Recent Comments
At least I'm going to pick 6 this week instead of 5, so maybe I will get 2 right... but that is probably just wishful thinking.
I'm going back to picking the teams that I want to lose and use a little reverse psychology.
Kansas State - yeah no one likes Miami, but the ACC can use all the wins we can get
tOSU - That is a lot of points, hopefully the UCF golden/black/yellow? some color of Knight can give the Walnuts a scare
Florida - I'm not sure why, but I think that aTm and VT are similar plus we have beat them a few times so I don't mind rooting for them against typical SEC schools.
The Fighting Lesticles (LSU) - The Huskies don't play any defense but maybe they can score a few points.
Nebraska - They are ranked close to us so they should lose!
UGA - I love rooting against the SEC and yes I know Mizzou is "in" the SEC.
Looked Tyrod-esque
Kstate beats the spread
OsU beats the spread
Florida wins and beats the spread
Lsu wins but doesn't cover the spread
Nebraska wins and covers spread
UGA wins and covers the spread
I thought you were trying to say Trayvon for a second there...
Forget I said it. Let's not bring that debate up in here.
Sunseri with that shovel pass from almost parallel with the ground.
Da-nuh-nuh! Da-nuh-nuh! Would be totally surprised if that isn't your top play from today.
Cincinnati: Utilize a lot of short routes in the passing game, RB Abernathy looks similar to David Wilson as far as running style, and the way they use him out in space.
Pitt: Sunseri has one hell of an arm but is extremely inaccurate, however they hardly ever throw (no need to with Ray Graham and Shell); as previously stated Cincy is dominating Pitt's O-Line (I assumed that Cincy's front 7 was average as you guys affirmed, so ours should do even more damage)
this is the leader in the clubhouse for the rest of the year.
Always works.... Roll up whatever you want to smuggle in the jacket, rubber band it and walk right in. I waltzed right on through the gate with 2 large ziplock bags of pepperoni rolls, cookies, and airplane bottles rolled up in my rain jacket.
It's a beautiful thing.
I usually stuff the rain coat and contraband in my purse in case I get jostled before I get to the bag checker so I can stuff it back together real quick inside my bag without calling attention to myself.
K State
UCF
UF
UDub
Taylor Martinez
Georgia, Georgia....
Especially Pitt, who is playing like shit. Great opportunity for the offense and the special teams to hit their stride. The defense only needs to keep doing what they're doing, and defend the pass.
Hilarity ensues.
KSU - The U has been on the struggle bus for a while now. And I always expect them to embarrass the ACC.
OSU - Ugh. No comment.
Florida - A&M's first game of the year? Yeah, bad luck for them.
LSU - Sure, a live tiger at practice is really going to help UW play better against LSU...
Nebraska - I hate Nebraska, but there is no way UCLA wins against them.
UGA - Mizzou won't know what hit them after this game.
seattle hokie, but he at least did us the courtesy of doing it drunk.
since in maryland, you need to make your way to philly and find alchemist heady topper in cans, very few places have it, but it is so worth it.
I think that Pitt looks very, very bad, Cincinnati could compete for the Big East championship and Munchie Legaux is an awesome name.
I don't deserve the opportunity to analyze my picks. So, here they are.
Kansas State -6.5
OSU -17.5
aTm -1.5
LSU -23.5
Nebraska -5.5
UGA -1.5
This is so damn bossy right here.
...
Rushel shell is the only bright spot us far, and he totally whiffed on two pass blocks. Pitt's o-line is getting dominated by Cincy's average d-line.
I'm trying to decide if cincy is good or Pitt is that bad. so far Pitts d looks horrible. I haven't heard anything abt cincy this year
The last column is how it fared against the spread. So for Boise, it predicted Boise to win and to cover (which they did). It also predicted Rutgers to win and to cover - Rutgers won and did not cover.
Long story short: the scores in bold are the ones where it predicted the winner correctly and the last column is whether or not it was correct against the spread.
Not looking too positive. Where were the safeties on that run?
But it predicted Boise to win but MSU won that game. And the Rutgers prediction is the same way. Am I reading it wrong? Otherwise, those are about the most accurate computer predictions I've ever seen.
Looking to see how Pitt bounces back after Saturday.

a 51 on the Hokie and it's over.