Recent Comments
As a Busey fan, I take slight offense at your notion that he could not have an intellectual conversation with former Sec. of State Condi Rice
Behold the atomic superfullers!
Note: Chronotons not included.
I hope we filibusttheirasses.
Let's troll the hell out of UNC and use their exact away uniforms with a big VT across the chest.
If they're all derived from the same cell/cell line, then I suspect we could make a strong argument that an entire team of Fullers only necessitates the use of one scholarship.
I had to laugh out loud at this
Agreed, and in this case I believe the LunchPailocrats are going to be the ones shutting down the TarHeelicans.
Actually that whole first sentence really doesn't make sense now that I think of it. I was referring to something that is going to occur in the future as having already happened.
Sweet.
So 'Roanoke' it is!
ACC being pretty strong in both sports would be my guess.
BEST TOUCH EVER
If the play off would have been 8 teams I doubt there would have been much controversy, besides arguing for the sake of arguing. Very, very rarely are we talking about #8 and #9 much at the end of the season. After championship games 4 or 5 teams have really separated themselves from the pack being undefeated, with 1 loss, or proved how good they are.
Years like '07, '09, and '10 are perfect examples. Not much separation in the top 5, but nothing too interesting happening towards the bottom of the Top 10.
I'm just a haole
Unselfish. Saint Exum.
What's up with all these ACC QBs that also want to play baseball?
Wilson, Parker, now Winston, and this is the first I've heard about Renner.
Nothing wrong with it (I love baseball), but it seems very common in our conference.
This...just....this...
You, sir, are now in charge.
I expect the first batch of new Fullers in time for the bowl game.
Yeah hell yeah.
I've heard Bobby Bowden floated among the names being suggested for the committee. They've talked about a rep for each conference plus a few other non-affiliated folks.
Having said that, Tranghese probably has the background needed to be an intelligent member of the committee. Beamer, when he retires. Bill Snyder. Lloyd Carr. Former coaches are good if they have integrity. Not Tressel.
Im a student athletic trainer and I was working with the D line this week and after every practice this week he's brought up the rushing yards against UNC and he keeps telling them that they should be pissed. Oh and he says his dislike for UNC is the same as UVA and how he says they think they are better then VT. He also keeps telling them that this is UNCs playoff game and they will come out wanting to win. Bud has them fired up.
I might get some downvotes for being grammar police here..but here is one thing that kind of bothers me and I see it a lot on here
when people say something like "if blank blank blank would/could of blank blank blank"
that is completely wrong..and it makes NO sense.
I know that it sounds like "would of" or "could of" when you're talking but to be correct it is actually "would have" or "could have"
"I should of seen that coming" doesn't make any sense when you break it down.
"I could have seen that coming" is correct.
and I'll dismount from the soap box now.
we're discussing it here:
http://www.thekeyplay.com/content/2013/october/3/facyson-will-start#comm...
I thought the same thing. I never thought the BCS was perfect, and I hated the idea of only have one game for the championship instead of a playoff. But a committee is really only necessary when you have a big field, I don't think the computers ever screwed up in picking the top 4 teams. Maybe the top 2, but in some order the top 4 was usually right.