UVA consistently, but VT's problem Saturday was not scheme related, and they didn't get "out-coached".. nope, a legit MLB and Rover - love Mook, but he is still green/inconsistent... would blow those plays up. Frustrating, and Bud/Fuente need to address the lack of athleticism and instincts at MLB immediately.. Get someone in here that can be a big time player at that spot

coaches recruit those MLB and rovers though. They also don't seem to give other players a chance to show they may be better than a struggling incumbent and instead just speak to how great they played.

The MLB situation will not be upgraded in next year. MOTU is the guy and evidently the best option. Athletic/instinctive not currently on roster. If he is then there is a bigger problem

There have been many times this year, especially in the Duke game, where both my dad (who played center in college football) and I have seen and commented that Edmunds is either pushing 54 into the hole where the play is going, or getting to the hole that 54 is supposed to be filling. I can recall one of the Duke Touchdowns where this was the case and was very exagerrated. anyone else seeing this? I think that Edmunds has passed 54 on decision making, that coupled with 54 lining up 7-8 yards off the LOS and his tendency to step backwards or laterally while tackling is an easy gain. It is frustrating to see, as I am certain he is giving it his best shot, I would like to see him more aggressive.

54

It's ok to call him Motu if you don't want to tackle spelling out Motuapuaka every time.

Warning: this post occasionally contains strong language (which may be unsuitable for children), unusual humor (which may be unsuitable for adults), and advanced mathematics (which may be unsuitable for liberal-arts majors)..

I don't know, seems like we need all the 'tackling' practice we can get

HTHokie93

In conversation Saturday, I repeatedly said about Edmunds that if he is in space or unblocked, he is a monster. If you get a body on him, he isn't beating the block. Motuapuaka had been really good up until the Duke game. His play has taken a huge step backwards now that teams are using a ton of counter action and read plays. Unfortunately, Notre Dame can run read options all day with Kiser, and UVA just made a QB change to Matt Johns, who is much more of a running threat than Benkert. These last two games are going to be really tough matchups for the defense.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

Can I down vote this French? Ugggghhhhh

Even when you get skunked; fishing never lets you down. 🎣

No, I don't think so. I mean, I'm not altogether sure and all, but, man, I think, well...no, probably not.

Reel men fish on Wednesdays

I was both looking forward to and dreading this. Thanks French, first read down now to go back in about and reread and rewatch.

Wet stuff on the red stuff.

Join us in the Key Players Club

Great read and watch. Send to the coaches.

foresthokie
US Navy Vet

Thanks for the great work French, as frustrating as it is to re-watch these plays after losses, they are informative as always. This was one of the more frustrating games to watch in recent memory.

I have to confess, I watched our good plays and skipped the defensive breakdowns. Watching them fall apart on the field once was enough.

But thanks for your effort. It was an interesting read as always.

Good work, French.

Question: why do they call it a "trap" run?

No, I *don't* want to go to the SEC. Why do you ask?

We don't love dem Hoos.

Blocking scheme... usually a guard pulling to "trap" a linebacker or DE so he can't get outside to make the tackle.. or an inside trap where the OT doubles the NG and fullback kicks out to block the DE

The idea is to allow a defender to run up field "unblocked" and then blindside him. He got "trapped" up the field. The quick inside trap was a staple of the wing-t offense I was part of in high school. Oddly, if run correctly within the scheme, it is the best "big chunk play" running play in the offense off of buck sweep action. Get the linebackers leaning, and if you can just get a piece of that inside guy, the play is popping a long way with minimal blocking. GT makes it extra effective when those offensive tackles can get to the safeties.

Young defensive ends out there- when you have to squeeze on veer dives, KNOCK THE PISS out of the guy inside you. Often, the blocker on your inside shoulder is going to your backers and safeties. If you don't chuck him hard, you are setting up your defensive backs to get creamed... and they may be a little less eager to call out a crack block on you!

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

Thanks French!

Does anyone else feel that we have entered the Twilight Zone and been transported back to last November?

Even when you get skunked; fishing never lets you down. 🎣

We've been on a downward trend in recent weeks . Something needs to change on offense . I really don't know what to expect against ND plain and simple.

Gotta say, I saw several instances where Sam wasn't able to block during the game. I would really like to see some improvement from him, there.
Everyone loves the guy, and all. But he needs to be able to block consistently.

So, where does the offense go from here?

Hopefully tweak some of these things. Work on better chemistry on these wr-decision routes, Evans intermediate and short accuracy and decision making, etc. Personally, I would like us to revisit the way we are teaching blocking technique to the OL but your guess is as good as mine if there is any chance that happens.

I agree, I wonder if there is any route tree or decision in this offense? French seemed to be hinting around that it wasn't clear on the pa iv scramble play. A static route concept?

1) Simplify the running game a bit. The OL can just zone stuff and get movement. Get downhill and don't give those LBs room to run around blocks. And use the backs a little more than the QB. When the QB has a run call, make it a read play so if the DE stays wide, he can give it to the back for a nice gain and not get the QB beat up. Evans has run a ton of inverted veer read plays, but VERY few inside zone reads. I think there is something to be gained by establishing the tailback on the inside zone read and then keeping once in awhile. Daniel Jones killed us with it and he isn't the runner Evans is.

2) If I am the WR coach, have the WRs looking for the ball even when running clear out routes. Add in a sight adjustment or two. I really think the PA pass was 1) throw to Hodges on the go route, which wasn't there because the corner was playing outside leverage soft Cover 3, 2) check down to McMillan on the swing, and 3) run. Evans skipped 2 and went to 3. Phillips is a heady WR, and I think he is bright enough to make that adjustment and sit down underneath the deep safety if empowered to do so. I don't think they are, and that may come back to how much Fuente protects his QBs.

3) I wouldn't be shocked to see Chung and Osterloh get some work this week, and if Osterloh had been healthy it may have happened sooner.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

Thanks as always- great

Was the f'ed up hike a result of center / qb not being on the same page or just a spaz; "I thought we were punting thing?"

Even when you get skunked; fishing never lets you down. 🎣

I told him I’d crawl on my hands and knees to be the DL coach at Virginia Tech. Now, all of a sudden, I’m sitting in this chair and I told him I’d still crawl on my hands and knees to work here. I just want to be here.
JC Price

Center heard the wrong play call

That is what it looked like to me as well. He snapped consistent with a speed option.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

Will we possibly see Parker Osterloh start over Nijman this week after his abysmal play against Ga tech? he was easily the worst OL on the field for us... Just a question

You put those words together, those are my favorite words, Popeyes and bahama
- Mike Burnup

Doubtful

What makes you believe he was "easily the worst OL on the field for us"? Also, if you feel compelled to add the umbrella coverage of "Just a question", perhaps rephrase your original thought.

Nijman has been solid for the most part this season. From my eyes, and the analysis of others, Conte and Gallo have been far more problematic this season.

I don't think the tackles have been the issue, personally I think Conte and most definetely Gallo have had down seasons to this point. Gallo's bad snap at the end of the first half drove me nuts; at this point in the season I don't know what other options there are to address their shortcomings.

Everyone had their moments. Notre Dame runs a 3-4, so lots of guys coming from all over with three big, relatively static down linemen. It wouldn't be the best match up to move a guy better suited for guard or right tackle to the blindside for his first meaningful action of the year.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

French do you think the defense is gassed a bit.

They have struggled 3 weeks in a row. This game and Duke they were on the field a long time when our offense was struggling. Even Pitt where we were scoring they were getting gashed.

Is the fast paced offense hanging the D out to dry since they aren't scoring?

What's
Important
Now

We know Mihota, Hill, and Williams (who got a three and out on his only series and then we never saw him again- should be playing more if he is healthy) are banged up. I have strong suspicions that Chuck Clark is dealing with an injury that is effecting his play. And, tired legs cause execution errors. I think the lack of depth is showing itself.

Ekanem's level of play has really dropped off. It is noticeable at game speed and jumps out even more on film.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

Let's Go

HOKIES

LMAO! Why didn't I do that to my kids? Oh well I have 2 grand daughters now!

Even when you get skunked; fishing never lets you down. 🎣

I know there is always cause for concern when you watch a team beat itself like this one has the past couple of weeks (and I'm aware that we won at Duke, but we made a LOT of work for ourselves in that otherwise manageable game), but the trend is there, and it ain't pretty. This team needs to get its ass squared away in a hurry, or else we'll be having this same discussion next week.

Also, I'm glad you didn't hold back on Conte's performance, French. I have quit screaming at the TV about his inability to block because he can't hear me. I mean, the guy looks like a legit O-lineman, but he blocks like a timid WR. He has a knack for taking the wrong angle, pulling up short on plays before they have time to develop, and setting weak ass picks when he should be driving guys into the dirt.

Furthermore, and you also touched on this above and many times this season, but what's with our OL's pad level? Are they even trying to use leverage to block? On clip #5 above (underneath screen to Ford), both Gallo and Conte get ABSOLUTELY FREE RELEASES -- didn't have to scrape or avoid anyone. Then they both proceed to take that glorious opportunity to potentially fly downfield and blow up LBs/DBs and squander it by standing straight up and lumbering around missed blocks. They look like two refrigerators that just got dropped in the middle of the field.

So what I'm trying to say is that I'm starting to get worried that it's a little late in the season to be correcting these kinds of mistakes from upperclassmen.

"You know when the Hokies say 'We are Virginia Tech' they're going to mean it."- Lee Corso

I hate picking on guys, especially OL. It is a much harder position to play. The more you get to play in a phonebooth, the easier it is. When you have to go into space and stay engaged longer, it is hard. I didn't like beating on David Wang, who was playing with a chronically injured ankle. I don't like beating on Conte, who by all accounts puts in more work to be a good football player than most of us have put into being good at anything in our whole lives.

That said, ultimately football is a team sport built on individual performances. Nobody can be great without everyone doing their job. Conte, for every good run block, gets exposed in space. He takes very poor angles and he is a prime offender when it comes to head placement and body position, especially on running plays where he is responsible for blocking down (see the awful block on the two point conversion attempt at the end of the game-if Conte has his head on the left shoulder of the defender, Evans walks into the end zone. That is also the easier angle, yet Conte stepped to the inside and the defender slid off of him to make the tackle.)

Moreso, and this is a HUGE PET PEEVE... when he misses a block or loses the block, he turns around and looks at the pile. 1) It will get you killed (see Tennessee) and 2) if the runner slips loose, you help him a ton more by getting on another defender. Worst case scenario is that you wear him out for later in the game.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

beating on David Wang


I swear, I'm adult, really.

Warning: this post occasionally contains strong language (which may be unsuitable for children), unusual humor (which may be unsuitable for adults), and advanced mathematics (which may be unsuitable for liberal-arts majors)..

Clip 1 looks like Vice has had them playing Marco Polo at practice.

have to wonder if conte is able to contain the swim move would Evans be able to see Ford streaking open late for possibly a TD as 2 guys commit to McMillian out of the backfield.

"WHAT DO YOU MEAN 'FISH OUT OF WATER' DOESN'T WORK IN P5 FOOTBALL?"

Warning: this post occasionally contains strong language (which may be unsuitable for children), unusual humor (which may be unsuitable for adults), and advanced mathematics (which may be unsuitable for liberal-arts majors)..

Take a look at film sounds like Bucky.

Moreso, and this is a HUGE PET PEEVE... when he misses a block or loses the block, he turns around and looks at the pile. 1) It will get you killed (see Tennessee) and 2) if the runner slips loose, you help him a ton more by getting on another defender. Worst case scenario is that you wear him out for later in the game.

Even when you get skunked; fishing never lets you down. 🎣

French, what does it mean to "block down"? Also, does the RPO pose a challenge for linemen by giving them extra read responsibilities so they don't end up as ineligible receivers (which has happened twice in two games) if the RPO decision is a pass?

It is short hand for a rule block where the first step is into the inside gap on a running play that goes to the outside.

I don't know what terminology Vice uses. My rules were:

GAP- step with your inside foot at an angle that will allow you to cut off any penetration to the gap on your inside.
DOWN- second step- if an interior lineman presents in your gap and isn't penetrating, put your head on the OUTSIDE shoulder of the defender and keep your body between him and the intended path of the ball. Ideally you drive him inside. (Note, in high school, coaches tend to teach the OL to get their head on the inside to cut off penetration and then flip their hips outside to cut off the defender. The problem with that technique is that if another blocker makes contact, it could get called as a chop block.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jk8oBVO1cy8

LINEBACKER-if there is not a defender in the gap, proceed on a direct path to the back-side linebacker. "Follow your 'boards' (like the boards used in bag drills) to cut off backside pursuit.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

Down Blocking means blocking the closest defender aligned the backside of the play. As opposed to "up blocking" or just normal zone blocking, which is typically just blocking the closest man toward the play side, and pushing them toward the play side.

Let's use an example of a QB Keeper with the RB lead blocking, aimed off the Right Tackle, between the RT and the TE.
The OL all block the man to their left, cutting them off from that intended path of the ball carrier. This should create a nice wall for the RB and limit penetration because the OL are already between the guy they are blocking and the ball carrier's path. Then at the point of attack there's typically a seal block or regular "up" block, pushing the edge defender in the same direction as the play, opening a lane for the runner. Any OL who don't have a guy directly to the backside would release to the LB's and attempt to block the linebackers.

Here's how guys would block when the line "down blocks"
LT releases to the backside LB, LG blocks backside DE, C blocks backside DT, RG releases to the MLB, RT blocks play-side DT, TE seals play-side DE and pushes him outside. RB leads into the gap between RT and TE and blocks the play-side LB. QB follows the RB and cuts off his block.

The backside guard or maybe a backside H-Back if we're not running a TE can also pull and run along the line behind his down blocking linemates to the playside (right in our example) and pick up that end defender, hitting them with a wham block to create that running lane. When it's a lineman pulling this is sometimes called a pin & pull. Pin with the downblock, pull a backside lineman to be the lead blocker.

Great breakdown. I truly feel as if the defense's problems isn't as much to blame on personnel and injuries as much as it is discipline, and this writing did a good job of explaining why. Bud can tell the guys where they need to be to succeed, but it's up to them to execute it. Reminds me a lot of the 2003 defense (although they had more talent) and how their discipline let them down at times.

Marshall University graduate.
Virginia Tech fanatic.
Formerly known as JWillHokieAlum.

How much, if at all, do you think our OL struggles are due to recovering from Searles' beefing up of the linemen? It seems like we aren't going to be doing a lot of power running, and that's what Searles was conditioning for. This line from your review struck me:

Conte misses Davis because his path is too shallow to intercept Davis' pursuit angle. Gallo isn't athletic enough to bend back to the inside and pick him off.

There's basically two options to fix OL play: either play perfect technique, or be athletic enough to recover from mistakes and misreads. I don't think the former is possible. But what would have happened if Gallo was athletic enough to bend back inside?

"I liked you guys a lot better when everybody told you you were terrible." -Justin Fuente

If Conte or Gallo bump him, it is a lock first down. Those aren't easy blocks. I was even more frustrated with Teller. Even if you show pass/draw, it isn't hard to swim inside instead of outside. That made no damn football sense at all. Essentially, Teller volunteered to run in Lane 6 while the defender is running in Lane 1 in the 400, and Teller said "tell you what, I will start on the same starting line as you!"

Our coaches always told us, the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. Go where your guy will be, not where he lines up. Teller went where he lined up and ultimately didn't even get close to the linebacker.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

I blame all our woes on the super moon. That f'er messed a lot of stuff up last week.

Back to our regularly scheduled program.

VT/ND 45-21

sol-a-rex

Warning: this post occasionally contains strong language (which may be unsuitable for children), unusual humor (which may be unsuitable for adults), and advanced mathematics (which may be unsuitable for liberal-arts majors)..

Really wanted it to be a butt

When you see it...

Nothing but clouds in RVA! I won't be around for the next one!

Even when you get skunked; fishing never lets you down. 🎣

What is wrong with me? I'm enjoying reading the websites that give us no chance Sat at the golden dome. Maybe we just need to be a big underdog now to get pumped again! Go Hokies!

SCHokie

French, do you think the Hokies can be successful with Cornelson, Vice, and Burden? Maybe I am including too many coaches there but it seems like the play calling to run when obviously the passing game is working better along with the O-line and RB's not looking like they can get anything going in the run game it just seems like 3 and out has come to be expected at this point. This looks like a way worse team than what we had beginning-mid season. Am I over reacting, blaming too many coaches, not seeing something or missing something? It seems like someone or some coaches are not on the same page and it is hurting the offense. This has been my feeling since Pitt, Duke, and now Georgia Tech. I feel like we will be in a dog fight the last 2 games and this could be much like the last 3 seasons after a hot start. So far overall I am happy with the first year we have had under these coaches but the O-line has so many veterans on it as does the RB position that it is discouraging.

FIRST DOWN, HOKIES!

Long way to go. Vice is the one who I have the deepest concerns about without knowing the chemistry between the staff and the players.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

God bless you for having to watch that piss poor performance again!

"Take care of the little things and the big things will come."

Thanks for reminding me why I got so pissed at the refs during that game. In the GIT clips, there were at least 2, possibly 3 chop blocks that were not called. Clip 1, Walker gets it. Clip 3, Settle gets it. Clip 4, Walker gets it. I hate GIT for the cut blocks already, but the chop blocks just show the incompetence of the officials.

Both of the ones against walker looks like they miss and don't make contact, but if they had agreed they would have been chop blocks. The one against settle I would not consider a chop. Seemed like a legit double team effort where the OL fell and still tried to maintain his block. He didn't dive below the waist.

The one against Settle was iffy. He fell, then tried to re-engage low while Big Tim was still being blocked high. The other two against Walker, he was getting hit low while being blocked high. I've seen us and others get called for a guy falling into a player while he's being blocked before.

Watch QB keeper TD, titled "clip7" closely. Walker #98 definitely gets chop blocked. The Center #55 engages him up high while the LG dives at his legs, hitting the outside of Walker's right knee with his left shoulder, and the inside of Walker's left knee with his helmet.

Of course under PJ's interpretation of the rules #55 is trying to release and go block #49 Edmunds so it's OK.

However it's obvious that #55 is chucking Walker to help keep him out of the running lane, and o guess what, Walker gets to the running lane a split second too late to tackle the QB.

I've suffered through a second watch of the GT game this week. I have to say, I was quite impressed with the offense....right up to the point where they made me a Narduzzi. Especially the 2nd and 3rd qtr, it was 10 yard gain, 7 yard gain, 9 yard gain, 10 yard gain......then some apocalyptic like an interception, fumble working for extra yards or sideways snap.

I know the weather will be bad at ND, but we played at UNC and the wind at Pitt was a huge problem too. I think we're going to be okay on offense.

My takeaways from GT:

  • Got stuck in third and long too often
  • Turnovers killed us
  • lack of depth on both sides of the ball is starting to hurt us

Defense did not play well enough to win us the game, but they played well enough to keep us in the game. Offense did not.