Recent Comments

Well said. And the more I've thought about it, the more OK I am with status quo.

If going 8+2 or 9+1 only nets us 500k more per year, I don't think it's worth it to give up something that seems to be working. Hell, if you believe the reports, we made over $4 milion playing Tennessee this year.

Would I like to play Clemson & FSU more often? Sure. But I also don't think it's worth pissing off your two most high-profile football brands just to make sure that we do. Plus, if VT gets back to where we want to be every year, we WILL play them. And there, it will mean even more than a few extra bucks for one more ACC regular season game.

Also, I think the arms race has spread to the point where the Coastal has programs with facilities to compete against the big boys in the Atlantic. We've seen VT do it, UNC has done it, and Miami just announced their commitment to building an indoor practice facility. I think the playing field is starting to level a bit and as long as the Coastal has 2 or 3 teams in the national conversation every year, I can live with playing Clemson/FSU less in the regular season.

The biggest issue we've had in recent years is that nobody in the Coastal has really moved the needle - well if UNC stays somewhat relevant, Richt gets Miami in the conversation, and Pitt & GT provide quality games, I don't think we can ask for much more. Switch the annual crossover from BC to Louisville and it's icing on the cake.

To be fair Pitt is 6th nationally in rushing defense. Seems like a lot of teams struggle running the ball, though I'm far from an expert on why that would be. Perhaps its more because their pass defense is horrendous.

Do you think Trubisky is more of a problem than Williams? Williams was super mobile if inconsistent, which is the type of qb we seem to struggle with

Yes, but, academics and athletics are generally two separate pools, unless I'm missing something. The athletic department gets its funding from various sources, such as gate receipts, conference payouts, and the "Athletics Fee" tacked onto tuition, and uses that money completely for athletics. The academic side budget consists of tuition, research grants, endowment, state funding (for public schools), and other miscellaneous sources. I'm pretty sure the two pools don't mix, so saying "I'd rather spend the money on academics" doesn't really work because you aren't going to take the ESPN money and build classrooms with it.

I did love watching that kicker do the chop to all those F$U fans. He can enjoy his 15 minutes of fame. Let UNCheat get comfortable before they get hit by a hurricane...and I think there may be some weather down there too.

LSU -2.5 at Florida
Virginia Tech at North Carolina -2.5
Tennessee at Texas A&M -7.5
Alabama -13.5 at Arkansas
Florida State at Miami -3.5
UCLA -9.5 at Arizona State

As ready as we can be. We are far enough 1.3 miles from the ocean to not have to worry about storm surge and I got generator and supplies earlier this week.

LSU -2.5 at Florida
Virginia Tech at North Carolina -2.5
Tennessee at Texas A&M -7.5
Alabama -13.5 at Arkansas
Florida State at Miami -3.5
UCLA -9.5 at Arizona State

That's total and pointless speculation. I like where it is now and where it's positioned going forward.

But okay, I'll play along...what realistic decisions do you think could have been taken that would have put the league in an appreciably better position than it is now? And if those decisions had occurred what would be appreciably different for the league and the individual institutions?

And please don't pull out pie-in-the-sky nonsense like getting the ACCN deal done at the same time as the SECN deal. That was never going to happen under anybody's watch.

thanks
Yep I'm in favor of getting good insurance for several reasons and am well covered there.

The only downside is that they were supposed to install the generator next week.
Having been without electricity for a week after Opal I've always had a plan B for power

Hope you're all squared away with the family-

Given that the ACC is a mutt of small & large, public & private, northern & southern, urban & rural, football & basketball cultures (or neither) - I think that the ACC is in about as good a position as it possibly could be at present.

And, regardless of what reactionary, conspiracy everywhere, backward-facing, armchair conference commissioners may think, the conference is particularly well positioned for the critical next 15 years.

And ask yourself, why has there been no public comment by any ADs, ESPN or the league on any details of this decision? If this was some sort of forced compromise to keep FSU and Clemson happy, wouldn't somebody say something - even through backchannels? This has all of the same cone of silence earmarks that preceded most of the league's big decisions since the 2004 merger.

Pages