Recent Comments

Perhaps (although I'd argue that nothing at all in any of this is "dangerous"...). Nevertheless, by the same token, aren't you assuming they weren't?

So when are the rules of criminal proceedings relevant and when are they not? It seems like you use them for comparative purposes when it's convenient, but not when they're not.

I can't find a link to it at the moment, but a few weeks ago the lady and I were in Blacksburg and the bookstore on campus is selling a few shirts with the Lunch Pail and W.I.N. prominently displayed. I think its a reasonable bet they're moving towards using it more.

I believe the actual wording says conference championship is to be considered, not necessarily the CCG. I think the Texas conference screwed itself by naming co-champions. If the conference can't decide which one should go, how can the committee? Not saying winning a CCG does not help, as it is another marquee win, but is not what is supposed to be the other factor outside of who you played. Also, the committee has likely heard from a lot people pissed the Texas conference did not get in, and would/should give them preference in a toss up this year. A clear 1 loss champion would probably get in over most 1 loss teams that did not win the CCG from another conference if that loss did not come to playoff bound team.

If we can get an offensive-minded head Head Coach and can keep Bud Foster at Defense Coordinator, that could be very dangerous.

I don't know how anyone thinks this is a valid scenario. If I were someone's apprentice for 20+ years, then that person left, and I was not given the job, no way in hell I'd stick around and do the same job for a different person.

EDIT: Foster almost took a lateral career move to TA&M this season. I don't think he's sticking around if he didn't love the staff here.

Easy. The ACCCG winner.

The CCGs are now the de facto first round of the playoffs. Which is a big part of the reason the Big XII-2 is starting to come apart at the seams.

Pages