
Raise your hand if you thought BC would score 34 on us...anyone? Anyone?
The difference between last week and this week is that last week we wanted the numbers to be right, while this week we're hoping they're wrong.
The Basics
Here's how we compare both in terms of computer rankings and predictions:


Not surprisingly, virtually every computer predicts a Miami win by about 5-10 points. The good news is that predicting a game with as much luck and randomness as football is highly difficult, and it's quite common for games to swing at least 5-10 points from their prediction. In fact, I bet it's more likely to be wrong by at least 7 than to be within 7. If you can predict within 7 more than 50% of the time and have a big sample size, call me because we're going to Vegas and I'm paying...
One note I'd like to make about our predictions is that every week, we have one of the most consistently predicted games, most likely because our games are expected to be low-scoring (fist-bumps our defense; flashes an "L" on the forehead to the offense). The problem with low-score, low-variation games is that they can swing on just one or two plays. I'm not sure if that has happened to us because I am unaware of anything that has happened to Hokie football in the past two weeks and assume we are 8-1 and let's just move on now...
Overall Comparisons
So who's better on offense and defense? Surprisingly we get a tiny edge overall but that is easily overcome by home-field advantage:


Although we've dropped to the No. 2 defense in S&P+ ratings (if you don't know to whom, you apparently didn't see any B1G highlights from last week), we're still in possession of an incredible ranking. That said, Miami is in possession of a strong offensive ranking as well so we don't have quite the advantage we are used to.
Pass-Run Personalities
So how do we stack up against Miami in terms of pass-run strengths? Keep in mind with these that offenses tend to have the advantage over defenses:


Miami's offensive advantage on passing downs is scary — keep in mind passing downs doesn't necessarily mean a team will pass, but instead that they're in a passing situation. A strong advantage there means a team is capable of gaining enough yardage despite the defense knowing they need it. If you want to visualize an extreme case of a strong offensive passing down advantage, imagine your frustration at a team coming back to win against a prevent defense.
On offense, VT's rushing rating against their rating defense is the only glimmer of hope. I hear plenty of fans complaining about our running game, and I think that needs to be defined a little better — our running game is not terrible. The problem is Logan Thomas gains the yards and not the tailbacks.
Offense/Defense Personalities
So what kind of personality does each team have relative to the other? Let's start with our defense against their offense:

I wouldn't read too much into the slight differences here. Basically, we have a slight advantage in every aspect. Who should each team's unit remind you of?
Miami's Offensive Clones
- Northern Illinois
- Houston
- Notre Dame
Virginia Tech's Defense Clones
- We invent the future, so if we could do this type of cloning we would need a lot of Fuller jerseys
- BYU
- Alabama
- Cincinnati
Cincinnati comes up every week. They are basically a poor man's version of our defense. Not nearly as good, but matching up almost perfectly in terms of personality.
So how about our offense against their defense?

Anyone want some methodical drives (10+ plays)? I hope so, because I'm not seeing much else happening here.
Virginia Tech's Offensive Clones (Assuming #AnyFuller4QB is not successful before Saturday)
- Louisiana-Monroe
- Wake Forest
- Akron
I'll let that sink in for a minute. Back in your chair? Good.
Miami's Defensive Clones
- Houston
- South Carolina*
- Penn State
*Miami does not, in fact, possess either a Clowney or a Fuller.

Comments
We need to get that Fuller cloning in gear. The time to invent the future is now.
Working on a plan to match up the Fuller brothers with extremely fertile, athletic women who have a family history of multiples (twins, triplets, etc). I'll keep you posted.
Let's make it a stated goal to start 22 Fullers within 22 years.
Funny you mention that. The parents Wang are both former Chinese Olympic athletes. Athlete + athlete = super athletic babies.
Exhibit A:
Make sure they are HOT fertile athletic women.
How many TDs did we score against Alabama?
You really think the U defense is better than them and the U offense gives us worse field position?
Everyone should quit psyching themselves out. That game proved that with getting some more experience on the kicking squad and not tossing INTs, we can beat anyone.
Our kicking team has improved a lot since then and we proved we can protect the football.
FSU could be real tough but Miami we should be able to beat handily.
Go Hokies. Play hard, play smart and protect the football.
^This. I have been feeling the exact same way this week.
Alabama hasn't given up a sack in 17 quarters.
How many did we get?
4. McCarron's QB Rating was 23, and that's on the CFB scale that goes to about 200.
In Saban's tenure, no team has ever dominated his O like the Hokies.
That's what's great about the numbers...they adjust for opponent, luck, etc. So you can see more clearly that we're not some hopeless underdog and can hold our own, especially on defense.
Alabama's offense might be the most underrated in the country...everyone thinks they are just a game management offense but they are really, really good. We shut their offense down.
Miami is not going to roll over us on offense. Our D is really damn good and they will have difficulty. We only lost the last two games because of field position given up by turnovers. Take that away and those games aren't close.
Sack up and get ready to hit the U right in their damn mouths!
Get up there and sing it to me man.
The Hokies rule. Other teams don't beat us. We only lose when we make the mistakes ourselves.
Play with heart, play with your head and we win out.
Go Hokies.
The averages were just destroyed tonight..it's amazing what you can do on offense when you backs can pick up 4 yards a carry.
Just for the record, that was a bad Miami team that played well and still lost.
No turnovers from their offense, which scored more than I expected they would, esp in the rain. Their defense wasn't bad either, but our offense still ate their lunch; the blocking was great tonight. Their special teams essentially had three turnovers, and VT actually made them pay dearly each time.
But just for the record, Miami is an under-achieving group that hasn't changed its stripes. They beat a miserable Florida team to jump into the top 15, and kept winning (barely) against Carolina schools. Now I have to root for them against Duke, who is probably the better team.
Thankfully they were ripe for the picking and Logan did just that. Everybody on offense played great tonight, and the defense did its job too. Always great to beat Da U.
You could always root for Duke against Miami and then UNC when Duke goes there to end the season.
I don't know about you guys, but I'm rooting for Georgia Tech on Thursday. If they win and we win out, we go to Charlotte. Worst-case is a 3-way tie with Duke and GT, and we take that tiebreaker on division record (4-1 to 3-2).
That and I would find it hysterical for Duke to finish the season 11-2, as long as it doesn't impede our chances of going to Charlotte in early December.
Doesn't win percentage factor into that degree of tiebreaker? In that case, Duke would go given their record (10-2) would be better than our record (9-3).
Only after a few more levels of tiebreaking. Divisional record prevails in this scenario.
Nope. For a 3-way tie, it's division record first.
http://www.theacc.com/#!/page/ACC-Football-Championship-Tiebreakers
The only place that overall record comes into play at a for a 3-way tie is #7, where the highest team in the BCS standings is selected. In the case of a Duke-GT-VT tie at 6-2, it would end at #2 like I said above.
I'm not, for pretty much one reason: FSU
I want to see FSU in the MNC vs Alabama. These, to me, look like the two best teams in the country. But if Clemson loses to GT (maybe) and then USCe (likely), then FSU's best win is against...Miami? Duke/VT in the ACCCG? Not Florida, that's for sure. What happens to OSU's SOS when they play a 1-loss MSU in the Big Ten CG? The computers might like OSU more than FSU, and with enough voters, then we might see OSU sneak by FSU. No thanks.
However, your point about GT/Duke is solid. But this year, I'd kinda like to let Duke have their day. Against FSU. In the ACCCG. I don't think we'd win that game anyway (pessimistic, I know, but also realistic).
In other words, I hope Clemson wins out, we win out, and then let the chips fall wherever they may otherwise.