Recent Comments
We're pumpkin twins!

Only the top 250 were recognized, atleast that's how I remember it.
|
11 years 1 month
# | Article from Clevland.com "Can Virginia Tech beat Ohio State? A 10 percent chance the Buckeyes could lose" I agree, I'm not being ridiculous and saying he didn't get any better. And I think any rational OSU fan will concede how good the VT defense was that game. I'm just tired of seeing "breakdowns" of this years game that kind of just write off what happened last year. And I've seen it way too much, granted it's usually from very stupid people (like the "analysts" on ESPN).
|
11 years 1 month
# | Article from Clevland.com "Can Virginia Tech beat Ohio State? A 10 percent chance the Buckeyes could lose" Your point is a good one.
I guess from someone who followed him from game 1 thru game 12, you do tend to go toward the idea that if he had faced VT later in the year, he would have done much better. Either experience is a great teacher, or it is meaningless. I don't think it's an insult to VT if you conclude that a guy who broke all kinds of records for TD's, passing efficiency, etc got better as the year went along. You can still credit for VT having a defense, that we all recognize, was very, very good.
well of course we got lucky. We only did so well against him because he had spent the whole summer preparing for Navy's triple option.
|
11 years 1 month
# | Article from Clevland.com "Can Virginia Tech beat Ohio State? A 10 percent chance the Buckeyes could lose" The 85 scholarship creates depth issues. Unless you hit on every recruit, you will have depth issues, especially when you throw in injuries and transfers. IMO, one of the major reasons Ohio State was able to beat Alabama was because the Tide didn't have enough quality LB's healthy to stop Ezekiel Elliot. I also think Oregon was really hurt by not having quality receivers due to injuries and suspensions. It affects everyone, even the blue bloods who recruit the best players. Adding onto that, what is the difference between a 3 star and a 4, or even 5, star? HS achievement, an inch of height, 10 lbs of weight, a .1 sec of 40 time, and a bunch of human opinion. The list of 5 star guys who couldn't play at the college level is long, as is the list of 2 and 3 star guys who were magnificent.
We win by 1 point last year? What happens? I don't know. Young teams need time and experience to play around their potential. I think the loss was good for them early in the year, but my gut tells me that they still wouldn't have gotten there without two events in late Nov. During the scUM week, one of their teammates crawled into a dumpster and shot himself in the head. In the game, JT Barrett broke his leg. I sense those 2 things drew that team closer together, and allowed them to be better than they were.
|
11 years 1 month
# | Article from Clevland.com "Can Virginia Tech beat Ohio State? A 10 percent chance the Buckeyes could lose" I love that you always hear the "It was only Barrett's second start" argument. In his game before they played us he played ok, not great but by no means bad. In every game after our game he played Big 10 player of the year caliber, but apparently week 2 we just got lucky.
Your argument is inconsistent. You say below you don't have a problem playing OSU but you then say there is a greater injury risk in games that are "entertaining." Which is it? Are you worried about injuries or not?
Besides, that's a bogus argument anyway. Lee Suggs blew his knee out against UCONN. Shai Mckenzie blew his out against WMU, not OSU.
And why play a schedule similar to our competition? Maybe we set the trends instead of follow them? Or follow UVA's lead, they certainly looked like competition last November.
I really don't care if it actually is mathematically the #1 play. Can we just make the Donovan Riley pick 6 be the top play of the last 10 years? And can #2 just be the start of the #JacoryHarrisHeismanWatch game?
I can start doing that and solar storms too if you'd like?
yeah, I guess we have different points. I see a regular season game with an OSU type of opponent as equal to a bowl game. It's exciting, it's interesting. I want more of it. Last winter, I took the kids out for pizza during the bowl game. Watched it later. It wasn't that interesting. I planned my day around seeing the OSU game.
So if an OSU level game truly is better than a bowl game (playing them at home! beating them in the shoe!), then why not schedule as many of those games as you can? Maybe you win some, maybe you lose some. But you're not playing Furman. Or Ferrum. Whichever one we play.
I don't care what everyone else is doing. I don't care if it keeps us out of the top 25. Win your ACC games and you get another chance at an interesting matchup. Don't win your ACC games, you miss out on a bowl game against Rutgers. You don't need a Rutgers game in a 1/10th full stadium on a Tuesday night in December when you could schedule a game in Autzen Stadium on a Saturday night in September. I want to play as many interesting games as we can. Right now, we are committed to play 8 ACC games, of which about 5 are interesting. I want the other 4 to be great games, not one great game and 3 games to pad your record so you don't lose a meaningless bowl streak. Or, worse, you lose to ECU or JMU.....
My goal is to be entertained. Your goal is to be validated by the top 25 or by national perception or something.
Never mind that Indiana stymied Ohio State for 3 quarters with a bear front out of their base 3-4, until the skill level of Indiana's linebackers/safeties and a couple of fortuitous no-calls led to the game breaking open late.
There seems to be an odd notion among them that only top 10 teams possess talent or skill. Many OSU fans still think of VT as a program with little in the way of talent but with good/great coaches. Not all, but many. Combine that with a great end of the year last year and you get the confidence you're seeing.
That Other Site? Which opens up a whole bunch of possibilities.
The Old Speakeasy? which is not much of a bar to clear (bada bing!)
Gotta love Frank Beamer if you love CFB.
Q: Didn't see the part about "pressure is playing Ohio State" part of the story. Where did that come from?
What do you think? Is it better to open with a quality opponent or a directional-type school? Is the focus and intensity you get preparing for a good opponent a net plus or minus if you take a loss?
Ok, let's say proximity doesn't matter then. Then wouldn't you want your HC out closing on top recruits that are from different states that have had less exposure to VT and the brand? (the root of this debate)
I think largely proximity does matter to most recruits thought perhaps less and less to top recruits. I do agree that recruiting is more national than ever and will continue to be so in the future. But VT should never not try to lock down the homegrown talent to focus more on national talent. That's a losing strategy. We need to win more recruiting battles at home and branch out more and more out of state.
|
11 years 1 month
# | Hokies Send Out a Slew of Offers to 2017 Prospects Following June Camp Session haven't heard much on him lately but prior it had seemed like a fsu/vt battle.
thank you and proximity matters to FB who he is trying to defend, so he's making no sense. I have 0 faith in us being able to lock down VA like Alabama is locked down for Alabama/auburn, but landing some of the top 5 every now and then would be wonderful especially at positions of need with immediate PT being able to be used as an incentive.
I think Caleb will be a case study in the differences between Moorehead and Burden as WR coaches. Burden's past work has shown that he can work with kids that weren't WRs in high school or even recruited as WRs and make them successful. As much as we loved Moorehead, he was relatively new to coaching. He doesn't really have enough coaching experience to point to as evidence that he can or cannot successfully convert ATHs to WRs. I think that Burden's coaching past definitely benefits Caleb, perhaps more so than Moorehead's did.
The information has always been there, it's just a little easier to find now. It's meant to be a way to publicly recognize HC donors. Of course, anyone who wishes to remain anonymous has the option to do so.

I hope he feels this strongly about losing out on blue-chip recruits too. I read some news about other head coaches flying in doing home visits the day before a recruit's decision. I feel like Frank should do everything possible to land these guys as well. Hopefully he has the competitive fire burning in regards to recruiting.
Edit: to clarify, I like Frank Beamer a lot, and my purpose for this post wasn't to slight him. When I read this story, I just wondered what he thinks about all the recruiting misses we've had. Does he get as mad at losing out on a recruiting miss as he does when he directly loses a competition? The only reason I threw out that example, is because I don't think it exists in a vacuum. If you do a simple google search on Nick Saban and in-home visits, you'll see tons of results of him visiting even recruits in VA (e.g. Dashawn Hand). If you replace Nick Saban's name with Frank Beamer, how many results are returned? It's basically non-existent. Of course, it could be just coincidental that no one ever reports on Frank Beamer's visits, but I find that more unlikely than if he isn't really doing many in-home visits with top recruits. But yes, I obviously don't have all the evidence, so I could be wrong.
Well that's the thing. I firmly believe 'proximity matters' is a completely irrelevant argument in the internet and smartphone age. And judging from what is happening in recruiting in not only Virginia, but pretty much every other state across the country, that appears to be true.
And sure, we're not going to get a bunch of kids from Cali, but that isn't stopping those kids from going to Oregon, Boise, Utah, Arizona, or kids from Texas going to just about every program in the country, or kids from the Great Lakes making their way into SEC country, or stopping us from annually picking up a kid or 2 from Florida. In state means nothing in this recruiting landscape.
What's the word on Devon Hunter?

