Recent Comments

Agree - there were plays that were very Loeffler'esque last night. I bet he studies Malzahn (as will everyone else) in the offseason to see what tweaks he can make the the veer, inverted veer, zone read, etc. Could be very interesting to see a QB that fits Loeffler's style (Ford) take advantage. If there is one thing that Malzahn did well all season it was to play to the strengths of hte players. Loeffler does the same thing.

The trick would be getting 260-330 lb. dudes to sustain that volume of physical output.

The fact that the next three teams in the bowl order lost -- Duke to Texas A&M in the Chick-fil-A, Miami to Louisville in the Russell Athletic and Virginia Tech to UCLA in the Sun -- underscores how top-heavy the conference was this year, with FSU and Clemson well ahead of a pack of mediocrity.

Come on Andy, I know it helps your point but the Duke-A&M game could have easily gone the other way. If anything it shows the cyclical nature of college football that a storied program like TAM could lose to Duke.

I tend to agree, I think we took Durkin because, worse comes to worse, we can run him like a bull.

At one point, I was really excited for Sean Glennon to be the QB because if we were going to succeed, we were going to have to have superior schemes and execute a grown-up offense. Unfortunately, Glennon either couldn't handle pressure or he received too much of it (or both). I see Ford similarly, if we are going to succeed with Drew Ford as our QB, then we are going to have to have a sophisticated enough concept. It won't be the VT gameplan against UVA in 2012.

No worries. I love a good football discussion as much as the next guy. +1 Like I said I was just trying to understand where you were coming from. Anyway, one thing is for sure, there will be plenty of backup QB discussion going forward into 2014 season to keep us occupied.

Yes for the love of God. I have been dying for this program to start utilizing TEs in the offense for over a decade.

I mean really, we want to be a "run-first, ball-control, smash-mouth" offense, but *not* have TEs as one of, if not the primary recieving threat? How does that even work? Oh wait *checks last decade of offense* it doesn't.

Highlight of my offseason will be tying the ole knot. I thought my honeymoon would end my streak of attending the Spring game but then I saw this

which made me happy!

Pages