Recent Comments

He left Marquette in the Big East because his belief was that the power conference schools (ACC, B1G, SEC, P12, and B12) were about to significantly increase the gap between the themselves and everyone else. If this truly was his mindset, there is about a 0.0% chance he would even pick up the phone if Memphis called.

They are VT graduates and run the Sunset Villas there. I've known them for 35 years. I helped him demo and rebuild after Hurricane Wilma in 2005 - the entire island went under water for 18 hours. Great people. I think Bill is involved in Marathon/area city council or something like that. He is a good friend of Captain Scott Walker (Tailwalker) and helped with the filming boat for Scott's "Into the Blue" fishing show in the past.

I have no doubt Memphis is going to call Buzz (they probably already have). But I seriously doubt he'd go there. I mean, we don't know that Okie state backed up a money truck to Buzz's front door, but it felt like it. If Buzz is going to turn that down, what makes Memphis think he will agree to them?

Well, for one thing, outsiders have been taking "our" kids for years. Frank lost his stranglehold on the 757 years before he retired. However, if we are going to lose them to other programs, it's going to be because we get out-recruited, not because of some bogus camp that's really a recruiting conference. Other programs can compete with us, and we're damn well going to make them pony up a significant portion of their recruiting budget to do so.

These satellite camps were a loophole, plain and simple. And we used every ounce of leverage we could to close the loophole. You seem to be pretending that closing down these camps means the B1G can't recruit in Virginia anymore. Now they just have to actually play by the recruiting rules to do it.

Ive got a few friends who went through Q-school and played on the web.com tour and have said similar things as well as my uncle who goes to the Masters every year...hes said Sergio has toned it down in recent years, but my uncle still wont even follow him, same with Tiger, he said Tigers got a mouth on him off camera

Legs for you, good sir. I support this take.

Honestly, the idea of satellite camps doesn't bother me, but I take issue with it when it's used as a marketing tool for a specific university. I think a better solution might be something where you see universities in the same state collaborating for a camp, with perhaps interested coaching staffs from other states as observers (just not participating to push their brand).

I think a camp in Richmond sponsored jointly by VT, ODU, JMU, UVA (shudder), etc. might actually have some juice to bring in talent around the state, plus the optics are better.

Thanks for your reply.

These camps were all to benefit players who otherwise would not have been able to get exposure to those schools.

I have a hard time believing that kids need to have camps to get exposure. With the prevalence of HUDL and other similar highlight reel type things I'm fairly confident that any kid who plays high school football in the US would be able to get his film out there.

Instead of complaining that PSU was holding a 757 camp, we could have done one too.

Well, we couldn't because the ACC wouldn't allow it. Right?

You can make the argument that allowing the practice will skew recruiting to teams with big budgets, but now all this is doing is skewing it to teams with fertile recruiting grounds. How is that better?

I don't buy that logic. Teams all over the country have been recruiting kids from fertile recruiting grounds for years and years without satellite camps. I don't see how taking the camps away hinders schools from recruiting rich areas.

now you are screwing teams like Texas Tech and other isolated schools that were holding them in their own state. Now they have no access to the majority of Texas kids and they weren't even "encroaching" on other territories.

I'd actually be really interested to hear TT's perspective on this. On the one hand, they can't hold camps in their own state so maybe that hurts their outreach. On the other hand, based on your argument that schools in fertile recruiting grounds benefit from the banishment of the practice, TT would have to like the fact this practice is banned since Texas is such a rich recruiting area, right?

I think that your argument that TT, which is in a rich recruiting area, is getting screwed by the practice being banned directly contradicts your argument that teams in rich recruiting areas stand to benefit from the practice being banned since outside schools can no longer recruit TT's recruit-rich home state (Texas).

My favorite Crowell quote...

"Going in, I didn't know what to think of him," Crowell said. "But when I got there and started talking to him, I realized he was a really humble dude, he's a brilliant guy, he's bright, he's got a great vision when it comes to the program, and not just football, but developing young men as well. Preparing them for the next 50 years, not just four years, and I thought he had a real good handle on that. I loved everything about him."

That's good stuff right there. This kid's going to be OK.

Take the geography out of it and it's still wrong. It reinforces a "haves" vs. "have-nots" environment that is unsustainable. Does every school have the budget that Michigan does to jet-set around the country wherever they'd like to showcase their program? No. Now, I don't necessarily think we need to have enforced equality (or the illusion thereof) here, but for an organization (the NCAA, and by proxy, the conference commissioners) that steadfastly claims academics over athletics in the growing face of college football as business, the only justifiable move is to maintain equality in matters like these. Huge entities with massive budgets now cannot crush the little guy.

Of course it cant work in reverse. "All" the talent is in the south. Does that mean only the south should have access to them? So now instead of everyone being able to access all players, teams have to stay localized?

Not surprised at all to see TKP backing up this exclusionary ruling after the hissy fit it threw about the PSU satellite camps at ODU. As if Virginia players belong to us. How dare an outsider take our kids

Well, personally I think you're bass-ackwards on this one. These satellite camps were a gimmick to allow major programs to recruit without it coming out of the recruiting budget or falling under recruiting guidelines. It wasn't a "recruiting visit," it was a "camp." The SEC and ACC saw them for what they were and banned them, while the B1G, probably realizes their own backyard isn't exactly fertile soil for the type of high school recruit that championship-level P5 football targets right now, and was all about getting into recruiting hotbeds.

The reason it was unfair is that it can't work in reverse. Sure, we could do satellite camps in Texas and California, but we don't need to. We are already located in close proximity to a recruiting hotbed. And nobody is going to be knocking down doors to set up a satellite camp in Indiana or Iowa. The B1G was in a position to gain everything and lose nothing from this practice. Literally every other conference stood to lose from this setup. It is absolutely a no-brainer to ban them.

Pages