Recent Comments
Asking because I honestly dont know - I'm looking at the OL and CB positions specifically - are these numbers roughly what they should be? To me both of these dont look right, with possibly too many on OL and too few in the secondary.
Good call. I'll add that once the portal window is in full swing.
I am working on it.
I have given up on adding columns for class year or eligibility, but the formatting will shown commit vs transfer status. I'll be adjusting the format a few times over the weekend so it looks better on TKP from a desktop at least.
You mean cosplay Mahomes?
I'd be interested in Prior & Future School columns like the coaching carousel table.
i appreciate you putting this together. A lot of names here I do not recognize.
While I recognize eligibility is no longer a thing, it would help me to have something that allows me to see who is a new recruit, who has played for VT some in previous years, and who has been here but never contributed.
edit - you changed the chart faster than I can type!
Yes Please!
He has become one of the perennially injured USMNT guys where if hes fit great but the trend is becoming more and more that he is just banged up alot of the time.
Penn State EDGE Chaz Coleman will enter the portal. Bring him home?
BREAKING: Penn State true freshman EDGE Chaz Coleman plans to enter the @TransferPortal, he tells @On3sports The 6'5 245 EDGE will have 3 years of eligibility lefthttps://t.co/RlUbB6EMhS pic.twitter.com/TRcspPN4QR— Hayes Fawcett (@Hayesfawcett3) December 18, 2025
First reaction hiring rankings:
1. Florida
2. UCLA
3. Iowa State
4. LSU
5. Penn State
6. Toledo
7. Auburn
8. Kansas State
9. Virginia Tech
10. Oklahoma State
11. Coastal Carolina
12. Cal
13. Memphis
14. Kentucky
15. Colorado State
16. North Texas
17. Washington State
18. Ole Miss
19. Southern Miss
20. Arkansas
21. JMU
22. UAB
23. Michigan State
24. USF
25. Tulane
26. Stanford
27. Uconn
28. Oregon State
You: Pry is a bad DC.
Me: He had top 10 defenses at Penn State
You: He's only good with elite talent.
That isn't context that I can't follow, that's you changing your narrative from him being a purely bad DC, to he's only bad if he doesn't have elite talent. Which you didn't actually provide any evidence for, such as times he was DC and had very poorly performing defenses, other than that you thought he was DC here for a year, and I previously pointed out that he was not.
In your case, you kept changing your argument to support your notion, then just stated the opposite of someone with absolutely no reasoning.
It's totally consistent and I explained it out multiple times, if you can't follow it that's not my problem. Adding more context (that you asked for) is not changing the overall idea.
When you use words like stupidity, spinelessness, and audacity, that's just bitching.
Agree to disagree, he's being a bit hyperbolic and I rolled my eyes reading it but that doesn't dismiss the point. And love it or hate, it does take a lot of audacity to bring back the guy that just got fired
Maybe we finally break out of our shooting slump. We can hope.
Looking like it isn't GT
I thought when all that came out several years ago they were done for. It seemed like a really open and shut case (and explained why France and Switzerland always had the easiest draws among other things).
So finding that out today was surprising, but I guess not surprising given the overall state of the world
the ambiguity of the statement is....well, something
Pribula-y
HOKIES!
When you use words like stupidity, spinelessness, and audacity, that's just bitching. If you give thought out rationale as to why you disagree with something, that's having a discussion and hoping for a well-reasoned response.
In your case, you kept changing your argument to support your notion, then just stated the opposite of someone with absolutely no reasoning.
I don't mind if people have different opinions than me, I just ask that they provide some thought behind it and then we can discuss. I'm even willing to change my opinion if someone else can give me a better reasoning for their stance than I have for mine. Some people will blindly look for people who believe the same as they do, and take consensus to be stronger than reason. I like learning, so I like hearing WHY people think what they do. And even if someone has the same opinion as me, but based on poor reasoning, I'll question them on that as well.
So no, having an opinion different than mine is not bitching, but what Bud Foster's Agent was doing was definitely bitching.
The way they've been shooting, I fear this will not be a pretty game. They are talented, and all capable of contributing, but the obvious slump concerns me. And free throws. But, I'll watch and hope and yell...
LET'S GO...
I'm not sure "FIFA officials get off on corruption charges" really qualifies as news. It's in the same category as "water is wet."
And again...Yup.
He probably does. It's not the most exciting option, but it probably isn't too high a cost so lets us spend on other positions. I'm fine with it for one year, it's an upgrade over the previous 3 years, but there are definitely better options in the portal. I would love to see Minchey or Van Buren (not in the portal).
Join The Key Player's Club to read comments posted in exclusive content and its members only forum.
Can you elaborate on the evaluation criteria for this list?