Recent Comments
I doesn't count for 2 reasons.
1. It was you.
2. It's obvious no one is eating it. No bites or forkfulls missing. It's designed to be grotesque just to try and win a point.
Although it's been stated, I just want to reiterate how awesome of a post this is. Bravo
I'll pose another argument - one that may blow your mind (at least for those from the East coast).
Allow me to introduce the ice-creamed cookie: The Pizookie
... Unless they have a pass rush that totally F's up the quarterback. Comon, French - you of all people...
I just want the Clemson Tigers humbled one way or another, before Tajh leaves.
Or the guy that was just deposed at USCw
Your stuff is great, but I believe that this is my favorite so far. Thanks!
ah yes, I was thinking just along those lines. Similar thinking would be expected from a fellow ae grad though. Not a fan of the weighting in the denominator though as it can produce unexpected results sometimes. Maybe have the weighting in the numerator? Or even based on a percentage, like this (which would mostly just penalize for uncaught balls that were catchable)
{A[er/(er+ed)] +B[sr/(sr+sd)] + C[tr/(tr+td)]} / (A+B+C) where A,B,C are your weighting coefficients
I'd also be interested to know what percentage of LTs throws have been in each catagory. IE, you have %Catchable Balls (CB), but it would be neat to see %Easily Catchable, %Should be Catchable and %Touch Catchable. Since it includes the influence of defenders it would be dependent on defenses, but over the course of the year might show some interesting trends.
Finally, I would not call it a "percent" (as it is not), but a rating. So Fuller was 4 pts (not 4%) better in 2012 than Knowles has been earlier in the year in 2013
My thoughts on Dabo -
Rutabaga is the worst. And you can put it in a pie too.
Me to, its almost guaranteed positive yardage every carry lol
I'm all for downvoting anything to do with LOLUVA. Don't worry, the TKP community understands and will more than make up for the downvotes.
I will definitely take a Marshawn Lynch 2.0 in our backfield.
but lets be real guys Marshawn Williams is Marshawn Lynch 2.0.
Pure coincidence?
CHERRY PIE
Not from Logan its not.
RW was so much more shiftier than MW and a completely different runner.There are some things in the highlights that RW has done himself, but lets be real guys Marshawn Williams is Marshawn Lynch 2.0. Runs like him, has power like him, and he makes you pay to tackle him. Lynch is also his idol and he watches Lynch highlights before every game for those of you who didn't know. Very humble kid and he works hard. Plays with a chip on his shoulder.
Hope not, I love seeing their spirits getting physically crushed.
Remember when they were crying on the sidelines with towels over their heads whilst getting smashed 38-0....AT HOME. That thought keeps me warm at night...
If this were a wizarding world and I needed a happy thought to conjure my patronus, that would be it.
Butter creme frosting
Pineapple upside down cake
Weight gain exercise. :(
Come to Virginia Tech. If you are young and good, you will play.
Excellent question. I counted that particular pass as "out of reach," because when the ball crossed paths with Coles, he was unable to make a play on it, even though it was due to a lack of effort on his part.
So, to answer, a lack of effort on a receiver's part does not play a part in catch efficiency. Several times in 2012 when Logan was throwing to Dyrell Roberts, Roberts made little to no effort to catch a pass that he probably could have at least gotten a hand on however, he didn't, so all of those passes were filed as "out of reach."
May the pie/cake debate rage on...
You might want to double check; but I think Bud Foster's base salary is higher than CFB's. (Not counting incentives and perks)