I made a visit to Hokiesports.com to take a gander at our offensive and defensive statistics through the first 6 games. Found some interesting bits.
For all of the images for team stats, the number on the left is for VT, right is opponents.
First, the team offensive stats:
Because the offense is converting 3rd downs at such a high rate (top 20 in the nation), we're killing it in time of possession, especially seen on display today vs UNC, where we held the ball for over 40 MINUTES. WHAT.
This stat is skewed by how well we played against inferior competition (WMU, W&M). 4.1 ypc is decent, but if you take away those two games, it's more like 3.4 per carry. It will be even more interesting now that Shai and Trey are both out. Which brings me to
Joel Caleb with the 5.6 yards per carry thus far tells me that he can succeed in garbage time, and he's ready for the show. More than likely he'll be the #2 back for the Pitt game, and I hope he gets 10-12 carries since Marshawn may not be 100%.
This is good. Although only 14 of those 22 red zone scores are touchdowns, it eases the fears we all had post-W&M.
Now on to the passing game:
Although Isaiah Ford and Camp Philips have stolen the show in the vertical passing game, I was surprised Willie Byrn leads the team in receptions. It seems each player has settled into their role, whether it be short routes and screens, stretching the field, or just getting buckets (TDs) (Bucky).
We all know Brewer throws too many picks. This is truth. But he is also completing 62 percent of his passes to his own team. Hard to remember the last time we had a QB doing that through six games.
The other key point to this stat is on the defensive side. The Hokie defense is holding opposing QBs to under a 45 percent completion rate. That is outstanding. On that note
The O-line has taken some heat (probably deserved) for run blocking, but Brewer has been sacked less than 2 times per game (stat on the right side of the image). On the other side of the ball, the defense aka Ken Ekanem is sacking opponent QBs 4.3 times per game. FOUR SACKS PER GAME.
Miscellaneous stats:
If it's not illegal substitutions, it's false starts. 7 false starts today vs UNC (at least that's what it was through three quarters, there could have been more). Penalties have to be diminished in the future.
Pretty hideous. JC has the lowest return average at 17 yards per return, but Demitri and Deon Newsome aren't much better, as neither are above 20 ypr. Either stick Greg Stroman back there or fix whatever is broken.
Interesting points per quarter layout. These can be slightly skewed since ECU scored half of those first quarter points against us (womp), but the defensive 4th-quarter points allowed is a little disconcerting. However, it appears our offense is at its best in the 4th quarter as well, which works out nicely. The defense has been on lock for mostly quarters 1-3, but the offense tends to come out of the half sluggish, as they did today in the 3rd quarter.
Lastly, individual defensive stats.
1. Kendall Fuller is a monster. Even though he had his first FAINT today, his 13 passes defended LEAD THE NATION (CC: TheFifthFuller).
2. Dadi and Ekanem have combined for 9.5 sacks, so basically 1.5 per game JUST between the two of them. Also Dadi has NINETEEN QB hurries. Wut.
3. Chase Williams and Deon Clarke are killing it. Both have over 6 TFLs and 3 sacks, and Williams is by far the team leader with 49 tackles. That's over 8 tackles per game. Beast.
4. I was surprised to see Donovan Riley as the second-leading tackler on the defense, despite not even starting the first few games this season, and is actually tied with Chase Williams for the team lead in solo tackles.
Just a couple (or fourteen) observations of mine. Post your own below.













Comments
Anyone want to place an over/under on ineligible receiver penalties vs. Pitt?
Stat of the game I'm looking for: W
I know we're spoiled in this regard because we are DBU, but what Kendall is doing is unreal. Legit shutdown corner and he is almost always on an island. Nobody has been this reliable since Flowers.
Just imagine if the NFL had a 4 year rule and we still had Kyle on the roster as well...
Stop, my Fullerection can only get so hard...
Start Fullwood jokes here...
Kyle played 4 years at VT (2010-2013); he didn't leave early
Can't remember if Kyle redshirted or not but if he didn't, maybe he would have if Jayron Hosely hadn't left early? Like I said, I can't fully remember our roster situation.
He played Nickle in a few games in 2010 and a good deal on Special Teams
http://www.hokiesports.com/football/players/fuller_kyle.html
I doubt he would have redshirted even if there were 3 or 4 really good corners ahead of him. Stroman avoided one this year despite being the 5th corner and Reavis also avoided one, despite starting the season behind Bonner and Frye and sharing the 3rd string spot with Shegog. While I have a tendency to use the Jim Grobe "Everyone Redshirts" philosophy when playing NCAA on dynasty mode, our coaches tend to find a place for players with skill and talent to compete right away, especially the defensive backs. That's why only 3 of the 10 players in our secondary's 2 deep have taken a redshirt season (Bonner, Der'Greene, and Shegog).
So left of left would be the opponent?
lol. woops. fixed.
Thanks for your hard work. Your stats tell me there is nothing wrong with 3.4 yards per carry. Once the dust clears that's moving the chains for 10.2 yards for three plays and a first down. Ultimately, the only stat that matters is the win/loss column.
Except it's an average so, take away the long runs and it's much less than that and it's not 2 plays of no yards and one of 10.2 for a first down.
Go figure. That's why the W/L column is the only one that counts.
VTs season avg us 4.1. Other seasons:
13: 3.2
12: 3.7
11: 4.4
10: 4.9
09: 4.7
So 3.4 is not so good. Unless "ehhh...little better than last year" is good.
We're definitely more used to the 4.4 and up numbers
You got to remember 3.4 is average, not a median. Will make a huge difference in your argument.
This is a great look at where everyone stands.
Lots of positives in there. Good work.
One thing is clearly bothering me though...
Yesterday, if everyone of our kick returners took a knee instead of bringing it out of the endzone, we would have had significantly better field position.
How bad is our return game? We've had exactly 2 kickoff returns go for greater than 20 yds this year. 2!... in 6 games.
Until someone becomes a game breaker back there, take the knee when its in the endzone and get the free 25. It's absolutely killing our starting field position when our returners are met with a gang of tacklers at the 15.
100% agree.
This. I was screaming at the tv on every return yesterday -- take a knee!!!
As much as people didn't like Dyrell as a receiver, he was a consistent kick returner and we haven't had that since he's graduated.
Agreed, I fully expect Mook to be our starting returner next year.
C'mon...it's not like the KO returns are ranked 116th in the country (only because they're ranked 115th).
I don't understand Beamer's logic on this. He says it's worth the risk for a big play. But he plays for field position is EVERY other aspect of the game -- and the kick off is the one play where you reset the field position battle.
So he takes the 1 in 50 chance of breaking one over the 4 out of 5 chance that 5 to 7 yards of field position will get thrown away with each kick return.
He does not have a good kick returner right now and it's not likely to negatively impact our game so, he's getting guys to return kicks so hopefully one will get very good.
This way he will increase his chances of having a good one in next years NCCG.
Somebody needs to get some reps so we can be good when we need one. He's taking the long view. And so should we.
When we score 34 or 35 points we win.
Our losses we score 21 and 24.
Wonder how this compares to the previous two years. Normally I'd check, but you know...
Also looking at NCAA.com stats....Virginia Tech is third in TOP, which is nor typical of a Tech team. Also just doing a quick glance at the number of offense plays Tech appears to be pretty close to the top 10 (couldn't sort by plays ran). With our defense, if we can cut the turnovers out and improve in the red area then we have to formula for success.
We're #6 in plays run per cfbstats.com and around #20 in plays run per game by my count. We average about 79.
Being #2 in third-down conversion defense and #17 in 3rd-down conversions doesn't hurt.
I agree on the turnovers, but I'm not overly concerned about the red zone:
2014 with Closely Ranked Teams
RankName G Attempts Scores Score % TD TD % FG FG %
36 Georgia 5 27 24 88.89 19 70.37 5 18.52
36 Maryland 6 18 16 88.89 12 66.67 4 22.22
38 Air Force 5 26 23 88.46 17 65.38 6 23.08
39 Virginia Tech 6 25 22 88.00 14 56.00 8 32.00
40 Oregon 5 24 21 87.50 18 75.00 3 12.50
40 Oregon State 5 24 21 87.50 12 50.00 9 37.50
42 Colorado 6 23 20 86.96 17 73.91 3 13.04
42 TCU 4 23 20 86.96 15 65.22 5 21.74
42 Arizona 5 23 20 86.96 12 52.17 8 34.78
2013 with closely ranked teams
RankName G Attempts Scores Score % TD TD % FG FG %
109 Hawai'i 12 40 30 75.00 25 62.50 5 12.50
109 Eastern Michigan 12 32 24 75.00 20 62.50 4 12.50
111 Mississippi 13 46 34 73.91 24 52.17 10 21.74
112 Virginia Tech 13 42 31 73.81 23 54.76 8 19.05
113 Cincinnati 13 57 42 73.68 36 63.16 6 10.53
113 South Florida 12 19 14 73.68 7 36.84 7 36.84
115 Southern Mississippi 12 34 25 73.53 17 50.00 8 23.53
Source: http://www.cfbstats.com/2014/leader/national/team/offense/split01/catego...
While it would obviously be nice to have a higher TD percentage, there are some very good teams in or near the bottom half of the stats when ordered by red zone TD%, including 7 from the AP Top 25: #62 Notre Dame (63.64), #65 Ole Miss (63.16), #66 Florida State (62.5%), #85 Utah (56.25), #98 Arizona (52.17), #101 Oklahoma State (50.00), #107 Stanford (47.62). Virginia tech comes in at #88, scoring a TD on 56% of our trips to the red zone.
Not to be a downer put pretty sure Donovan Riley is the second-leading tackler because he keeps getting picked on and burned. I guess it's good that he's making the tackles to prevent it from getting worse but I swear almost everything thrown his way the last few weeks gets completed.
Or, on a positive note, it could just be that they don't even look at Kendall's side of the field so Riley racks up tackles. IDK.
I wouldn't say he's been getting burned. It happened in the ECU game, but then again Kendall got burned then as well. Other than that, let's be glad he's actually making those tackles when they throw at him.