Recent Comments
FSU
35
98-02
interesting because he is announcing around 4..
Michigan
33
01-06
It comes to mind first because it was the last one and most heart breaking. I was at the Auburn game and think that was the worst coaching job ever by Beamer.
Michigan
28
2005-2009
Auburn
34
2000-2004
Michigan
26
2008-2013
One cannot upvote this enough!
You can't unsee what has been seen....
BTW...do you live in Wise?
Auburn
30
2004-2009
FSU
55
79-83
FSU
31
03-07
I was hoping for a survey on if we thought VT would have gone on to win the game if the Michigan alum and President of the Sugar Bowl hadn't told the replay official it would not be ruled a catch.
Michigan
30
N/A
It'll be interesting to see the roster take shape as we recruit for the new system.
Auburn
31
03-07
FSU
24
2009-2013
I see his end game being he is going to help every side so that way whichever side wins, he can say he did what he could to get them there and has a place at the table. Even after the fiasco with Sansa, he can still say he got her out of Kings Landing, to safety with her aunt and then away from that crazy bitch. He just has to fall on the sword and say he made a mistake sending her to winterfell but he thought it was the best choice. He has a plausible story there. He also has control of the the knights of the Vale which he can bring to help the Starks or whoever he thinks will be the winner.
Texas, FSU
65
1968-1970, 1972-1975
Michigan
27
2009-2013
Michigan
25
2009-2013
Texas
25
2009-2013
Michigan
28
2005-2009
Michigan
24
2010-2015
I was in a similar situation as bluehokie2006. Though it's likely recency bias for me.
Source? His twitter says nothing.
Pac-12 replay officials/Michigan
31
2002-2006
You said first one to come to mind, and as I was clicking on the link I thought it might be a critical analysis of if it was a catch, which it was.

Michigan
23
Didn't go to VT :(