Recent Comments

Sometime during the 1999 or 2000 season, my elementary school had a VT Football night - basically some players and the Hokie Bird etc there to sign autographs, give us an up close look at their helmets and padded jerseys and answer kids' questions, that kind of thing. I think it must have been the 2000 season because I distinctly remember Lee Suggs being there and he wasn't a starter in '99.

This guy was there too. At 9 I wasn't sure why there needed to be a Hokie Bird and also a Hokie Man, but I remember thinking he was pretty cool. I wonder what happened to him, he stopped being a fixture at games sometime in the 2000s.

Curious to see how surgical Franklin gets with the current roster...23 HS kids coming in (including Pina) who are assured spots. My guess is 25-30 players from the portal? Idk.

I know this is going to sound like I am beating a dead horse but why didn't it feel like you were a real sucker donating to the coaches of an amateur sport? These coaches make millions and VT was selling out games with Pry and Fuente so its not the coaches bring in the fans.

I don't want to discourage anyone from donating their money to the Hokie Club or NIL (I want to win and understand that's what it takes to win these days), but at this point it feels like you have to be a real sucker to donate your hard earned money to pay the salaries of these professional athletes.

I would be on the side of college isnt job training, but there are numbers of things that could be put in an athletics degree that are in the spirit of higher learning. Assuming we are preparing athletes for the pros then it also needs to educate for life after pros.

The biggest issue is most college athletes don't go pro. I know that programs direct the athletes to certain majors and do some shady stuff but I would aee this as something that could be worse than what we see today. We want to stay away from UNC territory.

Ultimately, I don't disagree.

There are other options to play Professional Football, but they are economically more limited than those in Basketball. And I think there is some logic in that argument. Also think that there's little chance of being scouted outside of U.S. football, other than maybe Canada. In contrast every NBA team has International Scouts full time at this point.

Unlike the Diego Pavia argument... I wasn't good enough to play D1 out of high school, so I should just be able to delete the years I don't want...and extend eligibility. Those are the sorts of arguments that are being made (somehow successfully) in this era.

I've said an earlier post, I think the Public's tolerance with these sorts of situations are going to wane quickly.

When Purdue or someone loses in the NCAA tournament to a team that signed a 7'2" International Player in January, there will be controversy and eventually reprisal.

Ultimately, I think the writing is beginning to hit the wall here. These are guys who've been told since the age of 12 that they're going to be professional athletes that are rich and famous. And they're having to deal with the fact that, that simply isn't true. They're taking advantage of a bubble Market that is going to burst, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't call out the obvious bullshit like this.

I'm suggesting giving athletes the option to make their sport a fully integrated piece of their academic ventures, similar to a reimagined work study program or something like that.

My thought is: if you believe that colleges are supposed to do everything possible to prepare you for a profession in your area of study (you could absolutely argue this is not a college's job, but suppose you do), then why not lean into that with naked ambition?

I'm not saying I completely agree with this viewpoint, but it's definitely something I've started thinking through (as I walk my dogs) during this new era of college sports

Pages