Illinois Hokie's Recent Comments

I'm in a position where I could be there, but to get there I'd have to be such a corporate whore I couldn't live with myself. I take being a non-douche with a comfortable lifestyle over being a Benz-driving tool any day of the week.

No, I'm comparing population to population. The population of the Tri-Cities CSA is approximately equivalent to the city of Washington. Not the DC Metro area, just the city. My point is, the Tri-Cities CSA is population-equivalent to a major city, and more than large enough to fill BMS with a large percentage of locals come the Battle at Bristol.

Also, the populations of the towns closer to Bristol than Blacksburg are quite small.

The Tri-Cities area has a population of about 500K people. That's roughly the population of Washington DC. Finding locals to go to the game won't be a problem.

Brings up a great point. Some programs face more recruiting expenses by virtue of not being in a state that produces D1 talent. One of the big reasons Tennessee has always recruited nationally is because the state doesn't produce enough talent to build a program on. We're lucky Virginia produces a lot of good recruits. Not enough to be our sole territory, but a lot. That keeps costs down.

That's the question, though. How would additional resources help? If we're talking about turning the corner and getting the Da'shawn Hands and Josh Sweats to commit, then I don't think upping the budget will do anything. More money won't fix the problem that we can't land the top talent in-state. That's an issue of improving recruiting culture, not recruiting budget.

But if we're talking about expanding recruiting footprint, that requires travel, which means travel expenditures. If we are going to reassert in Florida and build in the Midwest and Jersey, then I don't think where we're at right now is going to cut it.

The article does a great job of illustrating that recruiting isn't something you can just throw money at. The biggest budgets don't correlate strongly with the highest levels of success. Look at the numbers. If we assume "middle of the pack" translates roughly to the median expenditure in the conference, we're into recruiting to the tune of slightly over $400K, which makes us competitive not only with the ACC but with all P5 conferences.If we're spending that money well, that's probably enough to get the job done.

Recruiting expenditures is NOT one area I want VT to be king of the mountain.

EDIT: I was on mobile when I first posted, and the mobile version doesn't have the detailed list.

$353K seems a bit low, but then I looked at Florida State vs Georgia Tech and UNC. Granted, GT is on a tear right now but I think Florida State is proof that you don't have to mortgage the farm to be successful in recruiting.

My point is, we should only increase recruiting budget if it becomes a hindrance to doing what we need to do, not just to thump our chests and say look how much we're spending.

Pages