Recent Comments
To get this discussion back on track...if anything I think he may be giving our secondary too much respect. We're good, no doubt, but we've struggled with big physical receivers a lot in the past few years and they have two monsters on the outside. Add in a dynamic force like Switzer who is going to be occupying safety help, our defense could be in a lot of 1on1 battles that tilt in their favor. Also intresting how he noted that they played against two very different pass defenses in Pitt and Florida State. Each team tried to slow them down in different ways and neither was very effective. I'd like to think we have a slightly more complete defense than either (Florida State has the talent obviously but looks out of sorts, Pitt's cornerback play has been atrocious) but we won't know until we play this game. This will be one I wish TV offered better camera angles because I'm keen to watch how Chuck Clark aligns and reacts to a passing scheme that is going to try and keep him from helping anyone over the top.
3 in 210
We're thinking of all of you down there right now. Keep us up to date on your status, Fireman. We are concerned.
Pretty sure just about every post Joe was referencing was from a longtime TKP poster
So the surfers will be out tomorrow. Done that before.
What I don't get is the constant need of some to continually try and throw cold water on any positive energy surrounding the program right now.
No one's throwing cold water on optimism. It's being thrown on people calling out a neutral third party who gave some reasonable responses and some very insightful answers that are being ignored because he had the gall to not pump sunshine up our asses. The only disrespect being shown is towards the UNC writer. There has yet to be any discussion of the actual game in this thread, only griping over someone who wasn't gladhanding our fanbase.
It's fair enough to respond to "opponent O will win" with "the fuck they are, because X, Y, Z" where X, Y, Z are intelligent football thoughts/arguments. However, the rah-rah, lowbrow comments that appear in many threads have brought down TKP's collective intelligence and high quality of discourse that made reading the comments and interacting enjoyable.
Somewhat related from the content aspect of TKP, there's a lot of time and care put into what's published. As a writer and editor, when the discussion on a front-page post devolves into comments like 'let's show these pole smokers what's up' (as verbatim as I could remember), you're less motivated to write something high quality.
There are many other outlets for puffing out your chest and spewing nothing but unintelligent trash talk. Use them for that purpose and not TKP. Ultimately, it's adding noise to the discussion on TKP, and it's not a big deal every once in a while, but it doesn't need to be done over and again (especially by the same TKPers). And as I said above, there's a way all at the same time to be excited, proud, and objective about Hokies' football.
As the community grows, it gets harder and harder to maintain a high level of discussion. I've said it before, but it's up to the longtime TKPers to set an example. Otherwise the community will degrade to one you don't want to visit.
I guess I am the odd hokie. I don't see any problem with the Hokie account posting a list of how good the pass defense has been. We have been DBU since Torrain played under Bud Foster. The Florida defense is also VERY good. Second this year under Florida isn't bad especially when you consider has Florida played anybody that actually throws the ball? UT doesn't.
We don't need anything fancy! Just some good folks to hang with. We literally got a car and clothes lol that's about it. I'll def give you a shout once we get parked we had just planed on parking and walking around some anyways. It is much appriciated. Again if you need me to bring anything let me know and I'll grab it on the way in!
Personally, I preferred the Zabian Dowdell red hotness

I don't know if that device does what you think it does
Maybe Suck Bang and Blow will wash away. Save Flows and Dead Dog though!
Jake from State Farm
Edit: didn't see Koastal's comment earlier
Evans' dual-threat ability gives him an added dimension over Trubisky;
This is kind of starting to bug me. Has anyone checked out the fact that Trubinsky trots the 40 at a sub 4.6 clip, and he was actually touted as a highly ranked dual threat himself coming out of high school?
He doesn't showcase it, because he can spin the ball all over the field, and he's pretty surgical. I would imagine though, that if the passing game isn't there, Trubinsky is a threat to run. Dude's got some wheels.
Great interview, thx! One Q: Was this misdirection or do you really think "the strength of the Hokies' defense lies in the secondary"?
Gotta be DL, right?
In Durham now since we had to evacuate out for Matthew. Section 107 right here, trying to be in Chapel Hill around 12ish.
DRINK!
http://www.thekeyplay.com/content/2016/october/7/ot-chapel-hill-check
There will be 3 of us in section 111 row A.
Four of us in Sec 103.
I'm not a computer, but I think in the Hokies' case, the BYE week is a disadvantage.
It's a question of rest vs. rust. If the team is reeling from some bad games, and some guys are nicked up, then the BYE week serves as a needed re-up, and timeout. However after ECU, the Hokies were like a hot Malcolm Delaney raining down threes. What do you do with a shooter on a hot streak? Feed him that rock.
Don't know if it's a killer disadvantage, but I wouldn't be surprised to see the Hokies start slow out of the gate Saturday.
Honestly, I think VT, UNC, and Miami are in a whole different class from the rest of the Coastal, and its going to be a fun 3 team slugfest to get to Orlando.
Pitt might have something to say about that. They gave UNC a hell of a game.
This may be the single most important factor in "advanced" stats for college football. Along with strength-of-schedule, but the two go hand-in-hand.
Did you see the game last week in which, in the first few minutes, three players carried the ball into the end zone, resulting in a score of 9-6?
The money started on the Hokies and hasn't stopped. The betting experts don't usually jump in until a couple hours before the game, so we won't know what they're doing until gametime. If they side with the public (which isn't very often) then I'd say we have a great sign.
Or would favor the team that runs the ball better instead of the team that relies more on passing?

Let's get this train back on track. Here's a very cool analysis from Bob Stoll at SB Nation:
http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2016/10/7/13205022/virginia-tech-north-...
A couple of highlights from the analysis:
Them's fightin' words, Dr. Bob.
And beyond some of the cool stats, here's what it all comes down to:
Well worth a read, and not just because the conclusion is pro-Hokie. Lots of nice stats to complement the Q&A here and Joel's weekly breakdown.