Recent Comments

Nope.... My football time on weekends is solely scheduled around the Bills from now on. Until the administration gets serious about fielding a competitive program, I'm done giving them my time.

Keeping my TKP sub though, you guys rockπŸ˜‰πŸ‘

Spray paint on a field and intentionally killing 100+ year old trees are much different actions. Stealing mascots, ect. has been happening for ages.

No denial that college costs are far outpacing income gains for the vast majority. But please explain to me how adding additional fees that are completely unnecessary and unrelated to education helps that?

Do we start throwing Kerosene on house fires because the house already looks like a loss??

Like I said in another thread...money isn't always the solution...ask Duke how they feel about their QB Investment this week.

We could spend tons of money, put more people in more life-altering debt and win 7 games.

I don't even plan on watching the rest of the season at this point. Pumpkin patches and corn mazes, here I come this fall!

Is this surprising? We could have won both previous games by 50 and no one but the most faithful Hokie fans were ever going to watch us play Wofford.

Such a shame, Pry probably gets a 1 score win finally.

This makes me sad...

Terrordome, indeed

Plans to go hiking Saturday morning. First time in a while I've haven't scheduled my September weekends around football.

It wasn't all that long ago we had fans sneaking into opposing stadiums to deface their field....

also the price of higher education has a lot more problems than college football lol

Let's be honest ... we don't even deserve a broadcast so Snoonzer's is about the next worst option.

FOR EXAMPLE - Pry is 1-12 in one-score games? What if that record (which it should be) was ATLEAST 6-7? How much more respect would we have as a program, how much more momentum? It wouldn't solve every issue we currently face... but things would be better.

Here's the problem...when you use the term "VT"...you don't acknowledge that "VT" is comprised of individuals who have their own concerns, priorities, and financial situations.

So while "VT" may want to have a good Football team, John may want to afford Tuition next semester.

I have no Problem with VT Administration exploring options to increase funding but I have a huge problem mandating it on people without them having any opportunity to consent.

Ultimately, VT needs more money...if the Boosters and Fanbase aren't willing or able to raise it, then you have your answer--"VT" maybe doesn't have enough people that place an absolute priority on Football for this to work.

VT also doesn't have fans sneaking onto opposing Campuses to poison trees..and I don't consider that a bad thing.

This is spot on. Yes we need more funding and can continue to push for that, but week-to-week better results with what we do have would help keep interest up across the board - from fans, from donors, from recruits, etc. We have a TODAY issue that starts with coaching and not using their current resources to maximize potential.

That to me told me EVERYTHING we needed to see on him...bring on Rangel or Brand. Could not believe he ran right into that. A yard in either direction and he goes for 30+ yards.

I know he's a bit of a weirdo, but I think there's a non-zero chance if we hired Dan Mullen in 2015 that he would still be our head coach today.

Maybe but I think that novelty would wear off pretty quickly. I'll be curious how UNC's TV numbers are this year, but i think for most people they'll tune into see Bill look a grump in a new color once and then be over it. That's the closest comparison I can think of

You could end up with a Mack Brown effect where the talent level goes up considerably in the short term bc of his name recognition and NFL connection, before it flames out spectacularly bc the man can't coach them. But in the age of NIL, I'm not even sure how much of a boost he would get us

Yeah had a post on it but looks like it got deleted. Both men and women had at least one 5 🌟 each on campus plus multiple 4 🌟.

Oof I think you're going to be underwhelmed. I think the best case is a saavy G5/FCS HC who brings in one elite/proven coordinator to run the side of the ball that they don't specialize in.

Oh you have higher standards than me. I think our next coach will be someone that comes out of nowhere, like a position coach in the NFL, only to surround himself with coordinators that you can't find on Wiki.

I mean shit, at this point I'd take him just cause it would give a reason for a lot of people to tune into watch VT every week.

Would it help us win? Probably not, but he is a name that drives viewership, and that actually could end up making us a shitload of extra money in ACC revenue sharing going forward.

Because they're ~25 year olds who are chronically online but weren't around to watch him suck with the Bucs and then the Raiders

mixing metaphors - a clear sign that the fanbase is completely discombobulated by the sad state of affairs

Pages