
It's that time folks, my favorite time of the year. While most of Hokie Nation loathes the discussion about an unconventional offense, cut blocks, and Paul Johnson's sour puss, I enjoy the film prep for Georgia Tech week because, like it or not, Georgia Tech is one of the few teams that understands how to effectively run block. There's a soft spot in my heart for their approach because it is how I was taught football should be played. Their blocking technique emphasizes quickness and blocking low, which sometimes does lead to illegal chop blocks when two players engage. Johnson's offense forces defenders to play an assignment, play low and tackle again, and again, and again. As Bud Foster told The Key Play over the summer, "They're a pain in the tail. We change our whole scheme for that game. We probably had more [coaches] try to come and talk to us about that as much as anything."
For fans, the matchups between the Hokies and the Ramblin Wreck have not been for the faint of heart. This year's Yellow Jackets bring to Blacksburg an offense that has looked terrific against overmatched opposition and a defense that looks, well, not so wonderful against the same opposition. Expect another hard hitting, leg-flying, stressful afternoon in Blacksburg.
Georgia Tech run a flexbone triple option based offense. While the alignment can change, the base set is a "B-Back" that lines up directly behind the quarterback. Conventional offenses would refer to him as a fullback, but he's not just a blocker in the flexbone. Then the Yellow Jackets feature two "A-Backs" that align a step back from each offensive tackle. While sometimes the Yellow Jackets will use a tight end, most often they will use two wide receivers.

A "triple option" play means that the quarterback has three options where the ball should go, based on quick reads of unblocked defenders. At the snap, the quarterback will open up and create a mesh point with the B-Back and read an unblocked defender, usually a defensive end. If the end crashes hard to the inside to take away the dive, the quarterback keeps the ball. If he stays outside, the quarterback will hand the ball to the B-Back up the gut. B-Back Zach Laskey is 6-1, 218 and is very experienced. He also has terrific speed compared to a traditional fullback, so even a small seam can turn into a big play.
Here is the handoff to the B-Back Laskey on the dive.
Here is the keeper. Note how the outside linebacker tackles the B-Back, and the quarterback keeps the ball.
After the first mesh point, the quarterback runs to the sideline, maintaining the appropriate distance or "pitch relationship" to his play side A-Back. In football lexicon, "pitch relationship" means making sure that the back is close enough to the quarterback to take an effective pitch, but not too close that one defender can defend two potential ball carriers. If the second option man takes the quarterback, the quarterback pitches the ball. If the second option man takes the pitch, the quarterback keeps.
Here is Georgia Tech executing the pitch. Note how the outside linebacker takes the dive. The safety takes the quarterback, and the pitch is open.
Several varieties of the triple option can be run from the flexbone. Above I described a base triple option that first reads the defensive end. Johnson can call a midline option, which means the offense will leave a defensive tackle unblocked and the QB will read him.
The third is a counter option, meaning the quarterback may create a mesh point with the B-Back to one side, but if the QB keeps, he spins around to establish pitch relationship with the pitch man going in the opposite direction.
To go with their option package, the Yellow Jackets only run a handful of additional plays. The quick pitch (a pitch out to a in-motion "A-Back") has given the Hokies fits over the years.
In short yardage, the Yellow Jackets often turn to their version of a power play called a "double dive" or "B-Back lead." On this play, the quarterback fakes the dive to the B-Back, and then follows the B-Back (who effectively becomes the lead blocker) right into the hole. Here, they execute the play as a "belly" play, meaning the B-Back goes off tackle rather than right off the center. Georgia Tech ran this "belly" double dive look, with the B-Back either keeping or the quarterback following him, more times in the first two series against Georgia Southern than I can recall them running against the Hokies since Paul Johnson became the head coach.
It looks like a triple option, however, note how the B-Back takes an outside angle, and Georgia Tech pulls a guard to trap the defensive end instead of leaving the end unblocked to option. Georgia Tech loves varieties of this play in short yardage situations. Quarterback Justin Thomas is a 5-11 fireplug, but he is much more natural as a runner executing the option than last year's quarterback Vad Lee.
Over the years, Bud Foster's approach to defending this system has varied wildly, but several things must happen to stop Paul Johnson's offense.
Take away the B-Back dive. The Hokies often devote both defensive tackles, the mike linebacker, and often crash the play side defensive end to take away the dive. The dive doesn't sound sexy, but in Georgia Tech's system, it is the running play that is the most likely to consistently gain big chunks of yards if not defended properly.
Ensure the least threatening runner gets the ball. Since I have started reviewing film for The Key Play, Tevin Washington and Vad Lee have more often than not been forced to keep on the triple option because Foster concluded they're not as much of a threat as the B-Backs. Plus, the wear and tear that comes from getting 15-plus carries has resulted in those quarterbacks making a mistake late in the game. It will be interesting to see if Foster regards Thomas, who is more natural at executing the option than Washington and Lee, as a more dangerous threat than the group of speedy A-Backs that Johnson rotates throughout the game. If he focuses on stopping the pitchman, expect Thomas to get solid yardage, but take a large number of hits during the game. Using that strategy in the past, the physical and mental wear and tear on Washington and Lee seemed to contribute to some poor decisions in executing the option in critical late game situations, including wrong reads on fourth downs, fumbles, and interceptions. The quarterback will start anticipating a read rather than making a read. Foster will then switch assignments at critical moments. Fooled, the quarterback gets rocked and puts the ball on the ground. If you go back and watch all the Hokie matchups against Georgia Tech since Josh Nesbitt graduated, you can find a critical mistake generated by a change up in the Hokies option defense late in every game.
Force turnovers and minimize big plays. Coach Foster usually isn't as aggressive against Georgia Tech, and the defense usually concedes some offensive gains. But the more reads the quarterback is forced to make, the more opportunities the Hokies have to force a turnover. Each mesh point and pitch could be a disaster for the Yellow Jackets. Coach Foster wants to keep the Yellow Jackets from scoring quickly to maximize those opportunities for turnovers.
Play with the lead. Much like Ohio State, Georgia Tech can have an effective passing attack, but it works off play-action. If the Bees are forced to throw to get back into a game, their offensive line isn't accustomed to picking up blitzes. Coach Foster loves the boundary corner blitz late in the fourth quarter against Georgia Tech when he has played with the lead. I don't expect that to change.
Even though Paul Johnson's system is very tough to deal with, perhaps no coach has had more success in stopping the flexbone offense than Bud Foster. Foster has tweaked his approach against Georgia Tech over the years, and discussed how the approach the Hokies used against Ohio State came from his work with the Ole Miss staff to combat Georgia Tech. Regardless of if we see Double Eagle \ Bear, the whip playing in an interior gap, or a wacky looking 4-3 with two deep safeties, you can usually expect to see the Hokies using cover 2 and inverted cover 2 against the Yellow Jackets.

Man coverage is not ideal against the triple option. Once run is keyed, every defender has run-stop assignments. Man coverage would allow Georgia Tech's wide receivers to fake go-routes all game, and the Hokie corners would be forced to turn and run with them, effectively taking them out of run support without even being blocked. A cover 2, where the safeties roll out over the top with the corners taking short zones, isn't as effective because your safeties have to run from the middle of the field to take away a fade or go pattern, as demonstrated here by 6-5, 241 pound WR Darren Waller.
Waller slips behind the short corner, and the safety can't get to him. Waller's huge frame gives Thomas an easy target.
But the inverted cover 2 can be very effective. The safeties are coming forward at an angle that puts them in perfect position to defend both the pitch on a triple option or the short flat on a quick screen or play-action. Meanwhile, the corner bails deep, which creates space with the receiver. The corner can then either use his superior speed to avoid the block, or he is already deep to take away a fade route while keeping his eyes in the backfield (instead of being turned around and chasing the ball).
The inverted cover 2 is weakest against a pass down the seams, where the free safety has to cover a large space. The Yellow Jackets have smaller scatback type A-Backs who are fast enough to slip behind the defense, but are usually only dangerous as receivers off play-action when they are wide open. Against coverage in late game situations, those A-Backs are not as much of a threat to get open. I am more worried about straight fly patterns by a pair of gigantic receivers on the outside. 6-3, 222 pound WR DeAndre Smeltzer and Waller are physical specimens that can go up and win jump balls against our corners.
With smaller corner Donovan Riley playing in the place of Brandon Facyson, the Yellow Jacket receivers will have a huge size advantage over both corners. Those receivers run a relatively limited package of routes, with go routes, post routes (that look like crack-back blocks) and quick screens as the primary routes. After last week, expect Georgia Tech to test Riley either with a jump ball or a quick screen early.
The Yellow Jackets always prove to be one of the most challenging opponents for the Hokies. No game on Virginia Tech's schedule is more physical. No game requires more emphasis on fundamental tackling and pursuit. And, with the added wrinkle of an improved passing game, no team presents a more vexing scheme to stop than Georgia Tech. The Hokies have been on the winning side of this rivalry because their defense has prevented big plays while forcing turnovers and then getting just enough offense to get the job done. This week, the Hokies have to "re-learn" how to defend the option with only four days of practice and a tired, beaten up defensive front. Furthermore, while it seems like the young corners may not factor as much against this kind of foe, one mistake over the top in a game where each possession is so critical can put the Hokies behind the eight ball in the Coastal Division.

Comments
Honestly, I am not worried about their not-so-"perfect option" anymore. Foster has proved time and time again if you give him at least a week to prep for the triple option, we should be able to counter it effectively. A loss to GT would surprise me more than the loss to ECU.
French, On the GT defense...any indication that they were leaving the defensive scheme sort of vanilla so they focus on prepping for our offense the last few weeks? I mean...God knows why anyone would feel the need to do EXTRA prep for our offense, but I've heard a couple people say we didn't adjust our scheme that much from anOSU to ECU because we were going back to something similar for GT. Makes me concerned that perhaps GT's defense is being underrated.
Man, that was my thought...who would look at their schedule and think "Better not not show my cards before matching up against that prolific Hokie offense"?
They finished 2013 with the 57th rated defense according to combined S&P+/FEI ratings.
I'm sure Bud will have a good scheme for this game. He always does. Now will the players be able to execute it good enough to hurt GT? That's the question. If the defense plays like it did against OSU then I think we'll be fine. If they tackle like they did against ECU then it'll be a long night. Same goes for the offense. Which one shows up? The offense against OSU and W&M then I don't know if GT's defense can stop them. The offense that showed up for the first qtr and half for ECU then things could get dicey.
With GT's QB seeming to be one of the smaller QB's they've had of late (5'11" 190 I believe) I would think CBF would force him to keep the ball most of the time. He may be fast as mentioned but he will take a lot of hits. Plus this is his first game against VT. I'd rather keep getting hits on the young smaller QB than on running backs who are used to getting hit and rotate out with other running backs to help keep them fresh.
Good analysis french however I would have liked to have seen something on their defense. I haven't watched any of their games this year but from the competition I would have expected the opposing side to score a lot less. The other teams have been able to keep all the games close. This appears to be one of GT's weaker defenses, again without watching and comparing though. I'm sure CSL is coming up with a good game plan to exploit them. Hopefully they don't "rise to the occasion" and play lights out in Blacksburg. I also hope this doesn't become a shootout with whomever has the ball last wins type of game.
If both O and D execute well I think we'll be fine. Especially since we've beat them the last two years with less than impressive offenses. Even if we do drop this game I still think we'll be in the run for the coastal because I don't think GT will run the table in the Coastal. I think they will actually be one of the bottom teams this year. However if we do drop it what does that say about us? We can and should win. All depends on which team of ours shows up tomorrow. I hate this game. Go Hokies!
I was just about to post a similar thought-we know Bud will have a good scheme based upon our personnel.
The question becomes with injuries, focus, etc, will the players execute?
I'd like to think that the ECU loss helped the focus/prep this week, but we'll find out.
There are no gimmes and we'll have to earn it.
I would wish for an offense that could sustain some drives and some 3-and-outs on D to minimize the wear and tear on the D.
I'd like to think that gatech has not been challanged by a defense like ours yet, but it remains to be seen.
I wanted to focus on the Yellow Jacket defense some, however two of their three games (and the only two we had film on) were FCS teams that ran spread veer option systems. With that offensive system and the "supposed" talent gap, it is hard to tell if the Yellow Jackets were playing a vanilla scheme or if their talent was way down. They certainly didn't dominate against Wofford or Georgia Southern, and their secondary had some major breakdowns against things as simple as a speed option to the boundary.
Ted Roof uses a 4-3 system with lots of blitzing, but I didn't see them getting much pass rush and they didn't dominate the line of scrimmage. Their secondary took some awful awful angles and was suspect in coverage, especially at safety. They couldn't stop Georgia Southern in the 2nd half. The Eagles are an excellent FCS team, but it didn't look like there was much of a difference in talent between the Eagles O and the Yellow Jackets D.
Georgia Southern just joined the Sun Belt. They're FBS now.
I always like the "hit the QB first" defense against the bees. The QB is much tougher for their offense to sub out. Make him pay for running and make him think about it and as French said he will get a little more quick to release and more likely to make a mistake.
who replaces Kyle Fuller's Ass Kicker position? requires someone fast with great tackling. With Facyson sidelined for the moment we probably need the our remaining Fuller at cb. Dinardo may not be fast enough. so Jarrett? or is this where RVD explodes?
the ass kicker position was a wrinkle added just last year right? it's possible we don't do that again this year as GiT may be prepared for it (just a one year deal)-- or we flat don't have the personnel. perhaps bud has something else up his sleeve.
Kyle played it some in 2012 and then was basically that position all game 2013 as I recall. definitely could have new wrinkle up Bud's sleeve but man did it work well. Basically devastated their run game. Even GT fans know it and are worried about who it's going to be.
I am not sure they use that approach. I'd bet that Paul Johnson expects to see the Bear look, hence the use of the belly play so much more last week. The weak spot in the Bear front is between the 3 technique and the stand up end. The Belly attacks at a wider angle to attack that natural bubble with the B-back, a pulling guard, and the quarterback.
Georgia Southern tried that strategy on several occasions and never could get penetration. It seemed like a combination of it not being Kyle Fuller and some good adjustments from Paul Johnson (ugh).
I think the only way to replicate that performance would be to get special permission to have one of our guys (Bonner?) actually line up on their side of the ball.
hmmmm, I wonder if we kept those jerseys they let us use a few years back
If I remember right, they didn't want them back after we beat them with the GT uniforms.
Man, this game is always one that scares me. Whichever team executes better is the one that wins. No doubt Bud will have a game plan, but it's up to our guys on the field to carry it out.
Is it just me, or does anyone else have a strong desire to see one of our guys just fly in and "intercept" one of those pitches? Just turn on the jets and run the other way before any of the GT players have any idea what's going on. I have wanted to see that for years.
I'm seeing a lot of concern from a lot of people for this game. I think we are going to lose, which sucks because of all the top recruits we are going to have at the game and because it will put us in a hole for even a Coastal division run.
Cheer up, dude. I'm now dialed in on a lucky t-shirt and underwear ensemble for the rest of the season. Nobody needs to worry about a thing.
Haha, nice. Ok, I'll make sure to blame it on you if anything goes awry! I'm just nervous as hell about this game, I was already worried about ECU and look how that turned out. When French is concerned, I get even more concerned.
I'm sad to report that I wore this site's Horse on a Treadmill shirt for the first time ever to the ECU game...won't be doing that again :/
I'm about to wear my HOAT shirt into Clemson's Littlejohn Coliseum for a needtobreathe concert. Tee hee.
I'm not worried about the tackle position. Even without Maddy/Marshall at 100%. Williams/Baron are fast and physical as well, and they've been playing nicely. I think Coach Wiles and Coach Foster trust them enough to split time 50/50 with M&M.
I've also seen enough of Chase Williams to believe that he's got the skills to impact this game ala Jack Tyler. The Hokie D is going to at least be able to mind the middle. I think this game will be won or lost on the edge. When the play gets spilled outside, Jarret and Bonner are going to have to be able to wrap up better than in the ECU game. And..as you touched on French, CPJ is going to test the corners with the jump ball after last week. Smeltzer looks like the real deal to me. He's going to be tough to cover.
Prediction - First one to 14 pts wins. The offense is going to HAVE to be explosive this week. GT secondary can be had. Watching the Ga Southern game, I saw Ga Southern WRs getting good separation all day. Hokies are going to need a few big pass plays if they want to open up the run game.
The only thing I fear is that this may be the first game where Hokie fans really, really miss Logan Thomas.
The bear look, with all the inside gaps covered, maximizes Williams strength (speed) while covering up his weakness (interior gap fits while taking on blocks.) if Bud uses the Bear, it will be very difficult for the GT guards to get out to Williams.
that looks like you are talking about Chase and not Nigel (both were mentioned in Leonard's post).
Reminds me of my wife's text during the ECU game: "We're losing badly and every ECU player is named Williams."
Pzactly.
Sort of off topic - Watching the BC-USC game. Many will think that FSU's biggest game is this weekend against Clemson. Better watch out for BC. Played them close last year, and Steve Addazio is NOT coaching scared.
You touted the GT run blocking scheme here...Personally, I'm in love with BC's O Line.
That's what you get when you take 5 biguns and coach them up for years.
They have great experience across the line.
I can't wait for that day.
On the 4th video... GT vs. UVA, watch GT's 17 go for the UVA defender's legs after the UVA defender is facing semi-away from him. Unnecessary.
I just noticed that. If anyone wants a short answer as to why we hate CPJ, that video is great. Away from the play, defender is looking away.
Notice too that the ref is looking right at it and doesn't call anything. I don't understand why the officials allow these cheap shots.
Also notice that those UVA uniforms might be uglier than any combination Tech has ever put together, no homerism.
I also noticed this (Thank you slow motion you are amazing. It really helps me see and understand whats going on) Once I watched the video again it appears that 17 is simply doing his assignment. If the QB keeps and follows 17 he has to make that block. It just so happened that the dive hand off occurred. At full speed its not really a cheap shot. What sucks is that when offensive players are potentially blocking for all three options at once and the defense can see where the actual ball is going and respond the outcome can be assigned blockers cutting down "out of the play" defenders. I hope VT can avoid injuries and come away from this mess with a W. Also foster is a genius at this scheme but UGA has beaten CPJ every year but one. What is their secret? Just superior talent in all phases?
I'm just having a hard time working up angst for this game. Unless GT has worked out all their kinks from their first two games, they just haven't looked as effective on offensive as previous years.
My biggest single worry is the damage their chop/cut ("it's all the same")blocking may do to our players, and particularly our D-line.
Am I the only one who wants that kind of blocking severely limited?
Changes I'd like to see to help minimize injuries from these blocks:
I can think of at least two other people who has mentioned it, named Beamer and Foster.
Something I've always wondered: do other teams view GT the same way? A difficult, physical, demanding, but ultimately winnable game? It seems like they don't fare well against really good teams with this offense, yet we're always caught in a dogfight with them. Is it just "one of those games", or is there something more? If the answer is just our offense hasn't been good enough to put them away early that wound be completely believable
The one constant you see -- teams that put GT in a hole quickly have a far easier time with them.
So yes, if we had any kind of consistent offense over the past several years, we would have handled them easily.
Hopefully this weekend Brewer has shaken all the cobwebs off, and we see Loeffler's offense make CPJ cry.
Exactly- if a team has some offensive firepower can get a stop or two and put some points up, they can simply just outscore GT (yeah, I know that sounds simple).
If you get up enough that forces them to pass, which they aren't terribly good at. If they keep running they won't have time to catch up. So they go 3 and out more often and that allows the other offense to score some more. That's how I see it. If they can't handle your offense and you have a reasonably good defense then you can put them away easily. If you put them away in the first half then it's pretty easy. If you allow them to stick around it gets tough. We have always traded punches with them and allowed them to stick around. Hopefully this offense is able to expoit what seems to be one of the weaker GT defenses and go up by a few scores early.
Thanks French. Is it just me or does their QB seem to get rid of the ball very quickly when they decide to pass?
Probably, by design and by necessity. The o-line isn't recruited to be great in pass protection, which is very different (so I understand) than run blocking, especially run blocking so focused on cuts/chops
Just like last week a big key for us is to keep the ball and keep the D off the field to rest. I'm hoping we see the running game make an appearance, mutatis mutandis, and be at least serviceable. I hope Klein isn't rusty since I'd imagine that Lefty is going to want to keep the 2 TE packages.
That was the most surprising thing to me in French's analysis: he seemed to say that our defense is partly predicated on allowing GT to run, run, run, and chew up the clock. Something like, the more times they run the option the more likely they are to make a mistake. If that's the case, I guess the depth of our defense will be a key factor, if we allow GT to keep the ball 40 minutes, but no Hokie has to play defense more than 20-25 minutes. Or maybe we see roughly equal time of possession, but each team only gets one 7:30 possession each quarter.
Also, 10 points for using "mutatis mutandis" in a sentence about football.
If we can make their strength their eventually reason for losing then that's a damn good plan.
Thanks, I got a word a day calendar for Christmas and that came up today. I was pretty amped to use it cause I'm a nerd.
Records and players aside GiT always plays us tough, going to be another 17-14 or 20-17 slugfest methinks
The closer we get to this game, the worse I feel about it. I know Marshall's playing and Maddy is "probable," but it worries me we might be pressing them into duty because of the situation, which makes me worry about them both enduring serious injury from cut blocking. Thomas is a shiftier runner and seems better suited to CPJ's offense, and their receivers look a hell of a lot like the ECU receivers who used size advantage to come down with every jump ball hurled their way.
On paper, this isn't a good matchup.
And my concern is due in large part to the fact that I have been conditioned to believe that our offense isn't going to pull its weight in the matchup. Which is frustrating, because in my head I'm a Lefty believer but in my heart we're still in the dark ages.
It's seems like every new QB that comes in is better suited for the option than the last one. But Bud always manages to crush there hopes and dreams. Hope that continues to be the trend.
And every new QB "brings a legit passing attack." that started after Nesbitt, and they never have had as good of a QB as Nesbitt. Maybe they shouldn't pass. Nesbitt was a great tailback, that's all they need. Hard to stop that midline with a guy like that.
I'm pretty sure when they beat us in 2009 they threw the ball TWICE... and if I'm not mistaken took up almost the entire third quarter with one drive. That game was painful to watch, made all the worse by us being #4 at the time. It was never Dwyer or any other B Back that killed us, it was always Nesbitt.
For someone that wasn't recruited for that system, I think he was the best QB there since CPJ was hired.
I looked it up -- they threw it seven times, but only one pass was complete. Bebe Thomas caught a 51-yard pass near the end of the first half. GT scored a few plays later to take the lead 7-3. We never caught up. Nesbitt rushed for 122 and Dwyer for 82; the rest of the team totaled 105.
This Game concerns me most considering how banged up VT is now. We have to score early take a lead and force them to throw. Otherwise this will be a long long Saturday!
When we have forced them to throw it was sack city as their OL looked clueless in pass protection. I don't think they could come back from a 14 pt second half deficit. I know we always focus on how the defense will handle their grade school offense, but if our offense can put up a lead it won't matter. the best defense against them is score enough points to force them out of the option offense.
It's amazing to see how incredibly different the offensive schemes the defense has had to face in this stretch of three games. Going from the spread to the triple option has to be difficult to adjust to, especially for a young defense. Hopefully they can execute.
I'll feel a lot more comfortable about this one if we jump out in front early, and if Maddy isn't forced to over exert his hurt knee.
Interesting that Miami's been 5-1 vs them too. What do they do schematically against git's O that have muzzled them up?
Attacking with their speed and power instead of reacting.
It almost seems like Miami wrote the book on defending the CPJ offense years ago: "don't let anything develop."
I remember seeing Miami destroy them early on in Johnson's reign at GT on a Thursday night. Miami made it look so easy. Just be athletic enough to not be blocked. They attacked on the edges with so much speed.
If you're not getting blocked, you will win. Duh.
I also recall Iowa beating them in a bowl game, and in that case it seemed like the big country boys on Iowa's DL just could. not. be. moved. Dominant DTs, gap fits, and maintaining your assignment responsibility seem to be critical in stopping GT.
Since they have a new QB again this year, it seems likely that he'll make a few mistakes (bad decision, bad pitch, bad throw), but CPJ knows this system so well, and his guys know how to execute it well enough, that he can just go in at halftime and say, "Hey you, right guard, change your block to this instead," and it opens it up all over again.
I think that was the 2010 Orange Bowl. After Iowa throttled GT, Bud visited Iowa the following summer.
My biggest fear - inexperience in our Defensive Front 7.
Of our Front 7, only Maddy has any extensive experience playing the Yellow Jackets and he's banged up already. The last couple of years we have been lucky because our front 7 knew Georgia Tech inside and out and it was very easy for Coach Foster to implement his game plan.
In my opinion, when you play unorthodox offenses experience is huge so you know what to expect and how to adjust since you have to play them differently. Unfortunately, most of our guys have very little to no experience playing the Yellow Jackets. And, while I love Dadi, he's biggest perceived weakness is staying home and playing assignment football and not biting on fakes, he has to do that this week or we'll be in trouble.
The offense has to come to play on Saturday and I believe put up at least 24 points for us to win. While I think our defense will play better as they game proceeds and they get used to the Georgia Tech offense (provided they still have their knees), I see us giving up a number of big plays.
We did NOT survive the 1000 cuts.
Little did I anticipate before that game that 800 of the cuts would be self-inflicted.