Recent Comments

From my understanding, there are some moving on, and others not, but it's not as big of "news" recently. I'd have to do a little more research into it, which frankly I don't want to research any further on something with LOLUVA, but there was more to it than what is even posted on that Wiki.

You could probably type 'Teresa Sullivan Scandal' into Google and find out the worst parts about it. If I recall correctly, she was ousted not for just any old disagreement, but for practices that border on illegality (not exactly illegal, but should be). I don't remember everything as I was too busy with my own life at the time to pay that much attention, but I remember thinking to myself that only UVA would rehire someone they fired for doing something so wrong. I do Improv and for a while, she and that whole situation was a running gag.

Things like this get me thinking:

I'm curious in how many other countries this would even be a news story?

Could the same be said for models?

Aren't human vices wonderful? Someone (or a group of people) can consider it morally wrong, create a law against it or make it taboo, and someone else (or a group of people) can turn it into a multi-billion dollar industry.

I watched basically identical basketball three times over last night. Every two-possession game takes on the same character - just foul and hope you can come back. It's horribly boring to watch. I had a radical thought while watching, similar to what you're saying about increasing the penalty. These intentional fouls are clearly not done in any effort to play the ball, so why the heck aren't they flagrant fouls? I say enforce those rules. That would make the last 2:00 or so way more interesting in close games, such that teams are actually forced to play defense rather than just slap somebody.

I was listening to ESPN Radio last week and this game was a common upset alert. The analysts I heard from all thought this was a really bad match up for Oklahoma. They also drew a lot of attention to Dayton/OSU. Seemed to be a pretty common theme.

Edit: Harvard was consistently in the discussion as well

Yup. I was living in NOVA from '82-'00, huge soccer fan. Went to the MLS final where we won it against ... Colorado Rapids? Epic. Home game in the championship. Awesome

I think you should be able to decline free throws for the ball back just like you get before the bonus and just like in football. I don't think they should give you a whole new shot clock, but it would mean teams getting wins in games where they outplayed the opponent. It unfortunately would also make for some less exciting games however. But the opposing team might actually try to get a steal than purposely (aka intentionally) foul in order to win a game.

I remember him on the bench when I was there-he got some signficant minutes playing, but those teams at that time were pretty stacked-Everhart was more of a role player.
Big ole' lunky guy who played hard for the Hokies.
If I am correct, he went straight on to graduate assistant, and was always going into coaching.
Not a sexy name, but neither was 'Beamer' when he was hired.

So...we talk about the AD and frugal...is there someone HIGHER than the AD that might have something to say about spending?

Wow that dude really riled up some people. Personally I think Whit has been a breathe of fresh air. I really believe he will get the right coach in here and I can't wait to see the results. I'll be patient.

On Weaver, I really think his illness played a bigger role in his final years, because some decisions just didn't make sense. Hopefully he gets well now.

I guess I'm the only one, but I am really interested to know how Jake Johnson did. I remember being absolutely stoked about this guy and pissed when he left. Actually, I thought he left on bad terms, so good to see that was not the case.

Other than that, I especially like the irony of Journell's comments:

I left here on a good note with coach Beamer and all the coaches and I kind of went off and did my own things training-wise and all that for a little while

getting dismissed is rarely on a good note, but if anyone could do it then it would be Beamer.

and,

Me being here and all the scouts seeing me here has shown them, OK, this guy is pretty mentally tough and is not just going to shy away from what he wants to do, even if the odds are against him,

I'm assuming he means mentally tough to come back after being dismissed, but I find it humorous that he uses that term when he made so many boneheaded decisions. And the odds are only stacked against him because he did the stacking. Good luck to him though and glad he seems to have turned the corner.

Pages