Beating Virginia: A Journey into the Mind of Steve Fairchild

Normally, my film previews are straight-forward high level overviews of Virginia Tech's next football opponent. I identify opponent's strengths, reveal challenging matchups, and suggest potential strategies on how the Hokies can take advantage of weaknesses. I don't make predictions, although I would be lying if I said that I didn't think the Hokies would beat UNC, and that I was stunned that they lost to Duke.

But, this is Hate Week, and this 2013 Commonwealth Cup has presented a unique case study of Virginia's offensive unit and maligned offensive coordinator Steve Fairchild. Fairchild's criticism of Virginia Tech's campus prompted a response from Hokies running back coordinator Shane Beamer. Perhaps Fairchild should devote more time and energy to studying his own personnel and tendencies. Unlike a competent coach, who understands how to morph a scheme to maximize the strengths of his players and hide their weaknesses, Fairchild seems insistent on leaning upon the short passing game to win football games.

If the record didn't scream it from the bell tower, the statistics drive home the point that Virginia's short passing game has been their biggest barrier to success. According to the Miami-UVa broadcast, the Hoos have forced 19 turnovers this season, but only have scored 12 points off them. Hoos quarterback David Watford has completed an average of 21 passes per game (19th nationally) but averages an abysmal 5.1 yards per attempt. Nine UVa receivers have caught more than ten passes, but only two average over 10 yards per catch. The system relies on a high level of execution and accuracy. Most throws are within 5-8 yards of the line of scrimmage, and there is a premium placed on accuracy and good decision making by the quarterback, minimizing drops, and getting yards after the catch.

If you turn on the film, you quickly learn that the Hoos personnel doesn't fit their system at all. David Watford is an incredibly athletic quarterback who has a cannon for an arm, but he struggles with accuracy and mechanics. He is indecisive not only throwing, but running, and then out of nowhere he will throw a pass that defies explanation. It is unfair to make him a high volume passer, because the more passes he attempts, the more those problems derail drives or result in turnovers.

Here are a couple of examples. First, Watford opens the Miami game with a quick screen to the right to a motioning Kevin Parks.


Watford isn't rushed in any way. He executes the fake, and his head movement should mirror Tracy Howard jumping into the throwing lane. There is no reason that Watford should throw this football, but he does anyway, and if you continue the film, he doesn't look particularly concerned about it.

As the game progressed, Miami got very little pressure on Watford, but even with a copious amount of time, he still struggled with accuracy. The following play typifies the fallacy of Fairchild leaning so heavily on the passing game. At this point, UVa is driving. Kevin Parks has rushed for well over 100 yards in the first half, but the Hoos trail as result of the opening play pick six. Fairchild calls a simple delay pattern for the tight end, who blocks as the boundary receivers run off the corners and then releases to the flat.


Watford has no pressure, but airmails the simple throw high and outside. Tight end Zach Swanson (6-6, 255 pound junior) compounds the problem by not making the tough catch and deflecting it high. Miami intercepts the pass and scores on the ensuing drive. Two offensive mistakes gave Miami 14 points, and the Hurricanes lead by 8 at the half of a game that the Hoos completely dominated.

The drops magnify the problems of Fairchild's offensive approach. The lack of big plays means that the Wahoos can't afford to make mistakes on first and second down. They need to catch those short five yard passes and move the ball on the ground to set up third-and-manageable situations. However, UVa drives are consistently short circuited by dropped passes. Senior Tim Smith serves as the primary Hoo deep threat, but after watching two games, he tends to have alligator arms when defenders are lurking around a potential completion.


Darius Jennings also had multiple drops against Miami, and usually dependable Jake McGee had a critical drop. Several drops occurred on third and less than five and would have resulted in a first down. Meanwhile, the Hoos averaged nearly five yards per carry leaning heavily on Kevin Parks, and the potential is there for Watford to make many more plays in the option game with his strength and athleticism.

So, Why Worry? The Specter Of The Terrapins

With all these problems, you would think that UVa, with a struggling quarterback, a coordinator who is bound and determined to throw the football despite those struggles, and lots of dropped passes would make a perfect recipe for an angry Hokie defense that hasn't played a terrific game since destroying the Pitt Panthers. Why does watching this film make me worry? I am nervous because I also watched the film of Maryland vs Virginia Tech.

For all their weaknesses, Virginia has every element in place to run the same kind of offense that gave the Hokies fits against the Terrapins. Maryland effectively used the option to limit blitzes by the Hokies. Their offensive line effectively tied up defenders rather than dominate them. C.J. Brown used his athleticism to make plays with his feet, especially against man coverage. Maryland got just enough big plays from young gifted receivers to punish the Hokies when they incorporated a spy early in the second half. And, the Hokies struggles covering punts against Boston College, Miami, and Maryland are well documented. Virginia has the ability to do all these things, if Steve Fairchild leans more heavily on his running game and the Hoo players decide to give a true effort on Saturday.

It all starts up front with a solid offensive line group. The UVa offensive line is much better than Maryland's, even with a freshman starting at right tackle. Bud Foster has normally generated terrific pass rush against UVa, but outside of Luther Maddy's three sacks against Miami, the Hokie defensive line has created very little pressure since the fourth quarter of the Duke game. The Hokies secondary thrives when the defensive front creates pressure and chaos, and Watford's struggles present a prime opportunity if the front can generate pressure. Against Miami, the UVa offensive line only allowed one sack or tackle for a loss (a sack and forced fumble for a touchdown on UVa backup quarterback Greyson Lambert late in the fourth quarter). Watford rarely received any pressure throughout the game and had several opportunities to get the edge on the option when the UVa offensive line completely crushed the edge, but he inexplicably gave Parks the ball anyway.

UVa has the potential to be a strong rushing offense. The line is huge, and all three Hoo backs are diminutive yet not afraid of contact. Kevin Parks excels at using his blockers to hide from the defense and then explode through seams. Despite his lack of size, he finishes his runs falling forward and is an effective short yardage runner. UVa's most effective running play is read option, and both Morgan Moses on the left and freshman Eric Smith on the right are very effective blocking down on the veer.

Here, Parks gets the ball on the inside veer.


The interior of the line gets great hat-on-hat push, and Parks sneaks into the hole and has time to juke back and forth to set up blocks. He is very patient, and his second stutter allows Morgan Moses, who has already driven the defensive tackle across the formation, time to come off his double team and slip to a second level defender. Parks bounces off that block for an extra couple of yards.

Watford has all the potential to be a terrific threat on the edge. Here, the UVa right side completely collapses the Hurricane defensive line, and Watford makes a terrific read to generate a big gain.


I am not sure why Watford doesn't run more often. Fairchild uses him regularly on the bootleg, and he sometimes scrambles for extra yardage, but he seems very indecisive for when to go. If I was Fairchild, I would set a goal to run the ball at least 40 times on Saturday, and use Watford on designed quarterback runs where the receivers run off the secondary deep. Will Fairchild have the patience to lean on the strength of the offense? I am sure the UVa fan base has their doubts.

If Fairchild needs to compliment the running game to keep Foster's defense off-balance, he can turn to Parks in the passing game. UVa loves to throw to their running backs off play-action, with both Parks and Taquan Mizzell scoring touchdowns against the U. Here, Parks shows how he can be used on third down to move the sticks.


This is a one-man route, with Watford looking to Parks the entire way. The UVa receivers run off the corners, and Parks floats to the flat. Fairchild trusts that Parks can beat the Miami linebacker one-on-one. Parks should be dead to rights on the play, but he breaks the tackle of the linebacker and then has a violent collision with the Miami safety just past the marker.

While the veteran Virginia receivers sometimes have alligator arms, 6-3, 200-pound freshman WR Keeon Johnson gives UVa a similar down the field threat to Amba Etta-Tawo. Johnson is a big body and has good speed. Here, he runs a deep curl route, a very effective route against the Hokies Inverted Cover 2 and Cover 3 defenses.


Johnson was being redshirted midway into the season, but UVa struggled so much with creating a down the field threat that Mike London inserted Johnson into the lineup. He has a bright future with UVa. If the Wahoos can establish play-action off the veer, Johnson gives UVa a threat downfield. Despite the occasional drop, senior tight end Jake McGee will be a tough matchup for the Hokies safeties and linebackers in the redzone. McGee as you recall caught the game winning touchdown in the waning seconds against Miami last season.

Finally, the poor punt coverage has been a major factor over the last three games for Virginia Tech. Neither Dominique Terrell or Tim Smith have been consistent this season, but Smith broke a long punt return against Miami to set up a Cavalier field goal. The Hokies must shore up the center of their kick coverage, and punter A.J. Hughes has to have an MVP-caliber day with his directional punting in order to support the defense if the Hokie offense struggles.

Keys to Victory

Bud Foster has developed a winning formula against UVa over the last nine seasons. His gap defense scheme had been tailor-made to stop the Cavaliers zone blocking one-back offense. Now, Steve Fairchild utilizes spread looks and option. Foster will counter with an inexperienced secondary decimated by injuries. For the Virginia Tech defense to squash any hope of a Wahoo victory, Bud Foster must find a way to limit the UVa running game and get pressure on David Watford. Over the last two seasons, Hokie victories were keyed by using stunts that forced UVa's quarterbacks to get rid of the football before they were prepared. Michael Rocco and Phillip Sims struggled against Hokie pressure, and without the aid of effective play-action, they could not punish the Hokie secondary in the drop-back game. James Gayle has always played his best games against the Wahoos. Matched up against a freshman right tackle, the Hokies need Gayle to have a dominant game after an inconsistent senior season.

To allow the Hokie defensive line time to pressure, the secondary and linebackers must limit UVa's ability to get chunk yardage on quick short throws to tight ends and running backs. Against Maryland, the Hokies played mostly man coverage. With a limited down the field threat I expect the Hokies to play a very shallow zone that allows the Hokie corners to look into the backfield and jump screens. Watford will give Virginia Tech chances to score points on defense, and those screens present a tasty opportunity for pick sixes.

Finally, the Hokies need a solid effort on special teams. The kickoff return team finally broke a long return against Maryland. Frank Beamer needs the punt return team to positively affect field position with the occasional nice return and fair catches when a return isn't possible. Finally, the gauntlet needs to be dropped on the punt and kickoff coverage teams. The defense is losing a bunch of starters after the bowl game. Coverage needs to be a de-facto tryout for the guys who want to step up and be contributors next season. If the Hokies get up early, I don't want to see seniors like J.R. Collins or Tariq Edwards on kick coverage. We need to see a young player step up.

This Commonwealth Cup is a critical tipping point for the Hokie program regardless of the struggles of the snobby neighbors to the North. UVa made inroads after last season, and the Hokies have to close out recruits at critical positions like defensive tackle, wide receiver, and linebacker. Many of those targets will be watching closely, and style counts almost as much as the score. If Virginia Tech wants to close out the Decade of Dominance in style, they need a dominant defensive effort this weekend.


I see the defense giving the hoos everything they can handle, but the offense absolutely must take care of the ball and keep Logan upright all game long.

It's all about The VPISU
VT '10, Born & Raised in the 804.
Rockin in The Bakken.
GO: Freeman Rebels, Keydets, Black Knights (the VMI of the North), NY Rangers & Giants, and ATL Braves.

For those asking about Greyson Lambert's impact... he moved the ball against Miami in garbage time, but the Miami D looked like they had checked out. He has a very good arm and is slightly more accurate than Watford, but he has poor pocket presence. His fumble (sacked and returned for a touchdown) was pure panic. He backed out of the pocket and put the ball out in front of him, making a great target for a strip. He also doesn't always do a great job of setting his feet to throw. If you have read previews comparing him to Matt Schaub (see Streaking the Lawn), well, they don't know their ass from their elbow. Schaub had good pocket presence and was incredibly accurate. Lambert may have a bigger arm, but he is more of a Druckenmiller (rock back and chuck it) than a Schaub.

To be honest with you, with the types of QB's that have given VT trouble, I'd go with Watford. However, if London knows that the rest of the offense won't play for Watford, perhaps you turn to Lambert to get more effort out of the rest of the bunch. He really hasn't done either. Saying both guys will play sounds more like a ploy to force Foster to devote practice time to prepare for Lambert, and then stick with Watford.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

Schaub had good pocket presence and was incredibly accurate.

Which is why Schaub is an NFL QB.

I've seen some Cavs swear that Lambert was a 5-star prospect! Probably a combination of ignorance, confusion with Phillip Sims, and overestimation of CML's recruiting prowess.

It's all about The VPISU
VT '10, Born & Raised in the 804.
Rockin in The Bakken.
GO: Freeman Rebels, Keydets, Black Knights (the VMI of the North), NY Rangers & Giants, and ATL Braves.

I (and most of Hokie Nation) agree that you don't play an inexperienced drop-back QB to jump-start your offense against the Hokies D. So London's announcement of Lambert seeing playing time is nothing but a smoke-and-mirrors game. Expect to see more running out of Watford, and Lambert only if LOLUVA is down by 24 pts or if Watford gets hurt.

UVA has never had a dynamic offense as long as I can remember, and has always wanted to run first and mix in a short passing game. This has rarely been enough to scare the VT defense, who have shut down the running game and dared LOLUVA to pass. I expect this year to be no different, despite the smoke and mirrors.

"When you're green, you're growing. When you're ripe, you rot." -Ray Kroc

Good article with a lot of info . IMO, UVA will give our Hokies all they want this game, because our Offense and QB play is not consistent . This game has a lot reasons to win, I hope we get it done ! Thank you for the article.

Jack R.

F**k LOLUVa. I get that we can't under estimated any team this year, which pisses me off, but I say we kick their a*s on Saturday cause I have faith. Of course, I've also been drinking rum all week in the islands so my perspective is pure!


I gotta admit...

French, I paid very little attention to your analysis. I was enjoying watching the UVA screwups.

No, I *don't* want to go to the SEC. Why do you ask?

We don't love dem Hoos.

My thoughts on Fairchild.

I quite like this guy... as a Wah!hoo. We expect them to be giant douchebags and he doesn't disappoint. This to me just tells me that VT will continue to dominate LOLUVA. The day they hire respectable, well meaning and honest coaches like a Beamer or a Cutcliffe type is the day I start to worry about LOLUVA gaining control in Virginia.

And since the Admin at LOLUVA are equals, if not greater douchebags than their employees I don't see this happening for quite some time.

I don't see LOLUVA running the ball for more then 75 yards in the game. Hopefully, the Hokies can get a 14 point lead early and force LOLUVA to throw the ball every down.

Touchdown Tech - Bill Roth

Logan just needs to take care of the ball and get rid of it when nothing is there instead of taking a sack. That's all he needs to do for us for us to win this game. We would have won the UMD game but instead the big momo held on to it like a baby to a mother's teet.

Change the last half of your last sentence into something less disrespectful and you'll find less negative votes.

Even though I disagree and know there were more factors than that, I won't downvote you. In fact I'll help you out. But move on from that bye game.

True Hokies STICK IT IN!!!

STICK IT IN Army of Virginia Tech


Fair enough. The negative votes are justified. I wasn't trying to be so negative, but the big man does need to get rid of the ball quicker. We took a lot of unnecessary sacks. This will play into the importance of this game with UVA else we may have the same outcome.

sorry I would rather have sacks than him forcing the ball and throwing interceptions.

No doubt but I mean for him to chuck it out of bounds or into the ground. Let's go rock some wahoos today!

I disagree completely, but agree with your right to say it (hence a few upvotes.)

This is the first game we lost this year when Logan didn't throw any interceptions. Taking a sack is no huge loss compared to throwing it away (except in FG range.)

I think the Pitt QB kept them in the game against VT by doing the same thing. Try to pull back and throw the ball away when you're pressured and weird turnovers tend to happen.

"When you're green, you're growing. When you're ripe, you rot." -Ray Kroc

Why does the analysis of the UVA offense make me think of a less consistent VT offense (hard to imagine)? Throw all the late season struggles out the window, tighten your chin strap and look for a boo hoo to hit. Today is all about effort and the seniors making sure they aren't the first senior class in 10 years to lose to UVA. #HateWeek