Recent Comments

Better be careful, you seem to be developing a case of the Corgis.

I couldn't agree more.

Look: looking at how many players we lose to teams that are already stacked with 4*s at the same position, I don't know just how much improvement we can hope to have without a recent resume of marquee wins.

I do like the direction our recruiting is headed.

I love the Blacksburg area. Grew up in Craig county. But there are certain features that make it a hard sell for the average teen where "fun" is based on amenities that Bburg has in short supply, or doesn't have at all.

But there are certainly attainable goals for recruiting improvement, and one of the avenues to reaching those goals is to recognize that "gentleman's" rules regarding recruiting are a suicide pact. You recruit the players you want until signing day.

You can bet your ass your competitors are.

Town of Christiansburg plowing has not come by the house on either adjacent street (corner lot) yet. I am a little disappointed in them, I live right off 114 not far from the mall not in the middle of nowhere.

I down vote when someone's opinion is poorly researched, conceived or lacks a quantifiable basis in reality....as well as an offensive post. It's okay to gave opinions for which I disagree, it's not okay to regurgitate some stupid shit. We gotta protect the quality of this forum or it will devolve like the rest of them.

When you ask Mom for some ice cream, do you ask for a slice of ice cream? No.
When you go to Baskin and Robbins, do you ask for a slice of ice cream? No. You ask for scoops. How many scoops would you like on that cone? 3 please.

When you are served ice cream cake, do you ask for 3 scoops of ice cream cake? No, you ask politely for a big slice.

You have already conceded that it's not cake. That leaves pie.

Your flimsy argument against it being pie? I don't think it qualifies. Can't even enumerate your objections so, you know in your heart that, it's pie.

Fess up and got yerself a nice big slice.

Would add an interesting wrinkle to the QB battle. Probably closer to the Ford-style quarterback (and Michigan Loeffler), if we think in terms of current/committed QBs, and has the benefit of having playing time experience (probably more so than Leal). Could be very interesting if he ends up here.

AP's Ralph D Russo reports Tech has contacted him: http://collegefootball.ap.org/article/transferring-usc-qb-max-wittek-vas....

Wittek is on target to graduate with a degree in psychology in May. He will be eligible to play next season, and have two years left.

He says he has also heard from coaches at Louisville, Virginia Tech, Hawaii and TCU. He says he is in no rush to make a decision and Texas should not be perceived as a front-runner. The Longhorns with new coach Charlie Strong were the first to contact him.

Wittek says he is not close to narrowing down his choices and plans to make more trips.

Being able to play next season and having two years of eligibility makes him all the more desirable. (Is there a better word to use there?)

Tech runs an offense. Most college teams against man to man run a motion offense with different derived variances depending on how the defense is guarding, switching, and helping, or sometimes a flex offense for some teams. (but this is not a "set" play) "Set" plays are more situational and are not run continuous in an offense. They are called and they are ran but not as much as you think (and this is dependent on the coach). This isn't football where the coach will call in a play every time we have possession. The only "set" play run consistently (by VT) are inbound plays (either under the baseline or sideline out); however, situationally we call set plays in the half court.

I think there is some confusion to what a set play really is. A set play is a strategically planned and choreographed play to get open shots and score points. Generally speaking the sequence is run through just one time (where as our offense runs continuously). Set plays are quick hitters to score points at a certain key point during the game. They should not be your entire offensive system and it is almost non existent that a college team will run their entire offense with just set plays. An example of a set play used in college would be we are in time out and there is 4 seconds on the shot clock and we are inbounding under the basket. Here we would call a set play, in this case and inbound play. When our PG is walking up the court into half court and looks back at JJ he is for the most part seeing what variation of motion to run and making sure he is seeing what the coach is seeing and they are on the same page. I would be willing to bet that we only have a handful of set plays for given situations and i am also willing to bet that most of these are entry or inbound plays. The amount of set plays a team has depends on how experienced the coach is.

Ah, must have skipped over that part, just wanted to make sure you wouldn't be lacking.

JJ's getting another year. I'm at least 85% sure of that, and honestly it doesn't matter what anyone thinks about him other than Babcock. I know people aren't going to want to hear it, but a big reason to keep him? The super cheap contracts of him and his staffs, as then Babcock has a year of change in the fundraising department.

I know that this will probably rile people up, but I think he should get another year as well. Selfishly, I want to see this press that they have engaged (with some success, I might add) used in a larger quantity, which will only come when they get Mueller and the three guards from this incoming class. You can't say that you've "seen enough of JJ" when you've only been able to see about half of him.

well send 'em down our way because all we've gotten is one swipe from a pickup with a blade on it and it snowed like hell after he came through. there are 18 inches on the street in front of my house.

Packers have a similar player to Hopkins in Mike Daniels who is undersized but was great in the sub package with 6.5 sacks on the year. Would love the Pack to develop Hopkins the same way :)

Had 14" here near Dulles. Roads seem plowed now for the most part (even the neighborhoods).

If the St. Bernard isn't available, my corgi is ready for the task.

This is my theory:

The team is young and the motion offense we run can often times become very rote or repetitive in nature in its execution. Instead of reading their defenders, i think our players are more concerned with maintaining the continuity and filling into spots and never fully taking advantage of what the defense gives them (in short they are flustered and thinking too much). Motion offense is about reading what the defense is giving you and spreading the court. They look so concerned about going thru the motion instead of reading their defenders. We are thinking too much about it and that will lead to more players standing around. I don't think we have the experience or enough talent to run this effectively against ACC defenses. Motion offenses also are also ideal for great 3 pt shooting teams and teams with excellent guard play because lanes are more open from spacing for dribble drive penetration. This is why Duke's motion offense is so effective.

Ive seen us play some flex before. The flex essentially opens up the two most easy shots in the game, the elbow jump shot or the underneath layup. I think it would be a better offense for our team to run, however the flex is very easy to defend for teams that are sound on defense (most ACC defenses) so its almost like we are damned either way where the flex is to simple to defend and motion is too much for us to run. The flex also requires good interior forward play and a good "finisher" player. Maryland basically won the national title years ago with this offense. They ran it probably 60% of the time. They had no real 3 pt threat and and average at best guard play, but what they did have was good forwards and a good finisher (Juan Dixon). We ran alot more flex back in 07/08 (probably 70/30 motion/flex). We had a finisher with Deron and better forwards then.

I think our problem is more so the talent isn't there (compared to other ACC teams), experience (from the coaches to the players), and our defense isn't what it used to be. No matter how many points we score we need to be able to stop the other offense. I think this is on everyone though from coaching down to players.

When I compared VT to about 20 or so other schools of all shapes and sizes, I was struck by how provincial VT's recruiting has been compared to others. Beamer's philosophy of staying close to home is certainly borne out here and I wonder if the lack of in-state recruits this year was a function of a changing philosophy as much as losing out on some recruits (excepting the top 5 guys of course).

FWIW, Pitt looked similar to VT -- and surprisingly UVa had a fairly small radius for most of its recruits.

Pages