Keeping Perspective: 1988 VT Football

As I've read comments from the past few weeks, I have been reminded of my first VT games. In the spirit of sharing, I'd like to offer up a a few tidbits from the September 20, 1988 Hokie Huddler. The game covered by that issue was VT's 35-13 loss to the University of Southern Mississippi in one of the all-time mud bowls. The Golden Eagles quarterback? Sophomore Brett Favre. Reading articles from the Collegiate Times that season, and the Hokie Huddler, have reminded me how special this program has become to all of us.

  • "Before Virginia Tech's showdown with Southern Mississippi head coach Frank Beamer told reporters, 'This is an important week for us. This game will tell us a lot about our football team.' " (p.3, Colston's Corner).
  • "Tech's loss last Saturday night tied a school record for most consecutive road losses (eight, first set during the 1973 and 1974 seasons). Since 1946, Tech is 33-38 in night games, including an 0-4 mark under Beamer." (p.3, Colston's Corner)
  • "There's no television game this week, but you can catch the game on the Virginia Tech Football Network." (p.7, Press Box View by Bill Roth). Keep in mind, the Hokie's next opponent was Syracuse - fresh off their run at a national championship.
  • VT fell victim to special teams play, with CFB saying "The quickest way to lose a game is in the kicking game, and thats certainly how we lost tonight." (p.8, Game Analysis). But things to come were foreshadowed: "Our punter [Kelly Fitzgerald at the time] is like our quarterback." (p.9, Tech Tidbits).

The goals for the Hokies at the time were expressly laid out by CFB and the staff. (p. 14, Insider). After reading this list for the first time in 27 years, my thoughts were "this truly defined what Hokie football would become." And as a member of Hokie Nation, I think this absolutely sums up what I expect when I walk into Lane, or click on the television.
Offensively:

  • Gain 350 yards of total offense, 200 rushing / 150 passing
  • Get a first down on their first drive 80 percent of the time
  • Make 19 first downs
  • Have two or less turnovers
  • Have at least 50% efficiency on 3rd down conversions
  • Score 25 points per game
  • Score 100% of the time inside the opponents 35-yard line

Defensively:

  • Force 4 turnovers
  • Not allow a run of 22 yards or more by the opponent
  • Not allow a pass completion of 25 yards or more
  • Give the offense field position inside the opponent 50 or [a defensive] score
  • Not allow touchdown inside the 10-yard line
  • Not give up more than 13 points, 3.3 yards per run, or 7 yards per pass
  • Average one sack per eight passing attempts

Oh, both lists end emphatically with WIN.

The Hokies were 1-2 after the loss. The victory was against none other than ECU, a 27-16 win at Lane. Yes, the series with the Pirates really has been going on THAT long. Virginia Tech would finish 1988 with a record of 3-8, with the only additional wins coming against Cincinnati and James Madison.

Edit As I tapped this out this morning I had no idea what today would bring. Thanks, Coach. For football, certainly. But even more importantly - thank you for being the physical embodiment of Virginia Tech, and a gentleman in every sense of the word, for this entire run. Thank you, sir.

Note: There are two absolutely great football photos in that issue of HH, if I can obtain appropriate permission I'll update the post with them. The cover shows Glenn Watts (OL) and Rich Fox (FB), sitting on an old-style wooden bench leaned against the wall, dejected, and quite literally covered head-to-toe in mud. The second, on page 9, shows Brett Favre getting clocked by VT DE Jimmy Whitten.

DISCLAIMER: Forum topics may not have been written or edited by The Key Play staff.

Comments

I like how the offense has an achievable list, but the defense has a list of what perfection would be.

The only one that is even hard on the offense is score 100% inside the 35.

The defense has some that are nearly impossible to do every time like give the offense the ball inside the 50, and not allow TDs inside the ten.

A field goal would be considered a score.

"I liked you guys a lot better when everybody told you you were terrible." -Justin Fuente

Well yeah but sometimes you get inside the 35, then get sacked. I'm not saying score inside the 35 is impossible, but it is at least difficult.

Okay, yeah, just wanted to make sure you weren't thinking Beamer was saying he expected his offense to score a TD every time they cracked the 35. While I think that's a reasonable expectation to shoulder the offense with, Beamer has never had an issue with leaving four points on the field.

"I liked you guys a lot better when everybody told you you were terrible." -Justin Fuente

I took the list from a longer piece. They also had special teams goals which I left out for brevity's sake. Overall, the intent of the piece appears to be an effort to share more of philosophy than what one might consider a realistic expectation. The only one that really seemed unrealistic to me was the one you refer to - give the offense the ball inside the opponent 50. I would point out that the ST goal of "block a punt, field goal, extra point or force a bad kick every game" was considered very unrealistic at the time this was written.

The list is attributed to Steve Marshall, VT's Offensive Coordinator from 1988-1992 (with CFB from Murray State) and current NY Jets Offensive Line coach. Perhaps to put the list more into context, it helps to include the lead / closing remark in as well:

"Some people may say that goals are only useful if they help you get to your desired destination. 'Bottom line!' yell the business experts... The Virginia Tech football team has goals it strives for each week, but in the end, according to assistant coach Steve Marshall, 'It's the win that matters.' "

The article concludes with "Goals are just that - goals", Marshall said. "They are effective teaching tools."

-- The Hokie Huddler, 9/28/1988, p. 14

And no surprise there, it's Wally Lancaster with an airball that looked gorgeous on its way to nowhere...
2/15/89, VT vs. South Carolina...

Lee

Have two or less turnovers

Seems a bit low for "goals".

Thanks for sharing.
I sat through all of those home games, and as I think back, had a freakin' awesome time.
We (I) really had no expectation of the great things to come, and minimal optimism.
But it was then and there that I developed my love for Blacksburg and Virginia Tech, and all of the great people that I spent time with there.
Funny, I don't look back and bemoan the losses and how crappy of a season it was, I think about the great pre- and post- game experiences and how much I loved being in Blacksburg.

I agree completely, back when the East stands comprised the student section and ONLY loved the early afternoon kicks. Why? So that the game bridged that period where you didn't know whether to sober up or keep drinking. It was amazing reading through a bunch of the old articles this weekend, realizing how Hokie Nation looked then and now.

And no surprise there, it's Wally Lancaster with an airball that looked gorgeous on its way to nowhere...
2/15/89, VT vs. South Carolina...

Lee

Have we really played ECU every year since 88?

Our motto bringing spirit true, that we may ever serve you

Longer than that.

Not every year no.

Wet stuff on the red stuff.

Join us in the Key Players Club

Every year since 2012 is the current streak. 2001-2006 was a nice no ECU streak. Data from HokieSports.

This makes me want to rip my eyes out...

"The Big Ten is always using excuses to cancel games with us. First Wisconsin. Then Wisconsin. After that, Wisconsin. The subsequent cancellation with Wisconsin comes to mind too. Now Penn State. What's next? Wisconsin?" -HorseOnATreadmill

Just makes me want to say "WHY?"

Thanks for the post LWats. Question: was there ever any dialogue from fans, announcers, newscasters, etc regarding the NCAA infracts and vios? I'm just curious.

I'll assume you're referring to the NCAA's October 1987 major violation findings at VT.

I know in the CT newsroom in 1988, it was discussed from the standpoint of 'how will this impact CFB and the future of football', but we were a year removed from the report and in CFB's 2nd year so I missed most of the initial reaction. I don't remember it coming up much in the post-games or media rooms I was in, but then again I was just a cub reporter and that was a lot of Crown Royal ago.

For anyone that's never read the report, here's a link to the NCAA Major Violations search. Just type in Virginia Polytechnic in the institution box and it'll fill itself in, then just hit 'Go Search' on the bottom left.
NCAA Major Violations Search

And no surprise there, it's Wally Lancaster with an airball that looked gorgeous on its way to nowhere...
2/15/89, VT vs. South Carolina...

Lee

It's sort of interesting that the most significant violations were in basketball, not football.

One problem was the dual hatted role where Dooley was football coach AND director of athletic operations, meaning his interpretation of the rules wasn't reviewed by anyone else.

I think Dooley's situation wasn't unique at the time, given the overall state of college football in the pre-Internet, pre-Big TV deal world. Today, a similar situation would definitely raise eyebrows and probably merit scrutiny.

Interesting data set, from NCAA Database:

By comparison, Total # of Major Violations / # Involving Football Programs since VT's 1987

Boston College, 0 (None in Institutional History)
Clemson, 2 / 1
Duke University, 0
Florida State, 2 / 2
Georgia Tech, 4 / 3
North Carolina State University, 1 / 0
Pittsburgh, 1 / 1
Syracuse University, 2 / 2
University of Louisville, 2 / 0
University of Miami, 3 / 2
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 1 / 1
University of Notre Dame, 1 / 1
University of Virginia, 1 / 1
Virginia Tech, 0
Wake Forest, 1 / 0

And no surprise there, it's Wally Lancaster with an airball that looked gorgeous on its way to nowhere...
2/15/89, VT vs. South Carolina...

Lee