Recent Comments

He talked about looking into how to divide the pay up among different positions in football, so I imagine they've talked about how to divide it across sports as well.

If Oregon, ASU, SMU, and Texas win then all P4 conference will be won by new comers. This means Big 12 > SEC, Pac 12 > Big12 and Big 10, and AAC >ACC

Was the payout he mentioned completely even on a per player basis, or does a football player receive more than a basketball player based on revenue generated, or visa versa based on bball team having less players, or some other calculation?

Sherrod Covil Jr. entering into the portal (Link Here). Recruited by Fuente's staff, didn't come to VT because he was worried Fuente was going to get fired.

Little bro is '26 at Oscar Smith and a dawg as well.

Western Kentucky vs Jacksonville State (JSt -4.5)

**Tulane vs 24 ARMY (Tul -4.5)

**19 UNLV vs 10 Boise State (Boise -3.5)

Ohio vs Miami of Ohio (M-O -2.5)

16 Iowa State vs 12 Arizona State (AzSt -2.5)

**5 Georgia at 2 Texas (TX -2.5)

Marshall vs Louisiana (Cajuns -4.5)

**3 Penn State vs 1 Oregon (Ducks -3.5)

**18 Clemson vs 8 SMU (SMU -2.5)

**-games I picked in CBS pick'em.

I could totally see Belichick take the job, then walk in and start having to kiss some 4 and 5 stars asses to get there and just be like "Nevermind..." and turn around and walk out the door.

That or he'd be like someone mentioned above..."You see my resume? You want to work with me? No? I don't care. Next!"

Not exactly a counter argument but something worth noting, imo.

We say this about offense all the time and I see no reason it can't be applied to defense as well. Talent is important BUT, a good scheme with well coached players can mitigate talent deficiencies.

If Bud's scheme is well coached and he has Clemson's talent then we have multiple titles. If Bud's scheme is poorly coached with Clemson's talent we probably only have acc titles. If Bud's scheme is well coached with VT talent we get acc titles. If Bud's scheme is poorly coached with VT talent we get what we currently have.

Talent alone won't bring us titles, just like scheme alone won't either. You need both. But a superiorly coached squad with inferior talent can win. VT has lost plenty of games to teams with inferior talent because we were out coached. It's more common to see well coached teams beat more talented teams than it is to see talented teams beat well coached teams with pure talent.

My point here is that talent does not always trump scheme. Scheme enhances talent. Good talent plus good scheme is ideal. If you can't get the talent you damn well better get the scheme right. If you can't scheme yourself out of a wet paper bag you had better bring in the talent. Bad coaches who can recruit have lost jobs because their scheme sucked. Look at Miami for 25 years. Talent ain't everything

Obi Wan meme . GIF

I get what he was saying. My point stands that if he wasn't going to be bringing a certain level of readership, and paying ones at that, I don't think he would have been brought onboard.

Maybe he wouldn't get as many if he was solo, who knows, but I'd be curious what people would have said if he'd surveyed his X followers.

And I love the content put out by TKP, but do we know that TKP paying membership would equate to what Any would get?

Pages