Recent Comments

At least we don't have to have that debate here. I would have been a big supporter. It's college basketball, there are no priests here.

He definitely has returned (unless something crazy has happened in the past couple weeks), but I think French's point is that he hasn't been in Gentry's program, done any football drills that we know of, worn pads, had any contact work, etc. in about a year (his first real work with the team being whenever he joined winter workouts in January).

Cassell Coliseum is a study in a wasted revenue opportunity in the NRV.

We desperately need a multi-purpose facility at Virginia Tech. Badly. We need a venue that will attract shows and concerts year round to bring in additional revenue to our athletic dept to offset the costs of operating the building, because, to be quite frank, we don't bring in nearly enough fans on an annual basis for basketball to make anything else feasible.

And Cassell doesn't have any bad seats? I beg to differ. Those corner seats are cramped and they are bad. Sat in there numerous times when I was a student and I hated it. Yes, the rest of the seats are good, but once again... wasted revenue streams. Why? Absolutely no way to put in corporate suites, and the corporate suites are the ones that make you bank in owning a facility. And for those of us who constantly complain that we need students ringing the court.... Have you ever tried to sit behind someone who stands all game long in Cassell? You can't do it and still see the game. So you're gonna try to tell me that we should ring Cassell with standing students directly in front of the bigtime donors who generally are the elder alumni who, in most cases, physically cannot stand for an entire game. And before you suggest sinking the court and the first few rows, consider how much the court is already sunk on the baselines.

Cassell needs to be replaced. Its an outdated arena that eliminates potential revenue opportunities in the NRV. At this point, we should already be considering a 10-15 year plan to develop, build, and open a new facility for VT athletics. We're not Duke. They're able to keep Cameron around because they're DUKE, the name of the school is plenty to sell to a recruit, and they have had numerous historically great players playing on that court, so the aura and mystique of the place sells itself. Cameron has every bit the historical importance to its sport that Fenway, Wrigley, or Yankee Stadium has/had on baseball. Comparing Cameron to Cassell would be like trying to put one of those 3 places on the same level as say, Veterans Stadium.

Yeah, I think he got a new contract since the 2008 article I was referencing. Makes sense, he had a helluva team last year. Obviously, we can't do $3M.

I'm not opposed to keeping Cassell the same. I'm not opposed to some subtle upgrades. I wouldn't even mind a pretty massive overhaul...as long as it's done right. That's the key right there, it needs to be done right. If we have the same guy who picks our football Uni's in charge of renovations to Cassell, I'd rather it just stay the same.

Or a well trained, scrappy engineer. Or a horse. On a treadmill.

I hate that title of the article. Fuck you, this the DBU. Every DB in the country seriously considered VT if we offer.

Good luck to our mat Hokies!
The wrestling program was almost ended a few years ago and was turned around by the right coach and with the right mentality. Their continued success is well-deserved; almost nothing exemplifies a Hokie more than a well-trained, scrappy wrestler performing above expectations (except for maybe a well-trained, scrappy soldier performing above expectations.)

Go Hokies!

For those who didn't watch it:

- Made decision to fire Coach Johnson Sunday night, informed him yesterday
- Emphasis on coach with head coaching experience
- Reasonable expectations are real improvement year-to-year
- Long-term goals are consistently be in contention for the NCAA tournament & be in top half of ACC
- Willing to let the new coach time to rebuild
- Will be financially aggressive "for the right guy"
- He tempered expectations on getting a "big name hire" & about how difficult it is to pick the right "up and comer"
- Might take until the end of the final four to make a decision, no deadline for decision (mentioned potential candidates are coaching in the tourney right now)
- Wants a coach willing to "scrap and fight"

Sounds like we need to make sure that we carry out the promises we made to Isaiah Ford so that he can relay that to these guys who will have high expectations upon arrival. This will get interesting to see if Isaiah can become another CJ Reavis or JC Coleman and become a huge, huge advocate for VT.

Fair enough. I guess I imagined reading it as I remembered the story about him returning, including AJ Hughes's tweet regarding his return. My apologies.

Its all in how they negotiate their buyout. JJ is getting $800K over three years but could be less depending on what job he gets next and when. The new school isn't on the hook for anything necessarily, although they might try to negotiate a lower rate while the person still gets paid by their old school but that again is how they negotiate their new contract.

I think we can all agree that the situation was handled poorly by all parties and nobody came out of it clean.

You can renovate it, for God's sake put a swanky new floor down or something, so 80's to look at that thing... make it Cameron-esque and a "beautiful, fun and terrifying place to come play against the Hokies... you just need 10,000 rabid fans to lose their minds... no need for a new facility (consistently winning would be your first argument to even broach that talk) and we don't need it...

This article has him at $3.16 M/year thru 2020. Anyone know how the contracts work when you're fired - is it like football where the team that hires a recently fired coach only has to pay them a portion of their salary (i.e. Loeffler made $150k from VT last year and a lot more from Auburn)?

Pages