Skill Position Roulette

You can only have 5 non-QB skill position players on the field at a time. Here's what we have:

Edmunds
Coleman
McKenzie
Williams
Caleb
Rogers
Knowles
Stanford
Byrn
I. Ford
Parker
Phillips
Malleck
Cline
Hodges

What's your five?

DISCLAIMER: Forum topics may not have been written or edited by The Key Play staff.

Comments

All I see is QBs and TEs

I just sit on my couch and b*tch. - HokieChemE2016

You act like there's a difference

The thing is that the 5 guys can be replaced the very next play.

I'd go with Malleck, Hodges, Edmunds, Stanford, and Knowles

Edmunds, Bucky, Williams, I. Ford, Rogers.

Allen Ox

Williams - Juice is Beast
Edmunds - Two power backs... drool
I. Ford - I think he is really that good. Break out star IMO
Malleck - Was meant to be major playbook component last year, I expect the same
Cline - One of the best surprises offensively last year, expect it to continue

Edmunds, mcKenzie, I. Frd, malleck, Bucky

2 back, 2 TE sets will destroy for positive yardage if executed properly. We will never do it.

Rogers.

lolEdmunds- because in leal-ity there are two so I will be cheating

lolMcKenzie- 100% healthy he's my workhorse

lolRogers- why not? He can pass, block, catch, and pancake

lolPhillips- Big tall receiver who positions body well for that 5 yard fade

lolHodges- again can throw, block, catch, and also be a huge decoy because of his size/ability... but lets be honest he will be a big part of the game plan

"I'm high on Juice and ready to stick it in!" Whit Babcock

Edmunds
McKenzie/Williams (I'm going to need to see more of both, but one of them should do it)
Stanford
Ford (from what I hear)
Malleck

VT Class of '12 (MSE), MVBone, Go Hokies!

Edmunds, Ford, Malleck, Cline, Hodges. Because, tight ends.

Onward and upward

I'm going Malleck, Cline, Hodges, Rogers and Edmunds. Flex Hodges out occasionally, but I'm coming at you.

RB- Edmunds
FB- Rodgers
TE- Bucky
WR- Ford
WR- Byrn

Bleeding burnt orange and chicago maroon

Edmunds, Ford, Hodges, Stanford, Rogers. Power running, blocking, play action, and solid receivers, all in one neat little package.

Net Row Net Row Tweet Tweet Ho!

What about Newsome?

Sorry, I forgot Newsome, Meyer, and Prince

Never Forget #1 Overall Seed UVA 54, #64 UMBC 74

Edmunds
Malleck
Stanford
Ford
Byrn
Dink and Dunk down the field.

Rogers, Hodges, Kline, and Malleck in a Diamond Formation (Rogers as deep back)
Rotate the others as wide out.

A decade on TKP and it's been time well spent.

juice, Edmunds, Phillips, Cline, Ford

Shai, Isaiah Ford, Bucky, Stanford, Cline

#TouchdownTech

RB- Edmunds
TE- Malleck
HBack- Bucky
WR- I. Ford
WR- Stanford

Cline, Hodges, Malleck, Rogers, Edmunds.

I call it "The we're running it up the gut" formation. How it works is we have three tight ends, a lead blocker, and a proven power runner. When Edmunds gets tired, McKenzie goes in. When McKenzie gets tired, if Edmunds is still tired we switch to the "What the hell is that" formation. For this one, all four backfield positions are lined up together at about the distance of a shotgun formation. The four backs are as follows: Chris Durkin, Sam Rogers, McMillian, and Bucky Hodges. As the two wide outs, Parker and Knowles. This is primarily a speed formation. The goal is to get the fastest players on the field running like nuts.

Some notes: TEs in the "We're running it up the gut" formation will be used in play action pass situations. The "What the hell is that" formation is to be used rarely. One, maybe two plays a game, and try to do something different on those plays each time. Not too complex though to keep the playbook thin. Like maybe option plays.