
Recent Comments
Here's what we're gonna dew to Perdoo

I think that's more to fit the design of the "5 Things" image. We're not going to wear all-maroon on the road.
I assume that word is "correct." :P
11 safeties and 1 field goal.
see my response to Hokie07
I would like to have a word with you
Wouldn't read too much into it. The Ford pic is from last year and the standard helmet was just inserted into the header at the top.
Its not like the break between quarters is going to get shorter if we don't do it...the amount of time is already determined.
I enjoy it, my classmates enjoy it. We in fact look forward to it. If the Hokey-Pokey were taken away there would be riots.
so, 2 TDs with one-point EPs, 3 field goals, and a two-point return?
Or 3 TDs with one-point EPs and 2 two-point plays?
Either way - scoring 25 is difficult because it does require some 2-point plays somewhere (could be 3 TDs, 2 one-point EPs, one 2-point EP)
I like it for snoozer games like Furman, but absolutely hate it for real games like OSU. I think it kills the energy.
The problem with our running game hasn't been DLs
You're twisting my words. I did not say "This offense has a problem and the problem is this"
I'm arguing that if there is a problem with our running game, which is debatable, it isn't DLs which is the proposition made by the original comment.
I do not explicitly say our running game has a problem. You inferred that. I'm just postulating, based on the original comment, that if there is a problem with our running game, it is NOT the DL
So you DON'T grow up. You just go straight to becoming the most insufferably, obnoxious, doucheass. Got it.
Of course. Theoretically and hypothetically.
But your original statement explicitly stated that there was a problem with the VT running game and what that problem is. I didn't see how -- from just two games against two teams at polar opposite ends of the bell curve in which the VT running game ranged from respectable to excellent -- one could conclude that 1) there is a problem and 2) that the problem is with opposing LBs.
Louisville
Duke
Georgia Tech
Stanford
Alabama
UCLA
I think contrast and visibility probably play into the decision somewhat. For instance, you don't want to wear a white helmet if the other team is wearing a white helmet, you want your QB to be able to pick up the color instantly. Contrast is a good thing. Purdue is likely wearing gold this week, since they wore a white one last week. I think they may have a black one this year too, so that might be in play, and would be a good reason to wear our white one.
Oh the terrible meme's you could make out of this......
But in both cases, we're talking about kids with NFL talent, how many underclassmen does VT have with NFL talent we redshirted that are going to leave early? Bucky comes to mind, but one could easily argue it was the year he spent redshirting that allowed his switch to TE that put him in a position to leave early.
Thanks!
Glad to see you sticking around!
I'd wager it varies by position.
QB has the largest learning curve, 5th year might help.
OL's need to build up size, 5 years might help
RB have short careers, and the learning curve is not as large, they should try to get to the NFL as quick as possible.
EDIT: obviously I tremendously over simplified it, but I think that's the concept.
The motorcycle helmet with the half-sized VT that is barely discernible on TV?
I thought Whit was much smarter than that...
Centreville HS graduate. Now a guy who taught her in his English class there. Said she was just a really cool girl in HS. Glad to see her doing well. And looking great, the candid photo notwithstanding...

