Recent Comments
wat
Why bother? Some of these players make more in a year than the expected value of the degrees they would achieve.
He was *Randy* Quaid in Major League, an endless pessimist with rare glimpses of happiness. As long as he wasn't insulting or harshly offending people on here, I would be for him being back. Especially when we make the playoffs I will need this kinda energy:
:
Backdoor 5 for 5 rule. It allows guys to get as close to a full year of competition as possible without actually changing from the 4 years and redshirt formula.
It's nice that there's no pesky dentists involved to drop that to a 9/10 recommendation.
It doesn't help I'm a leg guy. But her and Natalie Portman have both been my celebrity crushes since I was like 13. Now that I'm old and married, they're now (what some may call) my hall passes, having had preapproved permission from the wife of course.
the schools are the NCAA
Hmmm, timing seems to line up well with Faheem Delane entering portal 🤷🏼♂️
never, ever wonder why the NCAA loses every time it goes to court
The correct answer...the one that will withstand court challenge...is FIVE. The rule should state that An athlete can participate in NCAA sponsored sports in no more than five academic calendar years. Why five? Because that is the amount of time it takes to complete the necessary academic requirements for an undergraduate degree.
Tie ALL eligibility rules to academics (because that is why you get non-profit tax status) and your rules are bullet proof. Fuck around trying to achieve some other type of outcome for administrative, monetary, or some other tactical non-academic reason and LOSE every, single, time.
Just remember... there are ample examples (including this) that prove that when the schools want to change something, they do so quickly.
So everything that isn't changing... it's because the schools (not the ncaa) don't want to.
Yeah this is exactly what will happen. So dumb
I mean we all want Noah chambers for another season if possible, he only played 8 games. Robinson was in 9 games.
Correct. And you understand why a coach would want this rule -- players have been using the redshirt to preemptively sit out to preserve eligibility if the beginning of the season hasnt gone the way they wanted it to.
You can see his leg count on his profile though same with French or Shelton or any one that works for the site
Per 247 Sports, Colby Crawford has upped his Crystal Ball prediction to 10/10 at 0833 pm on 1/13/2026. Note: Grunk does have 2 CB for VT.
Joe Montana confirmed...
You get an extra year. YOU get an extra year. Ev-reee-body gets an extra year!
Next up:
Previous players lawyer up for one more year of eligibility under the new rule. Ya got that lucrative new NIL to play for.
Respectfully disagree. Towards the end it felt like he had a hard time agreeing with even what color the sky was. It began to actively degrade my browsing experience knowing there'd be an argument that moved goalposts in every discussion
This could create some interesting dynamics. Are all players now load managed throughout the season to stay at <9 games? Does. QB1 now sit for the 'easy' games? Basically you rotate and never have your full team until the playoffs...
That just means...
... you're male. Well, maybe.
Are they even pretending it's about education anymore?
They don't want that. They want endless eligibility.
I still want to say...
But my head is still whispering...