Recent Comments

Join The Key Player's Club to read comments posted in exclusive content and its members only forum.
I agree that the numbers out are skewed by the scholarship/walk-on change. Every school had to drop the bottom 10 of their roster or so.
We kicked Orange Hunts ass, but I'm not gonna mention what my swim teams mascot was

It's as plausible an explanation as anything else.
That was hilarious. They were as consistent as can be.
I am loving the "Lets go" in his retweet. Or perhaps I am just reading too much into that.
There is a lot of money in Phoenix and ASU football is the only game in town in terms of college. It's easier to get NIL money committed when you win the Big 12 and make the playoffs. It's an easier sell. Unlike Blacksburg, every major business is located in some way shape or form in the valley. Major restaurant parent companies, major banks, major golf companies, major tourist companies. When you win, you can tap those resources. Arizona ran up the score on ASU a coupe years back and were mocking them on the field. Now the tide has turned.
When you frame it that way:

Right, and many guys were also the first in their families to have access to a VT degree, and would not have gotten into the school if not for football. It was the opportunity of a lifetime all things considered and something people take on crimpling debt to do and go to community colleges to gain admission later etc. There is a wait list to get into VT for regular students. That opportunity of a lifetime for many wasn't enough for ballers though.
This is a completely valid and defensible take. It is also free of hyperbole or snark, which makes it easier to process and agree with, and less likely to be misunderstood.
I appreciate this post, DC.
"Okay, but how many players do you think realistically would make more from NIL than an NFL salary?" in any normal world/business/any other line of work, of course fucking not- answer should be zero. But there are Vandy alumns that view 7 wins as more important than their children and faith, so they pay Pavia- allegedly- more than the Tennesee Titans would pay him- which is a figure close to zero. That is what's fucked up. The market value for amateur football players is higher than professional football players in some cases. Where else in the world do you see that? where do interns get paid more than seasoned pros? where do junior developers get paid more than the CIO? nowhere. But in this world, things are so fucked up that the huge injustice- pay for play- has now gone full circle... you have kids like Arch Manning making more than he would on a rookie NFL deal. The only reason Bronny James left is because his dad got him a contract from the make a wish foundation that he would not have gotten close to from any other NBA team. This bullshit going unchecked will kill college sports.
I guess their pay to play ratio is pretty accurate and they don't hate their coaches.
That qualifies as success in the college football world.
Seems to me you can get a lot of passive goodness out of this, without raising any animosity at all. You can even look surprised if he even brings it up when you're wearing your VT gear. Even better if you get some NIL merch of one of these players.
Okay, but how many players do you think realistically would make more from NIL than an NFL salary? Mind you, I was only talking about guys who think they have a legit shot at the NFL. Otherwise, I agree, take as much money as you can from NIL. But if someone is dumb enough to chase NIL money and potentially sacrifice a shot at an NFL salary (like taking NIL to sit on the bench at a school with deep pockets like Texas where you get zero playing time, so a team wouldn't draft you), that's an IQ test that someone failed.
Neil Brown- fired last month- beat VT twice. Neil fucking Brown. That's where we are.
LOL I went back and looked at the comments and it was all a meltdown in the game thread from the WVU game a couple years ago.
1. Lower the age to enter any sports league to 13. If you are Mr. travel baseball and want money, sign with a pro team at age 13. If you are Maurice Clarett and just too good for college, enter the NFL draft at age 13. This throws the whole slavery/unpaid/uncompensated labor bullshit premise out the window. If Gunner Givens or Linn Kidd want money- turn pro after their 13th birthday. 2. If you transfer schools with your coach NOT leaving you must sit a year. Do those 2 things, and most of this gets fixed. VT can perhaps compete again in major sports and actually graduate some players and the Jay Bilas's of the world can't cry fairness when the whole Duke hoops team could just get their money from the NBA.
See here is my thing. I'm not dogging any of these kids personally - I'm not dogging all of the FCS. That QB for Montana State could play for us for example. People are missing my overall point- which is the fact that VT has been mediocre to bad for a dozen years now. Not one year, not an anomaly. IF you want to elevate from that and not spin wheels, at SOME point in the programs evolution you have to recruit better than mid 40s and you MUST not assume every kid from Mercer will be Bayshul Tuten. that keeps you at 6-7 forever. Plugging holes with lower division guys keeps you treading water. For every Tuten, there are 5 guys that don't ever contribute. So where are we elevating? HS recruiting? not yet- we are recruiting like a 6-7 program- a 4 star here and there. Nothing spectacular. If you sign D2 guys in the portal, lighting is not going to strike to the point you are competing with Clemson. My whole premise is actually raising the talent on the team and not treading water.
My personal favorite of the NIL era is the lawsuit against the FSU BB coach from 6 former players saying they have emails and texts from him promising them NIL money (around 250k each) that they never got. So they are SUING him for the money. Not the NIL group, not the school, they are suing the coach.
VMI is one of the worst football programs in all of the FCS. And it sounds like Stone had some attitude issues.
I get your overall point about the levels of college football. That said, if the staff thinks they can get a better eval, and a higher floor but lower ceiling by taking a guy that has at least proven to be productive at the college level as opposed to a guy who was at a P4 program but never saw the field, I'm okay with that. That gives us a better chance to win now, which will allow us to elevate our HS recruiting going forward. If we take nothing but unproven P4 retreads, this staff could flame out and we could be starting over yet again.
One of my new directors is a Mountaineer. Gonna need some more goodness out of this whole OL situation so I can shove it down his throat
The lack of WVU in the top 20 completely invalidates this entire list.

WVU, as many have suggested, should be near the top.
And Penn State is not near enough to the top either