Recent Comments

Some might bump up, but I think at least half won't.

UVa, Pitt, BC, Cal, Stanford, Wake, GT, Syracuse, and Duke likely don't want to football hard enough. Not sure about NC State and Carolina is stuck in Belichick hell.

FSU, SMU, and Clemson will stay near the top in funding (although Clemson may be hobbled by Dabo's buyout). We just want to be breathing the same air they are. Miami will want to play ball, but unclear if their smaller alumni base is up for it. I imagine Louisville plays keep up with us.

That pretty much leaves us in the top 4-6.

As an aside, I was listening to an FSU game on the radio while driving a couple weeks ago. They have corporate sponsors for first down and the red zone. Whenever the announcers say those terms, they mention the sponsors.

This is exactly why I've found it so discouraging that we haven't gone forward with the project. It's malpractice to not install them. It's a microcosm of the mismanagement happening in the athletic department. If they can't even do the slam dunk projects, how could they possibly handle the complex and challenging ones?

I would argue Edmunds day was more instrumental in terms of changing the result of the game. Minnesota won 48-10. Rodgers had a great stat line, first to ever do it in a game but it was more icing on the cake in a blowout. Bungles were terrible. They didn't even manage 200 yards of offense.

Edmunds took two scoring opportunities away in the 4th quarter, one in the end zone and the other in FG range while the Bears offense went off the rails and didn't score in the 4th.

After listening to the announcer at the start of the Wofford game talk about the path for us to make the Playoffs, I am all in - ACC Championship baby! We going 0-8!!!

Pages