Recent Comments
Jim Weaver also should get some credit as the effective CFO for the growth years.
I have some big issues with stuff like this and so should the NCAA. It tilts the balances even more so to schools with deep pockets. It is purely a recruiting tool and a selling point that some schools could afford to do and others can't which gives them an unfair advantage. How do they manage the coaches talking and visiting with recruits while they are there and do they count as in-home visits? Very big can of worms this is going to open up.
Private school, less information. I would treat that list with lots of skepticism
As a finance guy, I like this.
Thanks. Thought it was worth coming in from lurking to post
That's what...
Never mind. Too easy.
Why is USC so low?
I guess it turns out that VT is a national brand, after all.
Upvoted for general content.
Will now create dummy account to upvote second time for Hilgartafterya.
There are numerous coaches in college football that have largely meaningless titles. You can twist it however you want
I wonder if Div. II, III and FCS have more injuries because of deficiencies in S&C, or if the higher level of play at the CFP level causes more knee injuries.
Also need a breakdown of contact vs non-contact injuries. If you get a big boy rolling up on you from the side, there isn't but so much you can do about that.
I have a feeling that's going to be a requirement of every position coach Fuente hires.
That might be one of the biggest heads I have ever seen
Good points. Can I add "Ability to recruit" to that list?
I'm not sure about these valuations and it's certainly eye opening to see some of the programs listed where they are. (Kansas State? Washington?)
That said, I looked at this and thought of it in the current context of VT football as:
This is what Frank Beamer built.
Without him, we aren't even on this list. He took over a fledgling company and built it into a $270M empire. His Board of Directors helped him a lot and the successor was effectively identified. But much of the value of this program is from Frank himself.
Is the table comparing base salary + bonuses for 2015 to base salary only for 2016?
no wonder Texas is a little tighty with their performance.
Damn, I wish I had legs to give.
Seriously? Is that the direction we're steering this now? Accusing our new head coach of creating cushy vacuous job titles for his friends?

If Clemson wins it all tonight, I imagine their value would bump up a bit.
Just glad to see we are ahead of LOLUVA.
yes, sorry
that was my first thought when I heard the news: how big of a sample size do you need to determine whether a staff, or a technique or group of techniques, is better or worse than another? I suspect it would be more than one team over three years. You would probably have to have several schools where all the staffs follow one regimen, and a sufficient control group to tell if there really is a correlation.
IOW, even if we don't have a single knee injury for the next three years, that will not be sufficient data to say Hilgartafterya is better than Gentrification. Does that sound right?

So you accuse our coach of cronyism, then when you get called out on it, you accuse me of twisting your words because you're claiming it's a widespread practice in college football.
