Recent Comments

This is also an official story from TKP, relaying the official media release provided by VT.

The earlier story was about the reports, before VT officially announced Burden's new position.

This is called "losing your leverage."

Incorrect.

Only 10 teams have managed to maintain bowl streaks that started before the rules changed in 2006.

It's not easy to avoid a bad season. Bowl streaks aren't what they once were (although one could argue there are far more competitive teams now than in, say, the 70s), but a double digit bowl streak will still be an accomplishment.

1) I may have incorrectly assumed this.
2) I don't see this happening.
3) I, like many others, enjoy football games no matter who is playing. I doubt anyone can catch all of the bowls, but that's not an argument against more football.

He'll take his focus on WR's blocking and carry it over to the RB's.
I'll be curious to see the staff's analysis of Fuente's offense and the RB role: blocking and receiving out of the backfield, etc.

So, to summarize your above argument, 6-6 teams should not go to bowl games because it is a "devalued" bowl game that you, or a similar situated fan, cannot make the time to watch.

Cool. I also don't have the time watch "Chloe and Lamar." I'm not asking it to go away.

Just nit-picking here. But, all three of those arguments are not counter arguments arguing why not. They are simply side arguments arguing an alternative exists.

IMO, if you're going to change the status quo, offer up a compelling reason why. I don't see any compelling reason of why 6-6 teams should not go to a bowl.

Pages