
Well, it certainly wasn't pretty. As I feared, the Thundering Herd put a scare into the Hokies on Saturday. I don't think anyone was particularly satisfied with the performance, but the outcome leaves the Hokies at 3-1 as they begin ACC play against Georgia Tech on Thursday night.
Before I watched the film, I seriously considered not doing a review this week. The game featured almost every good and bad thing that you could possibly see in a football game, and the performance was so erratic, with so many highs and lows, that it was difficult to really evaluate everyone. BeamerBall produced two blocked kicks and a punter scramble for a first down. But special teams also missed several field goals, had a short punt that Marshall turned into points, and again was absolutely atrocious blocking on the kickoff return teams. An elite defense got gashed time and again, while also producing 8 tackles for a loss, four sacks, and forcing three critical turnovers. Kendall Fuller perhaps saves the game with a critical interception, but got eaten up on inside slant routes. Kyle Fuller blocked a punt and took away the short side of the field early, but was beaten twice on double moves, one overthrow, but one put Marshall close to field goal range to win the game. (Fortunately for Kyle, Rakeem Cato tried the same play to the wide side of the field, and while he fooled Brandon Facyson, he didn't fool Kyshoen Jarrett.) The offensive line tipped the spear to the tune of over 200 yards rushing, but then struggled on some key short yardage plays, only to turn around and clear the path for the game winning touchdown. Logan Thomas went from electric, to terrible, to lucky, to a powerhouse in just under 4 hours. Just typing that gives me a frightful headache. But, the Hokies got the W, and 48 hours later, with my blood pressure going back below stroke levels, I decided to drill down and sample a little of the good, bad, and the ugly.
How to Rush for 200 Yards and Evoke the Ire of the Fans
Without looking at the numbers, how many of you would have guessed that the Hokies rushed for over 200 yards on Saturday? The in-game eye test certainly would have not lead me to that conclusion. Instead, I focused on the near misses in the option game, and of course the struggles in short yardage now almost two full years after the legend of "Third-and-Logan" was born.
I am not going to sugar coat things here. There are two weaknesses in the Hokie blocking scheme that are preventing a huge rushing day. Most of the blocking at the point of attack, especially on the veer dive from the pistol, ranged from solid to outstanding against the Herd. Hokie offensive linemen pounded the Marshall front-four at the point of attack, leading to lots of chunk yardage running plays. Why have there not been more big plays? First and foremost, Virginia Tech occasionally struggled to cut off backside pursuit. That isn't surprising. Asking a guard or tackle to cross a defensive lineman's face who already has a big advantage based purely on alignment is the toughest block in football. Still, to effectively run this style offense, those blocks have to be executed. Far, far too often a hole developed at the point of attack only to have a defender come close the play down from the back side.
Second, the tight end play, specifically the blocking, is incredibly inconsistent right now. Last week the outside stretch play (and as result, the bootleg) was an afterthought, and this week again we saw very little stretch action and only one bootleg. On film, Kalvin Cline and Duan Perez-Means look terrific blocking on one play, and then the next play they are grasping at air. If Loeffler can't depend on the tight end position to seal the edge or veer release and block appropriately, it significantly limits his ability to run both the triple option and the stretch series.
Third, Logan Thomas is starting to keep the ball on read plays, but it still isn't as fluid and sharp as it should be at this stage of the season. Several wrong reads cost the Hokies huge gains, but, Loeffler's use of multiple versions of read option kept the defense guess, which created holes for other different players to make plays as the game wore on.
According to my very unofficial log, the Hokies featured mostly veer read option early in the game. The veer read option involves the offensive tackle and guard to the play side to double team the defensive tackle, with the offensive tackle peeling off to block the linebacker. The tight end steps away from his block in a veer release, leaving the defensive end unblocked (but trying to influence him to move outside and widen the hole.

The quarterback reads the unblocked man. If the end crashes, quarterback keeps. If the end stays wide, quarterback gives to the dive. The missing piece has been Logan Thomas establishing the keeper to keep defensive ends honest. Against Marshall, he took advantage.
00:07:42–00:07:49
The defensive end crashes hard on the dive. Thomas pulls out of the mesh point and follows Means for 10 yards. As the game went on, and Logan started to establish himself as a legitimate threat to read the end, it opened up the dive and other plays.
As the first half progressed, Loeffler started to call the veer less and less. Instead, he incorporated the same trap/wham action with a tight end or a fullback crossing the face of the formation. The line blocks the play the same as the veer, but when the defensive end looks for the dive, he gets trapped by the fullback or tight end coming from the blind side. The Hokies had varying degrees of success with the trap, but it produced the biggest run of the day by Trey Edmunds.
00:20:02–00:20:11
I am most impressive by Trey recognizing that the hole was wide and hitting it. I think early in the year Edmunds has been too likely to make the safe read inside, and he has left some big plays on the field.
Finally, the Hokies utilized the inverted veer made famous by the Logan Thomas game winner against Miami in 2011. Loeffler relied more and more on inverted veer as the game progressed, especially in short yardage situations. It was effective against Marshall, because unlike last season, Loeffler makes sure that it is a true read play. Chris Mangus had several effective carries sweeping outside from the inverted veer look, and as result, on those critical Logan Thomas runs in overtime, Marshall's linebackers had to respect the threat of Mangus on the edge rather than crashing the inside. Let's examine an early run by Mangus.
00:10:35–00:10:41
Here, Logan runs inverted veer from two backs, and this run is possibly a straight handoff all the way, as Logan does not fake the dive hard into the line. Mangus gets nice blocks on the edge, and finishes with a nice 9-yard run.
It wasn't always so pretty. Here, we have a poor read by Thomas on the inverted veer to Mangus, right after a big run by Trey Edmunds.
00:10:49–00:10:55
If you freeze right after the mesh point, look at the huge hole that the offensive line has opened up.

Mangus isn't helped by a poor effort by Duan Perez-Means on his seal block, but for the most part, Means, Cline, and Redman were better blocking than they had been in the last two games. There are still scary moments, but they are getting more comfortable.
After being brutalized on two critical short yardage downs in the late stages of the game, the offensive line started to control the line of scrimmage in the second overtime. While they controlled the interior gaps, the o-line did a better job, in part because the Marshall linebackers had to respect both dive and wide runs on veer and inverted veer. Here is Thomas on an inverted veer.
00:24:10–00:24:15
It is critical to notice how the linebackers focus on Mangus, even though almost everyone in the stadium knows that Logan is keeping the ball. All three interior linemen turn their assigned defenders to the outside, and Logan has an excellent running lane. On the final two runs, including the 2-point conversion, those same, much maligned players opened up giant gaps without the benefit of the fake. In the war of attrition, they ultimately won.
Following the game, there were complaints about Scot Loeffler "calling plays like Stinespring." Here is a breakdown of the running game (unofficial, based on my own count).
- 10 true veer options from the pistol formation
- 11 trap or wham options using the fullback or tight end pulling across the formation to trap a lineman or linebacker
- 10 inverted veer option runs
- 10 inside or outside zones (from I, single back, and pistol).
Not only is that almost perfectly balanced, but each was used appropriately to set up the other. The veer sets up the trap. The inverted veer stretches the defense out so Thomas can attack the interior. With a couple of notable exceptions (4th -and-1 from the shotgun... have mercy on my poor heart), the running attack was varied, worked as a system to establish multiple options on each play forcing the defense to defend the whole field, and generated numerous big plays. I don't recall many games last season where the offense rushed for over 200 yards and have 10 runs of over 8 yards.
It isn't perfect, and the Hokies left some big plays on the field. But, this is what the team is. They will have to grind for yards and put together long drives, and when you depend on college kids to execute over the course of a long drive, there will be breakdowns in execution to derail it sometimes. The Hokies just don't have the playmakers in the passing game to get the quick strike scores that would complement what is turning into a pretty good rushing attack. To go from pretty good to very good, there has to be better blocking on the backside of plays, and the pass blocking had some scary moments. But, this is a process, and given how poorly this group has been coached in the past coupled with inexperience, they performed pretty well except for a couple of real boners on Saturday.
Beating the Hokie Defense: Gap Fits, Attacking the Slots, and A Running Quarterback
As discussed in the preview, Marshall's game plan followed the "How to Beat the Hokies" blueprint. Rakeem Cato looked to get his best wide receivers open from the slot against the Virginia Tech safeties and Kendall Fuller, and then attack deep using a variety of four vertical concepts. The wet field gave Marshall a distinct advantage against man-to-man coverage. On a wet field, a wide receiver knows the route, but a defensive back has to react. When you factor in Cato's accuracy on those underneath patterns, the Hokie defensive backs performed admirably in very tough circumstances.
Here, Marshall runs a simple pass combination to the wide side of the field.
00:08:18–00:08:23
The split end runs a stutter and then go route deep, which freezes Facyson, and then requires any safety help to come over the top. That leaves Kendall Fuller on an island. Fuller has to play an inside-out technique to take away the slant. He plants at the identical time, but Shuler is quicker off the break and Cato is accurate with the football. Fuller does everything right, but the wet field, Cato's accuracy, and his trust in Shuler makes a terrific play look mundane.
Cato is one hell of a quarterback, and he played a magnificent game. Even though it is against his tendency, Cato ran just enough read option to deaden the pass rush and force the crash defensive end to stay at home. He hurt the Hokies with his legs as the defensive tackles and linebackers rushed too far up field, leaving Cato plenty of room as the Hokie defensive backs are running in man coverage. His accuracy was terrific, and until the Hokies started to manufacture pressure, it appeared he would have a career defining win in Blacksburg. More on that pressure in a moment.
We knew that Marshall would have some success throwing the football, but it was their running game that sparked them early. The Hokies appeared to have a great deal of trouble with traction early on, and often looked incredibly tentative in run defense. In the Bud Foster umbrella concept, if one defender gets pushed across his gap, it leaves a huge hole, and Marshall's small but incredibly fast tailbacks exploited those holes early.
Let's take a look at a long run from Marshall's first touchdown drive. Here, Marshall runs a zone play from the shotgun.
00:03:32–00:03:39
The Herd left tackle allows Dadi Nicolas to get up field, and then engages him to the outside. Woody Baron is double teamed, and Nigel Williams gets up field but doesn't move laterally to fill the gap. That leaves Tariq Edwards, in space and with a tackle bearing down on his blind side, to fill a gaping hole. Edwards tries to resist the down block from his back side, but loses traction and wipes out.

One slip, magnified by a small error in gap fits by the defensive tackle, and suddenly Kyshoen Jarrett is all alone with a tailback and several blockers headed in his direction. This happened several times to the Hokie front-seven, each time resulting in big gains. It is a high risk, high reward philosophy that the weather dampened on Saturday.
Fortunately for Bud Foster, Mr. J.R. Collins took over the game.
Collins stat line would be a fantasy footballers dream: 9 tackles, 1.5 tackles for a loss, 1.5 sacks, three quarterback hurries and a forced fumble. Most importantly, he raised his game when the Hokies needed stops.The fourth quarter was the J.R. Collins show. He started things off with a speed rush that forced Cato to throw an out to the wide side of the field, resulting in an easy interception for Kendall Fuller.
00:18:32–00:18:38
Hokies didn't go for it on fourth and inches, but Collins doesn't mind. On first down, he beats the left tackle with an outside feint into a hand slap rip move for a sack.
00:19:11–00:19:18
That was followed by a 3rd-down outside rip move that leaves the Marshall tackle stunned. The pressure forces Cato into another near interception. When the Hokies DESPERATELY needed a play when their backs were against the wall, J.R. Collins forced a fumble in overtime. Also, kudos to Derrick Hopkins, Luther Maddy, and Kyshoen Jarrett for making big plays down the stretch. Hopefully Jarrett did not aggravate his hamstring injury on the game saving interception at the end of the fourth quarter. It wasn't pretty, but the defense made the plays they had to make to win the game.
This week, Paul Johnson's flexbone squares off against Bud Foster's defense. The Bees have an improved passing attack and new wrinkles that will be previewed on Wednesday's special on the Rambling Wreck. Foster has four days to make adjustments to the option scheme, which limits his ability to blitz and puts tremendous pressure on the secondary players ability to tackle one-on-one in space. Foster always adds some new wrinkles for Johnson's offense. This should be one hell of a chess match on Thursday.

Comments
Alright, we've gotten our mistakes and sloppy games out of the way (is that so much to ask for?), bring on the ACC!
WOW. Just wow. French you are good.
Well done French. No doubt this line provided really good pass protection all day and netted over 200 yards rushing. Big improvement over what we saw last year.
We still need to be more consistent as an entire offensive unit. Hopefully the unit will come together as the competition gets tougher. No doubt, effort was noticeable every where.
Who did you upset to get negative turkey legs? I feel like I would likely enjoy that post.
The entire board when the O-Line was announced....stated the best O Lineman was on the bench.... Stated that Benedict should play tackle ahead of either McG or Gibson.....went to -25 real quick......I asked to please reset me to -24, and the head webmaster did.....I have been real careful with my posts as to not offend anyone....sorry if I did!
Welcome back!
Seriously, who is doing the down voting? What could POSSIBLY be offensive about this? It's not like he's Cody Journell (too soon?)
I recall that thread. The overall sentiment from the others here was that if Benedict were the better lineman, he would have been starting at that time. Grimes determined that he was not better than Gibson, no matter how much game experience Benedict had.
A few weeks later, Benedict has outplayed Gibson and has won the job. Not due to prior experience, just due to outperforming him in practice.
Sometimes things can change over a couple of weeks.
While Wang has played better than I thought he would, I'd prefer to see Miller move to center, Benedict at right guard, and Gibson at right tackle. Nothing I have seen on film suggests otherwise.
Kinda lends credence to the idea that Loeffler and Grimes were treating the first four weeks as an extended camp, huh?
I'm pretty sure we'll see more moves, including Miller snapping the ball again.
I would be surprised. When Wang got hurt on the first TD drive, Arkema came in at left guard and Farris moved to center.
Not gonna lie, I was a little sad to see Arkema come into the game. He's not won me over.
He was in two plays, in goal line/short yardage, and they scored a touchdown. He blocked effectively on both plays. I can't complain.
Another excellent piece of work, French. I continue to wonder why we haven't seen any designed misdirection runs from Loeffler. On the face of it, one would think that would be a really good way to take some of the starch out of the backside pursuit that's been giving us trouble in the running game.
My hope is that maybe Loeffler has been sandbagging those plays and that we'll see them against GT.
So, there have not been counters per say, but the variance between trapping the end vs leaving him unblocked has the same effect of freezing the defense because the linebackers are watching the mesh point and the end is wondering if he is going to get blindsided.
I would like to see a little bit more counter action and bootleg and based on Logan's comments more variety is coming. I am not sure, but I think the long Edmunds run was a play designed to look like the read option but actually was a counter because the OL reach blocked to the left rather than down block to the left. Again, the genius may be in the subtlety.
One other thing we have not seen is true triple option off the veer. They ran a little with Coles and Byrn against Bama, and we have not seen a pitchman running with Logan since then. I am willing to bet, first time you see Edmunds lined up in an offset pistol and Mangus is in the slot, Mangus will run pitch relation to Logan and will get a pitch for a big run. Perhaps even this Thursday. Sticky this, and if I am right, everyone has to send me a London Broil.
I've been thinking this same thing when I've been discussing Hokie football with both Hokie fans and fans of other schools that don't think very highly of us. We've seen 4 games and pretty much 4 different offensive gameplans. Who knows what we will see for the ACC schedule, but at the same time, defensive coordinators probably feel the same. Will we pull the triple option out or will we run several bootlegs? Shotgun, pistol, I, or under center? Who knows what we will do, but I love it! It sounds strange to say but the lack of knowledge of our scheme means that we have a slight advantage as long as we keep it simple and execute.
To me, the gameplan has been identical for 3 of the 4 games. There have been varying degrees of complexity, but it is pretty clear what they want to do.
I guess what I mean is that we've seen some twists that will show up in one game and not often or even at all in the others. The triple option is one of them and the bootleg is another.
It is much more difficult to run a naked bootleg against a 3-4, and Marshall's DE's were not reading anything. Both scenarios make it a challenge to run boot.
The triple option will be there this week. Watch for Mangus to get a big gain on a pitch.
And this is why I come to this site. These are things I don't understand so thanks for the clarification French. I just thought we showed it and then held onto it because we didn't want to show it again, not that it would have been ineffective against the other team's D. What a novel idea to consider what's happening on the opposite side of the ball in order to plan what you will do...
Win the game?
Move the ball into field goal range consistently?
So great. Reviews like these make Monday and Tuesday mornings bearable.
But the last two videos aren't showing up for me; anyone else having this problem?
Yea, same problem here.
Great article as always. I love how you call out "armchair" Coaches too and then blow them out of the water with stats and facts!
What I dont understand is how come we arent running more out of the I-Formation, even Single Back look? We are running an incredible amount out of the shotgun and pistol formations....
I understand what he is doing with all the veer options, traps, etc, but when you are in a 3rd or 4th and <1 yard to go, WHY are we back in shotgun? Thats what has upset me the most about the offense this year.
ESPECIALLY since the few times we did run out of singleback, it kinda worked.
This! I am no pro but I don't understand why we aren't running more out of the I-formation or other power running formations. This was our identity on offense. I still believe we are trying to blend too many things instead of having a true identity on offense. In my opinion, the single back counters have always been big for us and running out of the I with a fullback (especially with Sam Drago Rogers) to lead block. Our O-line is having trouble consistently blocking well enough to allow the RB get to the line of scrimmage without having to break a tackle or dodge a defender.
I'm really hoping we are saving that wrinkle for acc play or where the competition lends itself to that. But I have a feeling this offense isn't capable of that. The O-line is better but not good enough to consistently give LT the time to do a 5-7 step drop back, scan and throw. I could be wrong, and I hope I am...but that is how I see it.
Im mainly referring to running the ball in short yardage or really any yardage (but mainly short yardage) situations. I just feel the its better to have a leading fullback as oppossed to essentially a RB or QB draw from 4-5 yards behind the line of scrimmage to pick up that short yardage... Thats what I dont understand.
I DO hope we have some extra "wrinkles" we havent shown yet.... Lets all hope..
Spot on as always. Question for French - any idea why Marshall didn't seem to try the stutter/double move on the deep ball earlier in the game? It was obvious from the start that the corners were jumping the out routes. Was the safety help over the top enough to deter it?
I think they avoided it early because they didn't feel like they could protect Cato. They tried it 3 times late, and all 3 times the corner was burned. But, I am guessing that some of those sacks came on similar attempts at stretching the field.
I am a huge Kyle Fuller fan, but I have been nervous about him at the boundary. The position requires him to be an excellent tackler (which he is) but also someone who has closing speed when he gets caught because often there is no help for him deep. Kyle has been beaten a few too many times on double moves (Cincy, FSU in 2010, Arkansas State in 2011, Pitt) for me to be as comfortable as I'd like. At field, he played much more deep third and half coverage that allowed him to watch the QB and provide run support.
This week, he may be a whip. Hats off to the kid.
Awesome job, French.....
We are very fortunate to have someone with your knowledge on this site. You help to educate the rest of us..... Thanks again, Sir....
I've been really impressed the past 2 weeks with the defense closing out games on the final few drives. Last year they would play great for 55 minutes and seem to get beat on the big play at the end (ala FSU and Cinci). This year, they almost rise to the occasion and take over at the end with ramped up pressure, forced turn overs, and scoring (or almost scoring - nice effort Skip). Great work by Bud and the seniors to just get it done.
Also, I originally discounted his potential contribution based on his size but Mangus is a playmaker. He's small but tough and just make big plays in both the run and passing game. I hope he continues to get as many looks with JC back in the mix - the wheel routes out of the backfield seem to have a lot of potential and Mangus look really smooth catching and running.
A) As always, French brings whole piles of titties with this and every review. Stellar job as always, sir.
B) "...except for a couple of real boners on Saturday." Best line of the write up! It's just primed for a Wang joke that I won't make.
C) Still, I'm more hopeful for GT now than I was just before reading this article.
D) Stiney's suckitude is rearing its ugly head yet again with TEs that can't block and ruin the offense makes me not surprised in the least. He needs to be recruiting coordinator only. Leave it to Grimey to teach the TEs what's good.
French, why you aren't on a sideline somewhere eludes me.
I get the feeling that the 4th & 1 from the shotgun didn't sit well with you, either? What would you have called? I'm doing a QB sneak off of Miller's butt, but that's just me.
I for one was actually pretty happy with that call. You go under center there and every single person in that stadium knows what's coming: some sort of inside run. They put 9 guys between the tackles, and the result is almost certainly a loss or no gain. While it didn't exactly work here, I really liked the idea of spreading out the defense, keeping them from stacking the box, and then running a veer/option type play for the first, which, by the way, is exactly what we did in 3OT for the win. Just sayin'.
My call is to put LT under center, draw the D into the "obvious" play, then pitch out to Mangus. Odds are he goes in for a TD, and if nothing else, easily picks up the first down.
That would probably be ideal, actually. Similar to the fake FB dive, HB pitch that was worked so well for me in NCAA. Of course, I've also been a huge fan of the fake QB sneak to kit Cline in the seam.
I screamed blood murder, and while Andy bitter pointed out that they were stopped on a 4th and 1 sneak last week, it was more like a 4th and 2.
At the same time, I was more upset when Miller got completely blown up on the 1st and goal on the final touchdown drive. I am lucky that I didn't get kicked out of my condo. Most important part about blocking on the goal line is snap count. Your OL must get off on the ball, and the QB must vary his tone and cadence. The OL struggles, but part of that is on Logan. He is incredibly rhythmic and monotone in his snap count and I think that helps DL anticipate the snap on short yardage.
Let's just say, when he adds a high pitch squeak as part of his count, I bet the whole damn DL will jump offsides.
But seriously, Hokies please sharpen up your game and limit your mistakes in ACC play.
I think French touches on a very important point. Balance and playing calling schemes.
When you have the Defense respecting all aspects of the game, everything opens up. All of a sudden the O-line looks great, backs are getting running room, and receivers are open.
We saw a glimpse of that Saturday. Loeffler appears on track to put the Offense in a better position to be successful.
This. Edmunds up the middle doesn't seem to be working initially, especially when Marshall puts 8 in between the tackles; but it opens up Thomas on the veer outside, which then opens up Edmunds up the middle. This is logical play calling, and I like it.
Also, can we have more of Mangus, please? Dude is lightning.
Great job French!
Look forward to discussing the game plan and matchups against GT.
French - great read. Two questions for you that were bothering me big time after Saturday. Does the endless motion pre-snap on almost every single play really create any sort of advantage for the Hokies?
And why the insistence here on two straight games to continue to feed Trey up the middle when that play just hasn't been working?
I think it more depends on the play. In passing situations its used to create mismatches with putting linebackers in coverage. Think Mangus or JC moving into the slot. Theyre are going to be a lot quicker than most linebackers. I think that's the gist of all the motion for passing plays. Running plays it can move defenders from the box because they must respect the passing play.
The motion is usually just to allow Logan to make a pre snap site adjustment and determine if they are running man coverage. I am not a huge fan of a ton of motion (I think that the Hokies have gotten away with several motion penalties on the veer) but it does create some confusion.
The former OL in me hates it, just because it is harder to fire off in your stance when you have been down for 20 seconds.
I was pleasantly surprised by the # of read & veer options we ran during the course of the game. Watching live it didn't seem like we ran option that often, but part of that was probably the extra plays in OT that adding to the tally.
Really happy to see veer & inverted veer mixed up in the same game.
What is French's background and why aren't you coaching (unless of course you are...). I love your game tape analyses. Each week they make me a better fan and student of the game.
French's background is like Sam Roger's and Superman's, a mystery. The only faults I've found with him is liking the Rangers and calling pie the best dessert.
edit: 'cause see below...
how can a "sweet treat" be the best "dry expanse"?
desert vs dessert
Good call and thanks for the grammar check.
BOOM!!!
here are 2 whole entire turkey legs for you...take 'em and run
Whoa there cowboy! Don't go messing with the supremacy of pie over all other desserts. French knows what he is talking about in football and desserts. Besides, do you really want to open that can of filling again?
Pie > Cake
Always, eternally and forever. Cake is for kids, birthday parties, and little old ladies at the church pot luck dinner. Pie a la mode is the greatest dessert ever invented.
French, I gotta figure a way to get you one of my wife's pies. They're amazing. Until then, have another turkey leg.
Oh, I've opened it. Truthfully though, I'll take a solid baked good (cookie, brownie, blondie, etc) over cake OR pie.
He also doesn't like cheese. There's something strange about a person that doesn't like cheese...
I gave a leg to French for pie. I want it back for dislike of cheese...
Cheese is the worst.
Especially when you're allergic to dairy products like I am. Took a long time to get that waived before I went into the ARNG
I played D3 football in the late 90's for a wonderful OL coach. I have a very different career these days, but I do this because it helps me decompress from watching the games and I hated seeing fans bashing kids for things beyond their control.
I am critical of players in my column, but only if I see poor technique or effort. This year both have been excellent for the most part on the OL. Sometimes, the defender is just better (see the nose tackle from ECU.)
It is hard to know when a player is lacking effort and when a player is confused and misses their assignment, which may look like they are putting in poor effort. I believe this team does not have players that lack effort.......I am very impressed with their effort across the board. Beamer has something to do with that. I am going to say it....this is a well coached team. We will see proof of that as the year rolls on.
I know I'm jumping ahead here...but, in your astute opinion, can these Hokies sustain drives long enough to defeat the bad guys from Atlanta next week? It seems that the formula to win against CPJ is get up by 10 pts, and then keep them off the field.
Too many 3 and outs against Non-ACC competition has me concerned. I worry that GT will get a TD lead and nurse the hell out of it. Nobody can hold on to a lead like CPJ.
The nice thing is, Georgia Tech faces the same problem. When you need 10-12 play drives to score, something is bound to break down (see Yellow Jacket fumbles.) The flexbone is a big play offense, but Bud Foster has done a magnificent job at making GT take 3-5 yards rather than popping big plays.
The biggest problem with VT is the wide receiver group. If they had a legitimate deep threat, everything about this offense would look 100 times better right now. Stanford is a decent possession guy. Coles... well he is a big body but you can tell he just isn't confident cutting and as result his route running isn't great. Basically, he has to shield the defender with his body or be wide open. Knowles regressed against Marshall. Byrn almost cost them the game with an awful route on the game winning touchdown.
A deep threat would make play action 100 times more dangerous and it would open up the running game. Right now, defenses are only needing to defend the 15 yards closest to the line of scrimmage, and that really hampers the run game.
I know folks are frustrated with Logan, but even though there are still those "oh no" decisions, every other facet of his passing game has improved. He was looking off receivers. His accuracy has been better (not great, better). He is making progressions and not locking on as often. He just doesn't have the guys getting open down the field. Stanford is the best at it, and ultimately he will be the number 1 receiver this season.
Call me stubborn, but the offense left me rather underwhelmed. There were times Marshall DL seem to blow up the offensive line and stop the running game cold. When Logan needed to pass, he seem to stare down his intended receiver and fire off a pass. Same old issue, I guess.
I do realize that Marshall's DL was coached by a former Hokie's defensive lineman who was coached by Foster, I believe, so it does make sense that the DL would be making Thomas mighty uncomfortable. Yet, I hesitate to say that the offense will start clicking on Thursday against Roof's defense, which seem to be more than happy to blitz, mainly because of the trouble the offense had moving the football at will against ECU and Marshall.
I do realize that ECU's and Marshall's defenses don't get enough credit except here on the site, but I think that the game against Georgia Tech is going to be a war. Whenever those two teams play, it's like a slugfest to see who fold first, and then whoever folds, lose.
Other good signs:
Trey Edmunds is averaging 4.5 yards per carry and on 78 carries he has only had 9 yards worth of negative plays.
Chris Mangus is much more productive than I thought he would be this season. He has become very dangerous out of the backfield.
Five receivers have 7 catches or more. That makes it difficult for a defense to key on one guy.
And we get JCC back....more speed. I like.