Recent Comments

You still dont have to read it. I don't!

Got to build the house for the $EC to live in....

I hope the kid get paid and is an absolute flop so we can continue to laugh at these collectives throwing millions of dolllrs at kids that have no proven value.

He's unhappy with the Moore hire basically
He wanted this guy instead...

Woke up from a migraine induced nap and this is the first thing I read. Realized my brain required ChatGPT. So here's its interpretation:

This passage appears to be a combination of sports commentary, frustration, and skepticism about the performance and potential of a college football team, specifically focusing on the offensive line (oLine). Here's a breakdown of the key points and ideas:

1. **Praise and Criticism of Teams**: The writer references a variety of teams and players:
- "home-state C.news," "BIG time UGA1," and "Vice-Squad" are likely references to college football programs, each receiving mixed reviews.
- "n.Dame1" (Notre Dame) is mentioned as having talent, but the implication seems to be that just having talent isn't enough.
- "po' Crooked" might refer to a team or player with issues, possibly underperforming.

2. **Lack of Analysis**: The writer expresses disappointment that most people aren't critically analyzing the situation, relying on surface-level praise without any deeper critique or film study. This suggests frustration with how teams or players are being evaluated.

3. **Pass Protection**: The writer notes that pass protection (the ability to protect the quarterback) seems somewhat better than expected but questions how this will align with a coach's desire to focus on a run-heavy offense (which is often a hallmark of certain teams like Virginia Tech and coach Brent Pry). This could be a concern about whether the team is structured in a way that best suits its offensive strategy.

4. **Offensive Line Struggles**: The writer points out the offensive line's weaknesses, referring to their low rankings (115th in run-blocking and 92nd in pass protection) and a "learning curve" that has been reset multiple times in recent years. This suggests that the offensive line is underperforming, with little improvement due to turnover or lack of development.

5. **Coaching and Personnel Concerns**: There's skepticism about the head coach or offensive line coach's ability to fix these issues. The line "why is this oLine Coach1, *the*, one?" suggests questioning whether the offensive line coach is truly the right person for the job given the team's struggles and ongoing issues.

6. **Talent and Hype**: The writer is critical of the "hype train" surrounding certain players or programs, pointing out that despite the praise, there has been little tangible success (described as an "Amtrak derailing"). This seems to imply that the hype doesn't match the reality, particularly in terms of performance and improvement.

7. **Final Point on Coaching and Results**: The writer ends by noting that the offensive line coach may only have a year to prove himself ("1-year" unless an extension is granted), questioning whether the team can turn things around with the current leadership.

In summary, this passage seems to be a blend of skepticism and frustration regarding a football team's offensive line performance, coaching decisions, and the gap between hype and reality. The writer seems to be critical of the lack of critical thinking or deeper analysis, questioning whether the right coaching staff is in place to address the team's issues.

Well... everyone told me how great home-state C.news was. Likewise BIG time UGA1 was. Ditto Vice-Squad (who at least went at peeps kinda hard at times). n.Dame1 (who looks pretty shiny with all that Talent(s), again-- right); and then po' Crooked.

That's every1-- in case you are keeping score @home... no analysis, no film-study; nary a critical thinking.

So, what Eye can see early on?

Seems a bit better at pass-pro'... how does that fit us/VeeTee and Pry's desire to run first?

Additionally, none of my w.V.u. sources are left crying. Same as what I wrote of the ex-Baylor-Qb3.
And... he has nearly nothing left to work with off of the objectively: 115th best run-blockers and the 92nd best V-cup guys {sic: pass-pro'}. Plus the Learning Curve is on its 3rd time (o, o, o, o) reset in 5 years. Nearly all of the Experience Curve is gone to boot. Now we have guys who could not beat out the '24 Baltic Ave (sans even a single house) 1's, and they have what(s)???

i.e., everyone is *THE* one b.street!!! (On, day no.1; granted)... nonetheless; where are they on day-(n)one?

This Moore is the new mo' guy has basically 1-year; unless Whitlock extends Pry... see?

"Hype Train all a (message) aboard!!!"

Well, where Eye breaking-tape come from the hype train just went an Amtrak derailing o fer 5, see?

So, tell me... with all of that science-fact obviously in place... why is this oLine Coach1, *the*, one❔

DISCUSS >>> cuss

🤔
b.street

Very satisfying to read the collective opinion on this hire. All positive so far (best I can see). And unlike Rudolph I will trust that Coach Moore is planning on starting and finishing a job.

The shitbag is still at it

"Are you trying to find the best 12 or the most deserving 12?"@KirkHerbstreit spoke to @PatMcAfeeShow about his thoughts on the 12 teams selected for the College Football Playoff. pic.twitter.com/qx82jAM87c— ESPN College Football (@ESPNCFB) December 23, 2024

If the Pavia ruling stands it may mean Brumgield has another year of eligibility.

{b.street's} "And... ?" {/feets}

My 4 decades+ State and #24 in Sporting News winning cleats are right behind me... almost put 'em on for the Usyk v. Fury tilt...

b.street

welllllllll... I'd like to say it could not hurt.

Tho' Eye can 'hear' the grindstone puttin' in sparky work on those pitchfork tips... too. (So, although want to answer a 'yes'... I gotta say I doubt it... which is social needia 2day=everything sad).

💯
b.street

Say "Hi" to them, but not "Hey baby, how you doin'?"