Recent Comments

We'll see how much of a tailspin Free Shoes puts Murland into this weekend...
They could be ranked in mid November, but we'll see. Would make beating them that much sweeter!!!!

I'm sure there are a handful of teams that have that problem in the spring/early season. But we're over third of the way through the season. Our secondary has developed a very good chemistry. IMO you put the players who give you best chance to win on the field. Regardless of age/seniority. If that's Antone, then he plays. If that's Facyson, then he plays.

UCLA -4.5
Murland +14.5 (but barely...I don't see them being in this game at all...)
Miami -4.5 the Wreck will live up to their name
Auburn +2.5 The bulldog is not what they thought they were this year. Someone has to disappoint in the $EC.
Ohio State -5.5 Easy street....
Washington +6.5 U Dub!!!

I love this team more and more and the Grimes effect:

Saturday I kind of got bored, Miller said. I didnt really know what to do with myself, so I ended up doing some drills by myself. But it was definitely needed for our bodies to recover. f

Also I have to say that I was critical of Wang last year, but he's proving that I was misguided since it seems he was lacking coaching and was in the wrong position. Reading things like this make me feel even better about him. Kid is a warrior along with the rest of this team:

Beamer said a lot of guys are banged up. Center David Wang snapped the ball with his opposite hand all of last week in practice because of a shoulder injury

Saw him kick 55 and 47 yarders against Radford the night before the Marshall game. I know it was off a tee. But very impressive and the kid has got a leg. He had A LOT of room on that 47...probably was kicked better than the 55.

Having 2 great kickers is a good problem. Like having 4 all conference CBs.

Bruins
Twerps
Da U
Rebels
Buckeyes
Cardinal

If Byrn is hurt, more time for Meyer. They aren't going to be asking Facyson to do what Byrn has been doing. Different skill sets.

Says the guy with that avatar...

I will not get into a debate with you over this. While everyone is saying "do not go there to read anything she writes," well, the same goes for these threads. The thread title typically tells you if it is about her, so skip it. (Just like you wouldn't click on a link that says it's NSFW if you are at work, or maybe even at home.) You know what happens when anyone posts about it (either way)? It moves to the top. Its easy to ignore and bypass....just like when you go to the ESPN site, you have the ability to skip the MLB or NBA coverage, or even her posts, if you desire.

As far as being sexist against her because she is a woman. Well, I said it before, and I'll state it one more time. Incompetence is incompetence, no matter her gender. This is her job, and just because HD is a woman doesn't give her a free pass to do a crappy job. You understand that she is writing about FOOTBALL!!!!! As far as the nicknames go, whatever. If I said that Yertle the Turtle was having a great year, you now who I'm talking about. Mush mouth is trbl and hard to watch at halftimes, you know who I mean. Nick names do not stop at only females.

Most of her posts are filled with bias, poorly written, flip flop from week to week, and this is what the "World wide leader in sports" is giving us as fans as professional journalism. That's not good. Sorry if some seem to take it upon themselves to point out the downfalls or mistakes that are presented by her on a professional page where she is paid to do so. I know in my professional field if I or one of my peers were to perform (poorly) in a similar manner in our job, we would be all over the paper, tv news, blogs, etc. I wouldn't be protected from the firing squad. Neither should she.

I do agree that we don't need to link to her posts. We all know where to find it if we so decide to read them. However, the "stick you head in the sand and don't read it at all" approach is not going to change anything. I highly doubt that ESPN cares either way good or bad if we are discussing her, her posts, her insights, her bias, her absence of posting, her well-written article posted yesterday. To believe so is fooling yourself. However, if you don't like what she is writing, your thoughts need to be posted directly to ESPN or commented on her posts. That will potentially stoke change. Not discussing it here.

Read whatever football reporting you wish. Just make sure to consider the source, take it with a grain of salt, understand what you are reading and who wrote it, and form your own opinions. Cheers to all, and Go Hokies!!!!!

She wrote this on purpose in hopes of jinxing them this weekend. Intentional KOD is not cool, Heather. Not cool at all.

UCLA
Maryland covers
Miami
Auburn covers
Ohio State
Washington

I personally don't like this I understand he's athletic, but if he's playing good why take him out or share reps with Exum when he's not back to himself yet? In today's world nothing is given to anyone why is this any different? If someone does my job better then me when Im out on medical leave there's a chance that I could be replaced, if a player at the next level gets hurt then that's a opportunity for the next guy in line. If that was the case people like Tom Brady wouldn't have been who they're today if it wasn't for the opportunity he had when Bledsoe went down. I understand that this is college football. I know they want to bring Exum back slowly until he gets a feel for the game again, but honestly why take someone who's leading the nation in interceptions as a freshman and have him play a little bit of offense that's a possibility that he could get hurt.

I completely understand that they're doing Exum due diligence by allowing him reps at his spot to eventually take his spot back and I understand that no one wants to lose a spot due to an injury, but that's not how it is in the real world... But I trust Gray's and Foster's judgement that's why they get paid the big bucks.

We should develop a simple little voting system for the site so that isn't necessary anymore.