Recent Comments

I'd actually pay to watch this.
Yet somehow the average bowl is viewed by about 6 million people. That's including the bowls on during the week, multiple games on at the same time, games on ESPNU, etc.
Exactly, that's the way its supposed to go
This is called "losing your leverage."
Have confirmed report by @AnwarRichardson that Texas president Greg Fenves is headed to Tulsa tonight to meet with OC target Sterlin Gilbert— Chuck Carlton (@ChuckCarltonDMN) December 11, 2015
Incorrect.
Only 10 teams have managed to maintain bowl streaks that started before the rules changed in 2006.
It's not easy to avoid a bad season. Bowl streaks aren't what they once were (although one could argue there are far more competitive teams now than in, say, the 70s), but a double digit bowl streak will still be an accomplishment.
I'm happy to have him but I still feel like someone should post the picture of the obese woman with the gaped open mouth that screams "wat"?
Definitely shooting from hip. The rules changed in 2006 to allow 6-6 teams to be bowl eligible. Yet only 10 schools have active bowl streaks that started before 2006.
1) I may have incorrectly assumed this.
2) I don't see this happening.
3) I, like many others, enjoy football games no matter who is playing. I doubt anyone can catch all of the bowls, but that's not an argument against more football.
Does it really mean any more -- to anyone -- whether it's two 8-4 teams playing or two 6-6 teams?
So, speaking philosophically, if two 6-6 teams play in a bowl game, and nobody watches, will someone still complain that the bowl shouldn't exist?
Yea I just saw on Facebook AB mentioned in a comment that he had had a "back and forth" with Zohn and that "football is football" and that it's "not a big adjustment."
Burden knows the game of football. there is zero doubt he will get the best out of the RBs under the overall guidance of Fuente.
Double post?
He'll take his focus on WR's blocking and carry it over to the RB's.
I'll be curious to see the staff's analysis of Fuente's offense and the RB role: blocking and receiving out of the backfield, etc.
So, to summarize your above argument, 6-6 teams should not go to bowl games because it is a "devalued" bowl game that you, or a similar situated fan, cannot make the time to watch.
Cool. I also don't have the time watch "Chloe and Lamar." I'm not asking it to go away.
I live near JMU and the radio here is saying that Withers has the ECU job.
Just nit-picking here. But, all three of those arguments are not counter arguments arguing why not. They are simply side arguments arguing an alternative exists.
IMO, if you're going to change the status quo, offer up a compelling reason why. I don't see any compelling reason of why 6-6 teams should not go to a bowl.
The vision of 11 TE on the field at once is coming true!
Nice, I can see the 5 OL and 6 qb offense coming!
Dare I say it, but CJF has been #enfuente since day one!
ESPN basically owns the bowl season and that's a lot of content for them. Would be surprised if they're on board with this.
Yes! yes, yes!
Zohn, if you're reading this: (1) Congrats! (2) Coach your players to get back to the numbers!

This is also an official story from TKP, relaying the official media release provided by VT.
The earlier story was about the reports, before VT officially announced Burden's new position.