Recent Comments

Real Name: Jason Brown
TKP Username: AZHokie22
Email: jasonbrowncrps@gmail.com
League preferences (mainly PPR or no): PPR
Draft blackout dates (vacations, days you'll be at concerts/games, etc.): Being on AZ time, I pretty much just go for whatever works for people. The ESPN draft functionality on smart phones is not bad

The information in the conduct referral will be reviewed by a professional staff member in Student Conduct. If there is the potential that a policy was violated during the incident, students will receive an email notice. At that meeting, you will be able to describe what happened during the incident in question. You can resolve your case immediately through an agreed resolution or schedule a formal hearing.

At the formal hearing, You can expect to "be heard." The meeting or hearing is not an opportunity to "defend yourself." Nor, are you "presumed guilty". The C.R. represents only a portion of what took place in the incident, you are being asked to attend to describe your involvement (if you choose). The hearing officer or committee will ask questions regarding the incident and discuss with you how the conduct affects you and the community. Once all information has been shared, the hearing officer or committee will make a decision regarding the policies and if appropriate, issue sanctions.

Appeals must be based only on the following grounds: (1) denial of procedural guarantees, (2) significant and relevant new evidence that was not available at the time of the hearing, and/or (3) sanctions/findings that are unduly harsh or arbitrary. Appeal requests will be denied in cases not having sufficient grounds in one or more of these areas.

At a formal hearing, the student or organizational representative may challenge the objectivity of any committee member or administrator, given reasonable cause to believe that the member may be biased or have a conflict of interest. (In the case of a committee formal hearing, the committee advisor will make a final ruling on any such challenge.)
The outcome of the formal hearing will be determined solely on the basis of evidence presented. A determination of responsibility is made when the preponderance of evidence supports the charge(s).

I was surprised to see Durkin's weight down to 221 as well. Apparently, the heights and weights have been updated from the spring on the site. That's down 21 pounds from this spring. Maybe an effort to increase agility/mobility? Still a big guy at 6'4" 221. I think Motley shrunk an inch or two as well. Interesting.

I've been pretty critical of the process, too. I think there needs to be better oversight and transparency, as well, especially given that VT is a public university. I just think that everyone (students especially) should be more aware of what expectations are (because, as has been said, most aren't) and should assume that the worst is possible.

forgive me, but this showed up as a reply to me, but it sounds more like you are talking to vtnerf...Anyway, You did beat a team as good as us (yup, I think I'm on the team) and I would never take that away. My point was you played so good against the Bucks, but then go 7-6 with a bad loss to Wake. that's all I meant.

GT is all teams are happy Kyle is no longer on VT's roster.

FTFY

And on the GT play, the C (I think that is Farris) is playing straight up and down and gets driven backwards by a lower defender.

Literally, you hit the DL "in the P-Hole."

I hope I get to the point where I can read things like this without giggling like a teenager. But seriously, this is why I joined TKP, thanks for the insight.

got you

No problem brother.

Had to talk to ole Seamus to find out who you were haha mistook his stud for yours he's 595.

I remember from media days that Beamer quipped about encouraging the Fuller parents to go on a vacation and see what happens