Recent Comments

There are already court precedents now stating it was because NCAA and member schools don't have anti-trust exception. Won't take much to lump this one in because defendants can be proven to have earned compensation off his efforts.

Depending on length of service in their sport, they continue to be a member of the players association. As such if their likeness is used they receive compensation. Alumni also can reach agreements outside of the players association for being included in things like sports cards and other memorabilia. Not sure how the use of their image by their sports are handled after career but the major difference is that the professional leagues have anti-trust exceptions. The NCAA and it's member schools do not. That is the biggest reason given by the judges that continue to find for the players in these court cases.

Didn't the NCAA require players to sign over their likeness as a condition to participating in NCAA sponsored sports?

You can claim they got ripped off or signing over your likeness as condition of playing is overreach, but they did have to sign something. Maybe that was just EA sports with the video games before it got cancelled, but I thought that was the NCAA as a whole.

Can honestly say this is the first year where I didn't even do a bracket and didn't watch a single second of March Madness

Welp...went completely backwards. FSU moved up a spot despite losing to UVA.

Hokies dropped a spot despite going 4-0. Didn't move ahead of South Carolina who dropped to 11th after losing and they moved Arkansas ahead of both Hokies and South Carolina for beating #2 Florida twice.

Five of the eleven teams ahead of Hokies lost this week, including Arkansas.

I disagree with your comparison to minimum wage. In this case, the NCAA, Villanova and other entities have continued to use his image, performance, etc to profit/advertise off of. Your discount store is not using your likeness in advertising etc unless you posed for commercials etc.

At no point did he sign over the use of his likeness and in most of these cases it has been proven that there were no clauses included in scholarship documentation turning over those rights.

I don't like the re-ringing the bell but this seems a clear case that NIL is a legit impact versus pay for play. If his performance wasn't a big deal, why have they continued to use it?

Interesting...they showed a Tweet at Halftime from this guy talking about Jay Wrights suit and my immediate reaction was...."Who..???"

Maybe making a big shot in a basketball game once that only a very small fraction of the population even remembers doesn't entitle you to a lifetime of millions?

Maybe NIL a largely a farce used by guys who things didn't turn out for and didn't get to live out their NBA/NFL dreams?

If this goes through (and it probably will)...there is a legit possibility that many Athletic Programs will have to close shop....

For instance..if he wanted to...how much in NIL Reparations could Mike Vick demand from VT??? We'd be completely cleaned out.

We have cruised several times, and have not had a lot of issues with germ generated sickness, but it does happen. Being on a ship with lots of little kids or partying young people tends to make that a little riskier, though Disney seems to do a good job of germ control. Do pack some Imodium, as if you seek care for anything illness related you will be asked to quarantine in your room until symptoms clear. My wife gets seasick, but only had an issue once, when a large storm hit us in the Caribbean thirty some years ago. The newer ships are more stable and the cruise lines do a better job of routing around the storms now, so the only time she takes dramamine now is if we take a snorkeling tour or some other tour involving a smaller boat, though she does make sure to face forward where there is fresh air on the tenders if we are not docked, just to be safe.

Totally with you. All of this retroactive BS should lose in court. It's not like he was owed anything and it was withheld. The rules were different. When the minimum wage was raised from $3.40 an hour (yeah, I'm going back a long way), I did not get retroactive pay from my job at the discount department store for the prior years before the minimum wage was raised to whatever it was raised to. These cases should all be tossed. They won't be, but they should lose. Whether they will or not is a different story, but the should be tossed and/or lose.

Yes, these types of cases are a bit silly but as someone who lived within walking distance to Nova's campus for a few years, this guy absolutely has one of the better "they actually used my name image likeness excessively" arguments. Buildings plastered his shot everywhere and there were literal murals made of that moment. Not saying it's good enough to warrant any money but as Verne would say.... "Better than most"

Yes, sarcastically I am down playing it. In all honesty, I don't care if the guy gets paid or not. I'm curious about his "but-for" allegation and how much he lost in potential earnings at the time he was enrolled at Villanova. Maybe he should also sue Villanova for a share of the $22.6 million donation it received the year after his shot. Arguably, without the gaming winning shot Villanova doesn't receive that donation.

Pages