Recent Comments

It may just be an aberration, but Netflix just took a huge dive on the stock market because they didn't add as many subscribers as anticipated by analysts.

I only bring this up because it's a fairly important tidbit in the narrative that streaming OTT services will make cable go way of the dinosaurs sooner rather than later.

Show is so good. If you grew up in the 80's all the cues are great.
Even the opening credits/music have that feel from an 80's sci-fi show.

Gotta agree the girl that plays 11 is something.

I don't feel like this a good thing. This is a everyone has one, and we need to follow situation, that took years for them to make. If this happened before or at the same time the SEC did it, I would be much happier about it.

At this point it would have been better to be progressive and think ahead like the BIG did when they came up with their own station.

Making a deal with a streaming company for a streaming station is the power move that forces all others to follow down the road. Amazon is going to be a major provider of streaming sports very soon because they can outbid the cable companies.

I want us to take the next step instead of following the other companies. It's the only way to get ahead of the others and get better revenue.

Trends in the market

So I didn't see a better recent thread to post this, but apparently fansided has done a season preview for us:

http://nflmocks.com/2016/07/17/virginia-tech-complete-2016-season-preview/

The author, Sam Beckenstein, notes that we lost key contributors Brewer, Dadi, and Kendall. I found this interesting, in that Brewer gets sort of mixed reviews in my mind, Kendall was out most of the year, and Dadi (as french noted in another thread) may have been sort of a mixed blessing with his speed on the outside (plus his busted club of a hand).

He goes on to say that Ford, McMillan, and Moto are our key returnees. Ford is a no-brainer, but Travon, from all reports, hasn't locked down the starting position yet. We've yet to see how he'll be used, although I certainly would have said he was a key returnee as well. Moto, to me, is the biggest question mark. If he plays spectacularly this year our defense will be absurd.

I thought we discussed this recently but couldn't find the right thread.

I'm guessing the 2019 launch has something to do with existing contracts. If you're already locked in with Raycom or whoever, it'll be expensive to break those pre-existing contracts.

From what I've read, it looks like the digital channel will be available through the Watch ESPN app, meaning that you'll have to have an ESPN subscription to view it. If you're a cord-cutter, that leaves you with 2 options, I would think: either borrow a valid login from someone who still has traditional cable/satellite (I suspect there'll be a healthy black market for valid login credentials) or purchase ESPN through something like Sling TV. The second option was my plan for football season even before the ACC digital channel was announced. For $20/mo, you get 19 different cable channels, including ESPN and ESPN2. I'm assuming that subscribing to Sling TV will get me access to the ACC digital content, or else I will not be a happy camper.

Cable has at least another 25-30 year life span of similar returns because most adults in this country are not going to switch to an exclusive OTT solution. While growth is flat because 30 and unders are going to an alternative solution, the majority of viewers use traditional cable, fios or in home satellite. And ESPN is the only channel that can dictate its terms to the providers.

In 3 years, there will little change to the cable landscape but expect a different viewing experience with advertisers - to keep the cash flowing they have to find a solution to dvr'ing past commercials. I expect to see screen overlays, scoreboard sponsorships, 15 second breakaways, etc. to get the job done.

This. I intend to watch ACC games over the ESPN app but will not be signing up for a cable subscription. I wonder if the ACC digital channel will be on a separate sports package or not.

Yes, this. With Nigel and Woody starting and two guys earning the backup positions who have high expectations, the next line of guys was going to have a hard time getting reps. It's too bad, he'll be missed, but I don't think this will change our expectations too much.

It'd be cool if the digital broadcasts gave the option to choose your announcers. So we could listen to Jon (or Bill...?) and Mike instead of the 24th-best commentators ESPN has to offer for a Virginia Tech/Boston College nooner. I'm sure it won't happen but it would be easy enough to do

Hear you and not happy about it, but outside the ESPN penalty many national journalists thought there was no chance it would come to fruition right now given what is happening with PAC-10 network and cord cutting. Given what is happening with ESPN this isn't that surprising, and we all debated whether they would go network vs. digital option, looks like they split the baby and punted the network option down the road.

Wish we were getting the real thing, but I'll take it.

On a side note, some bullish on ACC network tied it to ND joining the ACC at some point. Yes, ND will never join a conference, we all know. The argument was premised on how heavily the committee emphasized a conference championship for making the playoff, and if ND missed a year because of this it could push boosters on the bubble over the edge. If that ever did happen, not that it will, it would push the ACC network way up in viewer base.

Not sure I totally agree, their deal is great, but missing a chance in the playoff could sway opinion.

Pages