Recent Comments
Beautiful

Just because only UNC got caught does not mean half the SEC does not do it. Many of the SEC and Texas conference fans I know think their school does stuff like that - because they have to to keep up with the others -and only make fun of UNC for getting caught.
I've heard my dad talk about this. Never seen a picture until now. I think he said before the yellow can it was just a black and white can. I can't even imagine what the contents taste like.
*Edit for grammar.
Which was obviously the beginning of the end of his tenure. I don't really see your point here. Stiney was on the way out at that point, due to an uproar from the fan base that Beamer just couldn't ignore anymore. Frank was looking for a way to maintain staff stability while addressing the issues that had become too big to sweep under the 10-win rug any longer.
If anything, it's the exception that proves the rule.
yes he is set to announce Saturday. Personally i'd rather have snelson than any of them.
I am okay with this, as long as we also beat OSU and sweep the ACC. And win the ACCCG. And go to the playoffs.
I wish I still had that CD. What a great compilation.

Making the best out of a bad situation:

HOAT, is this a relative of yours?

And I'm not sure what this guy was trying to do, but it ended up being very funny:

Here is where we finished last year:
https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/ranking/non-conference-sos...
Replace W&M with furman (W&M 7-5, furman 3-9)
Western Michigan with Purdue (Western Michigan was 8-5, 6-2 in the MAC; Purdue was 3-9; 1-7 in the BIG10 they did beat WM though)
the other 2 remain the same.

ohh kill emm..
PS Pryor had to get some sort of written letter/approval from OSU so that he could go and do the Browns Scrimmage at the shoe,
Well, that about does it.
The ball psi isn't critical (and can easily be regulated by the NFL when they choose to enact those measures)
1) I don't like your tone, go to your room.
2) I could pick apart your entire argument, but I don't feel like there is a point. What I will say is that rules are a part of the game for a reason. The PSI may not be "critical", but underinflated footballs are easier to throw and to tuck.
3) 

Those are TOTAL schedules I mean they list UF as having a tough schedule, in conference yes out I mean come on, New Mexico, FAU, FSU and o wait look ECU.
|
11 years 1 day
# | Top 2016 Prospects Visit Blacksburg for a Hokies Cookout, Pair Set for Imminent Decisions Good to hear the coaches made the family pitch. Anytime you see a big recruit committing to Clemson or UGA, the first thing you hear is about how they have a great family atmosphere and feel at home.
On another note, the guest list for the Ohio State game should be absurd.
unfortunately, I can definitely see a new HC coming in and wanting to replace Bud. He would have no sense of ownership of half the game. I mean, who is going to tell Bud how the defense needs to change? No one. A smart HC would keep him on and let him be completely autonomous, but if there's any sort of personality clash the HC wouldn't want to go toe to toe with someone who's been at the school for so long and has the reputation Bud does.
It would be like having to give a talk on offensive line play and French is sitting there in the front row scribbling notes for questions to ask when you're done. Sure, he knows his stuff and could probably enhance the conversation, but you would really rather have an audience of noobs.
Why not four NFL? Heck. Make it five.
You realize that after we beat Purdue in a close match they are going to go on and sweep the B1G, right? That is just the way things are going to play out.
My issue with the ranking is how much credit they are giving to ECU. I follow ECU and don't think they will be nearly as good as they getting credit for. It's a rebuilding year for them. We play OSU who is obviously going to be in contention for the playoff again and then 2 very poor teams (furman/purdue) and one team that will probably be a 6-7 win type team in ECU. If ECU was to hit their win total over the last 3 stretch as this article suggests I would probably agree with them.
Here are three that don't mention us as being in the top 10 or even 25 in some cases:
http://collegespun.com/national/the-15-toughest-schedules-in-college-foo...
http://www.fbschedules.com/2015/03/2015-college-football-strength-of-sch...
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2368401-ranking-college-footballs-25-...
I'm convinced that your "fat fingering" is really just a ploy so that we can all post ridiculous gifs and not worry about staying on topic. I approve.


Great forum topic, here is my contribution
http://gfycat.com/ImpureColdIndianringneckparakeet
edit: working on a gfycat embed still, the iframe is huge
Ok let's try this
reading tweets regarding this is like reading tea leaves: no one has a damned clue what's going on, but there's lots of crap to look at and any number of ways to twist what little is reported.
The "three things" quote is Woody Hayes, not Beamer.

We are passing more now than the program ever has under Beamer.
That's what I was saying when I said you could argue he hires the wrong type of OC. Frank wants a multiple offensive scheme that values the run. Every OC he's ever had has put that type of offense on the field. So yes, he certainly does affect the offense in the fact that he has a say in the type of OC we go after, but there's no evidence he does anything at all to control the offense that the OC is running. I have never heard of him overruling a called play in-game, nor giving any offensive directive other than the generic "run the ball more" sort of thing that every coach is going to do.