Comparing Fuente vs. 2013-2015 Beamer in Expected Wins

Spinning off of from KingJames post here I wanted to look at Fuente's performance against expected wins based on the Vegas Spread. By expected wins, I mean that a 14 pt favorite is expected win 85.1% of the time, a 7 pt favorite 70.3% of the time, and so on. Data sources and code are at the bottom, but betting line data was only available back to 2013 so I started from there.

Comparing the coaches overall:

Coach wins losses Expected Wins win_perc wins vs expectation
Beamer 2013 - 2015 19.0 16.0 21.21 0.54 -2.21
Fuente 2016-2019 32.0 17.0 31.17 0.65 0.83

Fuente actually exceeded Vegas expectations overall slightly in his first 4 years, but how does it look when we are favorites or dogs?

Comparing the coaches across types of games:

Coach spread_group wins losses Expected Wins win_perc wins vs expectation
Beamer 2013 - 2015 1. 14+ Favorites 4.0 2.0 5.72 0.67 -1.72
Beamer 2013 - 2015 2. 7-14 Favorites 5.0 2.0 5.43 0.71 -0.43
Beamer 2013 - 2015 3. 0.5-6.5 Favorites 5.0 8.0 7.84 0.38 -2.84
Beamer 2013 - 2015 5. 0.5-6.5 Dogs 2.0 0.0 0.68 1.0 1.32
Beamer 2013 - 2015 6. 7-14 Dogs 3.0 2.0 1.34 0.6 1.66
Beamer 2013 - 2015 7. 14+ Dogs 0.0 2.0 0.19 0.0 -0.19
Fuente 2016-2019 1. 14+ Favorites 13.0 3.0 15.4 0.81 -2.40
Fuente 2016-2019 2. 7-14 Favorites 4.0 0.0 2.94 1.0 1.06
Fuente 2016-2019 3. 0.5-6.5 Favorites 7.0 5.0 7.28 0.58 -0.28
Fuente 2016-2019 5. 0.5-6.5 Dogs 6.0 5.0 4.25 0.55 1.75
Fuente 2016-2019 6. 7-14 Dogs 1.0 3.0 1.1 0.25 -0.10
Fuente 2016-2019 7. 14+ Dogs 1.0 1.0 0.21 0.5 0.79

Fuente lost 3 games in his first 4 seasons as 14+ favorites, but has done as well or better than expected in other games.

For some reference points, here is UVA:

spread_group wins losses Expected Wins win_perc wins vs expectation
1. 14+ Favorites 11.0 1.0 11.46 0.92 -0.46000000000000085
2. 7-14 Favorites 4.0 2.0 4.42 0.67 -0.41999999999999993
3. 0.5-6.5 Favorites 7.0 5.0 7.38 0.58 -0.3799999999999999
5. 0.5-6.5 Dogs 8.0 15.0 9.17 0.35 -1.17
6. 7-14 Dogs 5.0 13.0 4.12 0.28 0.8799999999999999
7. 14+ Dogs 0.0 12.0 0.48 0.0 -0.48

Clemson:

spread_group wins losses Expected Wins win_perc wins vs expectation
1. 14+ Favorites 48.0 2.0 48.91 0.96 -0.9099999999999966
2. 7-14 Favorites 14.0 0.0 10.99 1.0 3.01
3. 0.5-6.5 Favorites 7.0 1.0 4.8 0.88 2.2
5. 0.5-6.5 Dogs 0.0 2.0 0.76 0.0 -0.76
7. 14+ Dogs 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7. 14+ Dogs 0.0 12.0 0.48 0.0 -0.48

Tennessee:

spread_group wins losses Expected Wins win_perc wins vs expectation
1. 14+ Favorites 21.0 2.0 22.18 0.91 -1.1799999999999997
2. 7-14 Favorites 8.0 2.0 7.63 0.8 0.3700000000000001
3. 0.5-6.5 Favorites 4.0 5.0 5.27 0.44 -1.2699999999999996
5. 0.5-6.5 Dogs 6.0 9.0 6.0 0.4 0.0
6. 7-14 Dogs 2.0 9.0 2.47 0.18 -0.4700000000000002
7. 14+ Dogs 1.0 14.0 0.72 0.07 0.28

Source: collegefootballdata.com
Code for those interested: https://github.com/hokiespider/win_probability

DISCLAIMER: Forum topics may not have been written or edited by The Key Play staff.

Comments

I did the best I could figure out formatting the tables but would love some help to make it better!

HokieSpider

Set table style to "blog_statistics"

Warning: this post occasionally contains strong language (which may be unsuitable for children), unusual humor (which may be unsuitable for adults), and advanced mathematics (which may be unsuitable for liberal-arts majors)..

Thank you for the insightful analysis. I formatted the tables for you.

<table class="blog_statistics">
...
</table>

You're welcome. I thought this analysis would give some useful insight into game/team preparation and in-game coaching. By incorporating expected win percentage based on the spread it should (theoretically at least) normalize for talent levels, home-field advantage, etc. and isolate on game planning and in-game performance.

HokieSpider

Would have been interesting to see Beamers whole career if the data was available

Free Hugh

I will try to find more data this weekend to make this happen (or at least go back further than 2013. I'll also bring in this season's games (my code broke pulling in 2020 because the API returned unplayed 2020 games with null betting lines - I'm a beginner with Python/programming and couldn't get it working last night.)

HokieSpider

One important statistic really jumps out at me. We got our butts kicked by LIBERTY. Very impressive data analysis, otherwise.

Yep and neither this year's Liberty Loss (17 pt favorites) or Wake (10.5 point favorites) are included so it will look worse when those are included.

HokieSpider

Great analysis! Also love the GitHub link!

Related stat from Chris Fallica:

I have no idea why my username is VT_Warthog.

Arkansas blew a 24-0 lead in the Belk Bowl.

VT is 1-9 in games in which the spread is within a FG either way, including six losses by double-digits...

To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
@VTnerf on insta, @BuryHokie on twitter, #ThanksFrank

2018 and early 2019 were really rough.

"That move was slicker than a peeled onion in a bowl of snot." -Mike Burnop

2020: "hold my beer"