Recent Comments

Just so we've covered all the bases, they could also just go rogue and make all the games ACC. The rotation can be the teams you DON'T play in a given year.

I think it's better, though, to get at least SOME outside games.

I'm going to vote for the 8-2 format, with no permanent crossover, but some allowance for those who want to schedule their cross-conference rival every year (the allowance is that if it's not a scheduled ACC game, it wouldn't count towards or against the ACC conference total -- it would be considered an OOC game for all practical purposes).

Technically then it's not a flip since prep school reopens the recruitment process

No, pretty sure he's a linebacker. /s

Moss flipped in June 2012, McGlaughlin in December 2012 while he was at FUMA because he didn't qualify for ECU out of high school.

I vote 9+1.

And I may be in the minority, but I don't mind the cross-divisional rival setup we have in the conference. Several of those games are bigger than we give them credit for, and not ensuring that they get played every year would be a pretty big blow to most of the fanbases. (Probably the most meaningless cross-divisional "rivalry" game is Louisville-LOLUVA.)

Of course, division realignment could assure that these games continue to happen, but that's not what's at stake here.

ETA: As a secondary UGA fan, I'm imagining the backlash of the Auburn game suddenly not becoming annual.

You ever sign up over on the hoo message board just to see what they're saying ? Your email might be in there. Just a thought.

I think the problem with students feeling part of the team is the priority that alumni are given over students in ticket sales. "Back in the old days (omg here the old fogy goes again !) ALL students automatically got a pass to football games at registration". It's much harder financially for students to come to games these days and you have to admit, there's nothing that will make a fan faster than actually being at a live game. Congradulations to Coach Fuente for doing what he can to involve folks even when the financials of the situation are now "out of whack".

It sounds like you have an enemy out there that signed you up for UVA athletics newsletters and marketing just to annoy you. You may have just got the first of many emails to come.

That's a slap in both Fuente's and the current rosters face. First, he suggests Fuente performed a miracle, i.e. a supernatural gift from the heavens, instead of on Fuente having the ability to coach a lesser-talented team into a top-25 team. Second, a 1000-yd receiver, a 1000-yd rusher, an experienced O-line, and Bud Foster's D is pretty nice inheritance. Perhaps there's no Paxton Lynch on the team, but to suggest that the overall talent in VT would be less than Memphis is just silly.

The market, may be bearish - Miami, Pitt, UNC will probably be pretty good. Duke and GT are wild-cards. But, I would imagine a coach that can put Memphis in the top-25 should be able to keep VT afloat, if not re-establish VT as an ACC elite.

Pages