Recent Comments

RocketHokie13, if you disagree with someone that is one thing, but your sarcasm and rhetoric aren't needed. If you are pc than that's fine, your choice, but your comment seems like a low way to get a point across which is hypocritical if you are trying to correct someone else.

This comment was stupid but can you explain what was so wrong about sevenlayers comment? Nothing inappropriate there to me.

Glad to have her aboard, her work ethic speaks for itself, she doesn't need the young pc generation to defend her, if she has this job it's not because she is weak or a pushover!

I think I read somewhere that this National Duels system was intended to avoid rematches so we wouldn't be getting Penn St. anyway. Even if they weren't trying to avoid rematches, Okie Lite is still the top-ranked team outside of the B1G and would get the 'honor' of being thumped by PSU.

One trend I've noticed with all of the new hires is that they all seem to be genuinely buying into Fuente's vision. That is exciting to me. When every single person is on the same page and has the same vision I think that bodes well for this program moving forward. I love these interviews. Great job Alex!

Yes it is, so is TKP.

That's a strong reach
The threat of a projectile driver is really tough to see.

Meanwhile the state is not required to put seat belts on school buses in order to save the State money.

If the lives of school children are not important or at risk, then the threat of projectile drivers is a non-starter.

So I'm not allowed to comment on a women's attractiveness as a non-sequitur? I can only say it with the caveat that she's well-qualified for her profession and her attractiveness is secondary to her qualifications?

I'm just messing around, I know what you're trying to say but I meant my original statement as a cursory comment, not a reflection of what's important.

Absolutely 100% true. But your original comment only acknowledged the first part. And only the 2nd part is what matters. She was hired for a job she is qualified to do. Looks have nothing to do with it at all.

EDIT: Apparently my comment was "inappropriate". My bad.

I can only be charged if I'm alive. If I become a projectile, smash through someone else's windshield, I die and kill them or cause serious them bodily harm, what then? If I'm wearing a seat belt, the damage and injury is almost certainly mitigated.

Moreover, driving is a privilege, not a right. The state can do whatever it pleases to regulate an optional activity that I choose to engage in provided that it doesn't actually cross into some guarantee of my rights. There's no infringement on my rights or individual liberties in the case of seatbelt laws. So I really don't understand this "overreach" argument. There are rules for the road. Most of them fall under the same classifications re: tickets and fines. They serve the purpose to enforce behavior that is largely deemed to be otherwise potentially harmful to people or property, public or private. Do the penalties generate revenue for the state? Sure, but that doesn't make the laws themselves invalid or some sort of government overreach.

You should only be embarrassed if you continue to allow the guy with mistress comment to stay. Use your authority, friend.