Recent Comments

Are public funds being used? Building these things with state funds is not allowed in Va but wondering about South Carolina.

Edit- donations and athletic bonds... wow. Dabo brings the energy for sure for these things.

Giving players cars, lodging, no-shows jobs, tutors and ghost writers for college classes. That is all well and good. But erecting a Boys Club on campus for football players shows how few fucks Clemson gives.

I was a little surprised. I would have thought that the Florida schools, or Texas schools or anyone in the SEC or maybe Oregon would have beat them to this point.

We're approaching the national tipping point for collegiate athletics arms race, and there's a good chance this will be remembered as crossing that line.

And believe me, when the backlash hits, it is going to get nasty

The universities are doing lots of math. Enrollment management is a very complicated system of maximizing profits for the universities. They operate primarily as for profit institutions with the way they make sure they are getting the most money they can possibly get from those enrolling. It's very calculated.

This seems to be getting out of hand.

If this is the direction college sports is going to go, maybe we need to separate them from our university system.

Also up for analysis is University of Maryland's proposed $150 million dollar athletics complex.

All of this is happening at the same time our elected officials are talking about how expensive a college education is. Do you think that maybe the money isn't being well-spent? Oh, I forgot. It brings in donations. Yet somehow tuition is going up faster than it ever has in the past. Someone isn't doing the math.

I'm not in the pay the players camp (at least not in the sense that some are, I support affordable stipends). But, throwing money away like this is hard to swallow. My argument has always been that the revenue sports are needed to fund the rest of the athletic department. But, having 55M basically used as a recruiting tool for football proves that at least some programs have excess money. The source of the money also becomes interesting.

Edit: after reading more thoroughly, I see that the recreational amenities are only a small portion of the whole facility. I have less problem with it now, but still feel like the recreational perks should at least be available to all the collegiate athletes.

For a public university to drop this kind of $$ for amenities exclusively for a very small portion of their student body is not a good look IMO.

I understand recruiting, but I would have a real problem if VT was doing this.

How the hell would Houston not be at least top 5 in Texas? Austin and San Antonio are clear number one and two, Ft. Worth is great as long as you differentiate it from the cesspool that is its uglier twin Dallas, which is vastly inferior to Houston. But that's only 4 other cities (if you count Dallas, but honestly, we shouldn't because fuck Dallas). What's left? El Paso? The sewage retention area known as Galveston? Fucking Beaumont??? I mean, damn, Houston is top 5 by default.

I guess you didn't read the fine print of the plan. The woman's vollyball and soccer teams are allowed to serve drinks at the fully operational hooters that they have attached to this complex.

College football players need to be example setters, not spoiled kids with preferential treatment! I hope we continue to run our program the way we do, upgrading facilities is one thing, making a big play ground for grown college men is another. Not everyone will go on to play professional football so I hope they work equally as hard in the class room toward getting a degree that will allow them to be a productive member of society. Nothing is wrong with having fun with friends but having a play ground exclusively for college football players sends the wrong message.

"We don't have the money to match this. Just clear out the classrooms and install the bumper boats and skee-ball lanes for the players instead. They weren't using that space anyway"

- UNC

Lived on campus all 4 years (Thomas then 3 years in East AJ, pre-renovations). For a socially inept engineer like myself, I shudder to think what 4 years of being able to hole away in an apartment would have been like.

Got six bites eeling on Sunday, landed a 33" and a 44", lost another big fish and just flat missed the others. Ran into a beehive of terns on acres of schoolies on the way back and caught them until we had to run on in. The 44 weighed about 35lbs on a hand held scale. Not as big as they often run on eels, but nice fish nonetheless. Cold nights seemed to activate/move them down into our part of the Bay, but the warm up may just stop that in a hurry. I promised myself that if we got one over 40 lbs I would learn to use imgr, but alas. Did send pics to French, but he was out getting his own big striper. Nice fish, Jonathan!!

Yeah it's moreso that they have other needs and are choosing to build unnecessary things instead. I personally would always choose to live off campus, I lived essentially across the street, in a great place, for my last three years.

To be fair, no one lives on campus after their freshman year at VT either. Granted, VT has made significant strides towards improving the housing conditions, particularly for honors students, in recent years.

Pages