Recent Comments

If we can get an offensive-minded head Head Coach and can keep Bud Foster at Defense Coordinator, that could be very dangerous.

I don't know how anyone thinks this is a valid scenario. If I were someone's apprentice for 20+ years, then that person left, and I was not given the job, no way in hell I'd stick around and do the same job for a different person.

EDIT: Foster almost took a lateral career move to TA&M this season. I don't think he's sticking around if he didn't love the staff here.

Easy. The ACCCG winner.

The CCGs are now the de facto first round of the playoffs. Which is a big part of the reason the Big XII-2 is starting to come apart at the seams.

I would love to see something like the following scenario (you can use any conference, I will just go with the ACC)

Lets say you have the following set up
Atlantic: Clemson 12-0 - ranked Top 5
FSU - 11-1 - only loss to Clemson (possible top 10 but at worst top 15 ranking)
Coastal: Virginia Tech - 10-2 - Top 25 team (loss to undefeated OSU and another non-GT team)

10-2 VT defeats 12-0 Clemson in ACCCG.

Which of the 3 teams, if any, gets a playoff spot?

Overall point is that a 2 loss bama could very well win the sec and slide in to the plyoffs. So it doesn't seem like such a controversial statement to me once you let the air out of it.

You are making the dangerous assumption that all the people involved or who have useful information were already questioned.

Uh, that principle in the second paragraph of my post applies in both situations... note how both are mentioned. But let me spell it out for you more specifically.

In a criminal proceeding if you destroy evidence and get caught, you get charged with additional crimes (obstruction of justice and/or destruction of evidence) and if the prosecution is allowed to tell the jury about it you're more likely to be found guilty on your original charge.

In sports rules-breaking investigation with punishment meted out by a Commissioner, if you destroy potential evidence, you are quite likely to get punished as if the missing evidence proved your guilt, or receive an even stiffer penalty.

See Georgia Tech for another example... very minor NCAA athlete benefit infraction, but GT tampered with witnesses and stonewalled the NCAA investigation, so they were hit with some pretty hefty penalties. Had they cooperated the NCAA would've basically cleared them of the original charges and issued no punishment.

^^^^^ This

At this point, this whole ordeal is really not about the deflated footballs anymore. Its clear by the wording of Goodell's decision yesterday that the issue now is Brady's complete lack of cooperation with the NFL.

Part of that is not handing over the cell phone. Certainly Brady was within his rights to not do so. But if there is a possibility that this might go to a trial a trial situation or at the very least continue through an appeal process in which the phone recrod might be useful, having an assistant destroy it is not a good look.

If the NFL is moving towards citing "lack of cooperation" as their reasoning for the suspension, I really don't know how, in federal court, a judge would be convinced otherwise.

Pages