Recent Comments

The order doesn't matter. My point still stands. If the TV market is flooded with more football games than people can't watch they will lose value. At some point the bowl sponsors will lose money because there aren't enough people watching the games on TV. Of the 40 bowl games that will be available I will only be able to watch 6, maybe 7 of them. I can't be the only CFB fan in that department.

Confirmed list on 247:

Jmmie Taylor
Keith Simms
Caleb Evans
Demetri Moore (JUCO)
Cedrick Wilson (JUCO)
Jerod Evans (JUCO)

Screw the ACC. No one can leave so now we'll have power hungry bureaucrats telling schools and athletes what they can and can't do. The ADs should stop their collective ball licking while back stroking, and leave this up to the individual schools.

If kids start to view bowls as a way to get a way and have a vacation, how will the ACC pitch this to a potential recruit? Oh, yeah, the ACC won't be there for that.

If a school could make a bunch of money and make their alumni base happy by playing in the Inaugural Machu Picchu Bowl, how will the ACC pitch this to their alumni base? Oh, yeah, the ACC won't be there for that.

Decision making rights should absolutely be left to the schools and stripped from the ACC, except where absolutely necessary. Anything Swofford wants to delegate to his son excepted.

I disagree, those helmets from the UVA game are throwbacks, and good ones at that. Chrome and whatever is nice, but everyone, even high schoolers dig throwbacks. Plus ours pop, whether you're at the game or watching on TV. The all maroon ones we've worn for years are dull and the don't grab anyone's attention. Adding that white facemask with the stripes I think is a unique enough look and could become very recognizable if paired with the right jerseys. Of course there should be some variety for certain games, maybe a fighting gobbler or TV logo thrown in every once in a while. I think the Hokie Stone should be worn once a year, who cares what everyone outside of us thinks, those helmets speak to Hokies everywhere.

I hate that average seasons get rewarded, but what's wrong with more football? Even crappy bowls pay each school a lot of money. I don't see a problem with letting some company pay two 6-6 teams to come play. It's not downplaying the teams who had good records. Want to go to a better bowl? Get a better record. Having a team go to a bowl is good for everyone involved. It doesn't hurt anything.

I think that's certainly more plausible than what I proposed but are we saying that Burden's recruiting connections are the only real catalyst to him being retained? Along these lines does Burden have any formal experience with RB's or is the thought process simply that he should know the position well enough given his current experience?

I've known Mitch, that sportscaster, since elementary school. He was our QB at Freeman when we were upperclassmen. Funny thing is he rooted for FSU in our K-12 years, but went to Da U.

Let me rephrase. The perfect Mike of the future. I'm perfectly fine with redshirt sophomore Simms sliding into the role after Motu graduates.

I agree that sending .500 or sub .500 teams to bowls is silly and there may be too many bowls, but bowls =
1) More money
2)More practice
3)More football

If anyone can make a valid argument against any of those, I wanna hear it.

Pages