Recent Comments

Same here Dozer. I usually blame it partly on the camera crew though.

I know one thing about Sean, he's still trolling the bees:
Glennoned
**Full Disclosure** I took this from a poster on EDSBS

I question any list of loud stadiums that doesn't take stadium pop into consideration. I have watched games in all of these stadiums and while I agree LSU is insanely loud, VT and Oregon can be just as loud with a lot less people. the reorder of this list should be:

No. 5: Camp Randall Stadium, Wisconsin

No. 4: Kyle Field, Texas A&M

No. 3: Tiger Stadium, LS

No. 1 (Tie): Lane Stadium, Virginia Tech

No. 1 (Tie): Autzen Stadium, Oregon

Oregon has fewer people but the stadium, like the Seahawks, has been designed to amplify sound. Another poster mentioned that Lane also was designed to do this but actually it was designed to retain sound which is different. So I'll put them for a tie for 1rst.

Why would we hold back? Because losing to ECU and Marshall really doesn't matter. At all. We just want the ACC, so anything we do that would help us win conference games is what we're gonna do. That's my theory.

That game against the fighting Manginas was a complete disaster in so many ways.
/spine shutter/
/dry heave/

ugh, the Kansas game... damn... losing to basketball universities is just not acceptable

i remember when they made that play. i leapfrogged off my buddy's couch and yelled loud enough to scare his then toddler son to tears. good times.

then we paid thousands of dollars to watch them lay an egg against kansas. bad times.

Incorrect. Sam Rogers dump would never dirty itself with CPJ's head.

You had to go and bring up that little bit of wonderful "Especially on 4th and 1 from Shotgun"....I about lost an entire bottle of Jack when they lined up that way. Its especially bad when the television broadcast guys, who had been mediocre at best all day are going, "Well, I assume that with a quarterback that's 6'6" and 235 they will line Logan up and run the sneak" Bad day when they seem to have better situational awareness than the entire offensive coaching staff.

Please, more I formation! I really wish we would see Logan under center more often. I also think our best playmakers are in the backfield. I realize our coaches know way more about football and our team than I do, but this awkward "pistol" offense we have been working on since the beginning of last year has never taken off - and as a fan it's driving me crazy. Our drives just stall once we get inside the 30.

This is what I wanted when Loeffler and the rest of the staff were hired:

A 100% turnaround of LT3
A front line that would stop all sacks and open all holes
A fast paced offense that would light up the scoreboard

Realistically that was never going to happen, but it is what I wanted. But Loeffler has improved LT3 (in another post it was mentioned he (LT3) actually looked happy again playing his position). The O-line has done much better then I have been used to seeing. Now I think it is a matter of meshing all the parts together. Loeffler could have the greatest playbook in the sport but will never be able to implement it until all the players are on the same page. My personal feeling is he was/is trying different looks and formations to see which ones work best with the players he has. He can then start building from there going into conference play. Can't expect miracles in the 8 months he has been there and fixing three to four years of bad coaching will take time.

And this why these guys go to college for an education first and football second. In theory anyways

I'm sad to say I am not friends with him on FB LOL! And why does that name sound fake to me?

He works for a mortgage company up in NOVA now. He actually was on the sports junkies yesterday morning discussing his brother getting the starting nod in Tampa, and the hosts kept referring to Sean as the nub Glennon.

Pages