Recent Comments

Ali Jennings is an "odu roster" guy. Fans were into him, correct? They cheered for him. Put 85 of them in maroon and orange running out to enter sandman and there won't be a noticable difference, especially the moment they go 6-7 again. We did that with "VT" players - what would ODU's roster do? 2-10? 1. the talent levels aren't bama vs. VT... VT has better players yes, but not by some huge disparity across the board. Give me their safeties this year as a matter of fact. You are fooling yourself if you think a slight dip in talent would be noticeable in terms of fan engagement. It hasn't stopped VT fans as the talent has slipped big time year over year the past 15 years.

I'd gladly take ODU's roster and play in a league with other regional teams with similar rosters that were made up of student athletes that largely planned to stay at VT until graduation or bigger and better things. We wouldn't' be competitive with the best in the sport, but we aren't anyway. Let the pro's play each other in a new league and leave college football for college student athletes. Pay the athletes if needed and let them have jobs and endorsements if they want, but their participation is tied to being a student for their university. I'm 100% on board with this versus what we have now, which is a team with 25% roster turnover every year whose primary reason for being here is because we're the highest bidder.

Mike Young should not be at risk. He had to replace 80% of his roster and about 92% of scoring from last year thanks to having his NIL taken away. He also isn't getting the budget that the majority of other ACC programs in terms of assistant coaches and staff. Last time I checked 12 ACC teams have the full five assistant coaches. Young has three. Every aspect of the program is operating below the majority of ACC programs due to money.

...

Whit's seat should be scalding for what he did to basketball for menial results in football more so because of the football side.

It's a complete embarrassment what Whit has done to MBB. Buzz had us inches away from an Elite 8 and Whit failed to hold on to him, or build on any of the momentum from Buzz's tenure. Despite Whit's mismanagement, Mike Young got us an ACC champs banner to hang in the rafters. ACC champs and we still have to operate with a skeleton coaching staff. What a joke.

I guess the good news with college hoops is that all the AD has to do is turn the money spigot back on. You can fill out your coaching staff and completely turn the roster over in a single offseason these days. Not that there's any reason to expect Whit to do that.

2024 was the first season since 2012 we sold out all the home games. Why was 2023's 7-6 different enough to inform ticket sales for 2024 relative to the preceding decade? You really honestly dont think that had anything at all to do with the players we had returning? Either unrestricted player movement is bad for fan engagement or it isn't.

Hold on... a team coming off 7-6 sold out lane last year, but I am supposed to believe Lane is half empty with high 2 stars vs. 3 star players? that's laughable. The talent is down CONSIDERABLY since the mid 2000s to the same fan engagement.

"The idea that you could switch VT's roster with ODU's roster and that you'd see no drop in fan excitement is wrong"- we are 6-7... I doubt there would be much difference at all in fan excitement. And ironically our boosters vastly overpaid for an ODU kid to be on this team.

I just don't see that the players have much value without the university. The only good or service being sold is entertainment, and most people with the ability to pay for that don't care about the potential athletic ability of high school teenagers.

But most fans care about their university winning, and better players means more winning, thus fans pay (directly or indirectly) for better players.

The idea that you could switch VT's roster with ODU's roster and that you'd see no drop in fan excitement is wrong, and we all know this. Joe knows that winning teams = more TKP members and interaction. Every business in Blacksburg (hell, the NRV) knows that VT football doing well is better for business. And I think we can all agree that better players = better team.

This is not the NFL, and to try to make it some watered down professional league isn't going to work and I think the bubble is going to burst.

As long as the university logo is on the jersey, the league will be financially viable. And as long as the university logo is on the jersey, fans will want the best players to play on their teams because fans care about winning.

If you think its the name on the backs of the jersey, just look at the millions of examples of proof that it isn't. aTm sells more tickets now than they ever did with Manziel. OSU kinda survived without Maurice Clarrett, ya think? Duke hoops did OK when Zion left. VT sold out Lane last year for a bad team in general 25 years after Mike Vick. It's the name on the front. Can't think of an example where it hasn't been. Hank Gathers at Loyola Marymount, Larry Bird at Indiana State- maybe those 2.

I think many of us are just starting to realize that, in the end, it's just a damn game. It's entertainment, and the reason we participate in it and spend money on it is because it used to represent a university that we had some tie to and that entertained us. I just don't see that the players have much value without the university. The only good or service being sold is entertainment, and most people with the ability to pay for that don't care about the potential athletic ability of high school teenagers. This is not the NFL, and to try to make it some watered down professional league isn't going to work and I think the bubble is going to burst. I could be wrong, and I wish everyone the best, but it's not entertaining me like it used to and I think others feel similarly in large numbers.

Pages