Recent Comments
There's several threads dedicated to this topic already:
Namely here and here.
🚀🛡️
|
12 years 6 months
# | "...especially with a weak non-conference schedule that includes Navy, Virginia Tech and Cincinnati..." I understand that. What I'm saying though is regardless of how you get there, once you're close it only takes one or two lucky bounces to get you to the top, as I keep pointing out happened to Auburn this year. Regardless of if there's room for improvement or not, I have no problem with continuing to do the same thing as long as it kept getting us close. As we saw this year, the changes don't necessarily manifest themselves into wins immediately, and as a result we're not in the position we had been used to in previous years, although many would say the "dumpster fire" is being addressed now.
I still believe that you shouldn't make changes after a 10 win season. If we had made the changes after the Sugar Bowl, maybe we would have had a better record this year, but why on Earth would you make a change after an 11-3 season? I highly doubt anyone predicted what would happen the next year.
Tech closes to 53-51. Wilson still struggling at the line.
I think if the whiners score on this drive they will win it. Seattle is just not composed this game on offense.
And Kam makes an appearance. Thought he wouldn't wrap up for a second.
Chancellor just saved a TD. Damn.
I think it is fair counter-argument that Bostad is much more familiar with area VT wants to recruit. Although Grimes was able to make inroads quickly in the midwest, Bostad has been getting his recruits all over B1G country. Looking at rivals, Wiscy pulled recruits from OH, IN, IL, MI, MN, WI & MD during his tenure. Not sure if VT would try and recruit in MI, MN or WI, but definitely want to continue to recruit OH, IN, MD, and add in PA.
Not unless you mean women's lacrosse. We don't have a varsity men's team.
|
12 years 6 months
# | "...especially with a weak non-conference schedule that includes Navy, Virginia Tech and Cincinnati..." WADR, it was obvious it wasn't working long before the offensive ineptitude manifested itself in mediocre seasons.
This is the whole notion of "risk" you take the risk and proactively address the obvious problem before it manifests itself in the dumpster fire we see now.
R. Wilson not showing good QB technique or composure.
Solid start to the second half Score now 44-37 ND.
|
12 years 6 months
# | "...especially with a weak non-conference schedule that includes Navy, Virginia Tech and Cincinnati..." We needed the bounces to get the 10 wins several of those years. So all we needed was a couple more bounces on top of those bounces?
That's my point, that's an awful lot of bounces. We disagree on the number of allowable bounces before a strategy becomes a hope/prayer.
Harbaugh must be livid with these penalties.
That 12th man at Qwest did their job. Got the whiners to do a false start on 4th & Logan (or Kaepernick).
OK...that answers my question. I was under impression and assuming they were employed at Texas and Wisky. Now it makes sense. Thanks
Washington was oc and o line coach at u of San Diego
Grimes was laid off at Auburn like Searles was at UT and Bostad at Tampa Bay. Verdicts is currently employed.....in...Canada. They pay with smoked fish.
Yes, in 1987 he was fired...from a cannon on to the FBS College football landscape. BOOM!
R. Wilson looks nervous as fuck. Looks like a deer in headlights. That offense need to get their shit rolling.
Not a great start for R. Wilson. He was like derp on the first play of the game.
It used to be just Eli that p*wnd him. Now BOTH Mannings do.
True. But we should save our angst and sadness for when Beamer retires. That's gonna be a hard pill to swallow.
Really bad end to the half between turnovers and wasted opportunities. ND39-Tech 24
I know. We should be very thankful for the stability we have had over the years. Just stinks to see a guy we liked go after 1 year.
No